aceman_16

For the record.. I am NOT saying that win mattered. I just wanted to show people that the Pats* had most of their entire team play the first half sans 2 players. I also wanted to point out that the Bills were winning before they were pulled out. I am not twisting that IF the Pats* wanted to win or they kept the starters in that they would have.

lol the starting Offense oddly had 0 (zero) defensive snap counts and vice-versa! Ex: Tom Brady QB 32 snaps 48% of the total offensive plays Tom Brady QB Defensive plays 0 0% Tom Brady QB Special Team plays 0 0%

... we would have won with either quarterback. Fixed it for ya!

Oh yeah...additional information: our starters versus theirs (before they subbed out some players) were leading 17 to 6 at half time. But change facts to fit your narrative if you must.

Actually... you are revising history. I posted an actual game stats link earlier. In case you missed it here is the link https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201412280nwe.htm#all_vis_snap_counts As you can see... pretty much their entire defense started. However, for those too lazy to check their facts here is a fun copy paste from there: Patriots Starters Player Pos Tom Brady QB (48% of the snaps) Brandon Bolden RB ** Danny Amendola WR ** oops howd he get on there... you swore he didnt play! and 81% of snaps to boot! Brandon LaFell WR Brian Tyms WR Michael Hoomanawanui TE Nate Solder LT Josh Kline LG Bryan Stork C Ryan Wendell RG Marcus Cannon RT Chandler Jones RE Rob Ninkovich LDE Alan Branch DT Vince Wilfork DT Sealver Siliga DT Jamie Collins LB Jonathan Casillas LB Darrelle Revis LCB Logan Ryan RCB Devin McCourty S Patrick Chung S Anyhow, carry on!

Did Brady start? .... cause he is the only one who matters. And just checked Nate Soldier played. Who are the 2 tackles you are referring to. Amendola played. Blount played. Vareen played. Most of their entire defense played. So yeah most of their starters started. And here ya go... https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/201412280nwe.htm#all_vis_snap_counts

Lol... they started their starters and we went in with a JV team. The "matter" part would be correct

Wait...is "going in" code for meh nevermind. Enjoy the brisket.

I like Richie.... mostly because I love borderline dirty and gritty offensive and defensive linemen on my team.

God says "Yep I know when.... December 28th, 2014.... you're welcome. Now go to church ya heathen!"

I would still love to have Mayfield.

Hmmm.... east of Buffalo sounds like a good opportunity for the mucks of Elba!

That makes it sound like offendork

LOL... I stand corrected!

Here is a nice link to the over 100 page stadium study.... happy reading. http://wivb.com/bills-stadium-full-report/

Batavia?

Downtown is not east of Buffalo.

I voted other for Dunkirk Don.

But but.... we let Darby, Williams, and Gilmore get away!!

I have watched it a few times. I can say it would be hard to say it was intentional. I think that it is because it was Suh that did it .... thus we asSUHm the worse (bad but cracked me up!).

I am guessing that MANY words start off as slang and then they become part of standard English. For example, "I will 'text' you later." Text started off as a much different word than "I will send you some digital information via my phone." I could go on and on but I won't. Finally, making a point by calling out someone's fine understanding of the english language (whether it be spelling, grammar, or use of non-standard english words) just ironically weakens one's eventual counter point.

I am unable to grasp the purpose of this thread. Are you saying that a coach who has pushed/praised group accomplishments (aka "be 1 of 11) should discuss a personal accomplishment or two during an after-game interview? It appears that too many people need to lay off the nit picking. What's next? Go back to the clapping complaints?

Tre and Kyle.... just because

They can keep the WRs.... give me the 1st overall draft pick at QB instead!!

Anyone want to go in with me? I have a TON of beer bottles to return!