HomeskillitMoorman

Not simply for spreading an STD, but knowingly spreading one is really messed up. If this lawyer is being real about this supposed phone call where he said that, that I obviously don't know. That's why I prefaced it with IF.

He's not representing himself well in this specific instance though

Wait he had sex with her knowing he had an STD? Or he found out about it after? If it's the former I'd probably cut him on that alone.

If she lied about being in college that could be different, if she said she was in high school I don't think it's that simple.

I think it's different when they're adults. This girl was a kid. It's different if she lied about being in college, but if she told him she was in high school that's sketchy to me.

It's still gross that as a 21 year old that he had sex with a high schooler. And it's bad judgement on his part, if I loved the game I would not risk it on a banging a high schooler even aside from it being sketchy in it of itself.

Yeah I'm pretty skeptical here of Araiza even on just the possible sex with a minor...but this lawyer seems like a total clown

Cut him. He still had sex with a minor either way. He's human trash.

Do what ya gotta do, I would never look down on someone for working. I don't think the OP was doing that. But as some people mentioned here, I've also taken Ubers from people who are retired and don't need the money, they actually just enjoy it.

He's probably having a tough time cross-referencing this on OAN, Tucker Carlson, or Stormfront.org.

Pro-life people don't actually do that. It's about power and control, not actually helping the life they want to force a woman to give birth to.

I think their reasoning is lazy and I don't like a lot of that list...but I think McD being somewhere in the middle of the pack is pretty accurate. I also agree with what a couple of others have said in this thread...they mentioned his strong defensive acumen but his defenses have consistently come up small in the biggest games and moments of his time here.

I mean even if some of you don't know anything about the JFK assassination, haven't you at least watched Seinfeld?

I'm in my 30's but it made me feel old when neither Josh or Mahomes knew what that was

I agree about having people with different world views on those shows. That's part of what's wrong with the news in general is CNN or Fox primarily just put on guests that agree with them so they're essentially just talking to themselves and affirming each other. Although I will say now that I've seen clips of Will Cain on Fox News, his ESPN stuff was only a glimpse into the nut job he really is. I love the NBA playoffs (I would probably love it in general if I wasn't a Knicks fan) so our views there are probably different, a weaker broadcasting team isn't going to deter me from watching the playoffs. But I do like TNT, especially catching clips of some of the great stuff from their postgame show with Shaq/Barkley/Kenny/Ernie, that team is amazing and hilarious.

I mean I would never listen to Clay Travis, but I think ESPN has taken somewhat of a hit. I also would agree with others here that ESPN still does live sports really well, even though they've missed on some of their assemblies of broadcasting crews for sure and they've had a lot of changes with their shows and other content. But you also have to look at the landscape, there's just so many options now and so many ways to stream or "illegally" watch sports, even if they were killing it with all of their changes I'm not sure if their numbers would drastically be up.

This is always such a tricky thing. There are definitely women out there who want to take advantage of athletes and celebrities and get either attention or win a big lawsuit or grab a settlement, whatever it may be...and then obviously there are male athletes/celebrities who do horrible things to women and have historically gotten away with it. It can also be really difficult for a woman to prove she was the victim in a word vs word case, the women who are gold diggers clearly do them no favors. It's a tough world with no justice sometimes for either side. But yeah if I was a pro athlete, I would really be careful out there. Easier said than done though I'm sure.

In Buffalo but I'm willing to drive wherever there's some good vball! It's always pop Ohhh that looks solid, thanks for the tip!

I can bring the oil

I'm back in the area for a while after not having lived here for a long time, since I was 10 years old...just wondering if any of you play some sand ball out here, would love to join, thanks!

One side will always be happy as long as there is no gun control and they get to control women's bodies. Sadly, a room full of Mexican kids getting shot is not going to move the needle for that ilk of people.

You could say that for a lot of GM's honestly though. Hitting on a QB is far and away the most important factor for a GM.

I mean, Allen alone gives Beane a lot of leeway for other moves that haven't necessarily worked out. Not that I think he shouldn't be judged on anything else. But I still think overall even "aside from Josh", which is kind of hard to do, he's done a pretty solid job. I would agree that we haven't gotten great bang for the buck on some of the resources we've spent on D, especially high-end draft capital and I was a little perplexed we didn't do more for the o-line going into last season. All in all though I think if we're being real...this is a roster that probably should have won the title last year if not for McD's gag job in KC and we're looking pretty good to compete big this year and in the future. He's a keeper for me. EDIT: I also think he has the right temperament and approach to how to have a relationship with the franchise player which is pretty important. As both have mentioned before, they both run their opinions by each other and Beane does ask Josh for his thoughts on certain potential moves...but they have an understanding that it's ultimately Beane's call. This is obviously important given how we've seen some of the relationships between front offices and QB's have had an impact or led to trades or firings, etc.

I mean most people on here won't even do it, I wouldn't expect one of his players to

No, not necessarily a skeptic, but the "no matter what" part I think is what's even more bold than anything I've said. Like if he made a series of horrible moves that led to another playoff loss, you wouldn't even question if he's the right person to move forward with? My point was more that "no matter what" is basically saying there's no accountability or expectation for McD when we have an elite QB that leaves everything out there and has the ability to win a SB, multiple even. If that's the case, then yes, I think Josh's greatness is being really under appreciated or not being acknowledged. The second part you raise some solid questions. Obviously neither I or anyone here would have those answers and certainly some of those things would have to play in. Like I wouldn't want to lose Beane, for instance. There would have to be belief that a coach they possibly have in mind could be a leader for this group. I get that it's not straightforward. But I also don't think that means we should ultimately hang on to what we have "no matter what", in fear of that, if he continues to gag in these big games.