ChiGoose

Trump got raided solely because of Trump’s actions. If he had done what Hillary, Biden, and Pence did, this would all be behind him. I do not understand why that is so hard to grasp.

“who cares about obstruction of Justice” is certainly a take. And for the 1,000,000,000,000th time; what the GOP will do in response to this is IRRELEVANT. My god, how hard is it to understand that?

It also would matter on what the charges are and the evidence is. If prosecutors are able to prove that Joe Biden was actually personally involved with Hunter’s influence peddling and committed crimes as part of that, you would have some liberals upset and definitely some whataboutism but by and large they would be more upset at Biden than law enforcement. I wonder if Senator Franken wants to weigh in on whether or not Dems are generally ok with holding their own accountable.

No, I honestly wouldn’t care if any of them got indicted if they actually committed crimes. At this point, I’m almost hoping Hunter gets indicted.

Yeah, this is why they investigated it. I don’t understand what’s so confusing about this. Biden’s team finds documents, immediately notifies law enforcement. Biden’s team kicks off investigation and finds more documents. Biden’s team then has law enforcement take over lead on investigation. As far as we know, Biden’s team never disobeyed law enforcement, did not conceal anything, did not sue them, and their cooperation was apparently satisfactory because law enforcement did not file any motions against Biden’s team nor publicly comment or leak that Biden’s team was doing anything other than cooperating fully. If they find out that Biden has been personally using documents he knew to be classified, then that changes things. But there is so far no evidence in the public of that.

I don’t understand people’s insistence on confusing notifying the public with notifying law enforcement. Criticize Biden for not notifying the public right away. That’s totally fine and justified! But stop pretending that he hid this from law enforcement when they notified them within a day.

Not ignoring it. Just trying to explain how the law and evidence and defense works. Obviously a Sisyphean task though. Can you explain to me how, given what is publicly known, a prosecutor would argue that Biden personally knew he had those documents, what the expected defense response would be, and how that would turn out? Because until there is evidence that Biden himself personally handled documents that were clearly marked classified, any half decent defense attorney would get him acquitted.

“Anyone I don’t like is a commie funded by (((Soros)))” - A lot of MAGA people in their feels right now

It feels like his hold on the base is weakening a bit, honestly. I wonder if people are just tired of the constant drama.

Buddy, we haven’t even seen the charges yet. All we know is that Trump has been indicted in connection to a crime that somebody else has already gone to jail over. Seems logical that the guy directing the crime would be in legal jeopardy. As for the appropriateness of the specific charges, that’ll have to wait until we actually see them. Given that there are apparently more than 30 counts, this may be a bit bigger than just the Stormy stuff (this office was also handling the Trump Company tax cheating case).

Charging people who commit crimes is weaponizing the judicial system? That’s certainly an interesting perspective. I would think treating politicians differently under the law than the average American would be improper, but I guess I’m wrong.

Your insistence on getting the facts and the law wrong is impressive. No matter how many times it’s explained to you, you continue to ignore reality and repeat the same wrong and/or irrelevant points. Biden, Pence, and Hillary cooperated with law enforcement. Trump obstructed law enforcement. That’s it. That’s the difference. That’s why Trump will be charged and Biden won’t. Just like Hillary wasn’t. Just like Pence won’t be either. And I don’t know how many times you have to be told that the GOP reaction is irrelevant, but I’ll say it again: what the GOP does in retaliation for the law being enforced is irrelevant.

Just ignore him. He’s really in his feels tonight. Poor guy.

I’ll take “Things That Are Never Going to Happen” for $2,000, Ken

I honestly wonder if the people there still mainly view guns as tools instead of fetishizing them.

You’re conflating notifying the authorities with notifying the public. Biden’s team immediately alerted law enforcement and began cooperating with them from the start. Originally that took the form of an internal investigation but when they found additional documents, they changed it and had law enforcement take over the searches. At no point that we are aware of did the Biden team refuse to do what they were asked by law enforcement. Unlike the Trump investigation, there were no court filings between law enforcement and Biden’s team because they were cooperating. There was no need for a raid because Biden was working with law enforcement, not against them like Trump. Despite your incorrect claim, there is no evidence to support an obstruction charge. And from what is known publicly, they case would never make it to trial. It’d be dismissed before it ever got to that point. It is very fair to criticize Biden for concealing this from the public as long as he did, but you’re just factually wrong when you say that he concealed it from law enforcement. You’re entire argument is based on that mistake and falls apart once the real facts are applied.

Mere possession of the documents is almost never prosecuted. All the defense would have to do is establish a shred of doubt that the defendant specifically knew the documents were there. Cases that are successfully prosecuted involve the defendant knowing they had the documents and refusing to comply with the law. Hillary was not charged because, even though the FBI found her to be reckless, they did not believe they could prove she intentionally put the classified documents on her server. Likewise, both Biden and Pence could successfully argue that neither of them personally packed away the documents and there isn’t sufficient evidence to show that they knew that the documents were in their homes and/or were classified. I know you’ll scoff at this, but this is a pretty easy case for a defense attorney to make. What makes Trump’s case different is what he did once the documents were discovered. Instead of cooperating with authorities, he obstructed and lied. He even went so far as to send them a letter they he had returned them all when he had not. In addition to that, it’s been reported that some of the documents were stored in his office desk drawer intermixed with documents dated post-presidency. All of this is damning evidence that shows Trump knew he had the documents and accessed them post-presidency. It would be difficult for a defense to overcome. Additionally, it also supports at least one additional charge of obstruction of justice in addition to the documents charge. And I cannot stress this enough: what the GOP does to Biden is irrelevant to all of the above.

You have both the facts and the law wrong. And also whether the GOP will impeach Biden is irrelevant to Trump’s potential guilt. People whose conduct was bad but would likely win in court: Hillary, Biden, Pence. People whose conduct was so bad that they would likely lose in court: Trump

Irrelevant. 1. Biden’s case is more like Pence’s and Hillary’s than Trump’s. Trump’s actions post-discovery of the documents are classic obstruction of justice and even the most junior prosecutor could prove it with their eyes closed. 2. The GOP is going to do what the GOP is going to do. They don’t need a pretense for impeaching Biden because he wore the wrong color tie or whatever else they want. 3. Whether or not someone is guilty of a crime shouldn’t be decided by whether or not some other person is guilty of a crime.

An anecdote that, while great, doesn’t represent the typical outcome. The epidemiology of self-defense gun use: evidence from the National Crime Victimization Surveys 2007-2011 “Results: Of over 14,000 incidents in which the victim was present, 127 (0.9%) involved a SDGU [self-defense gun use]. SDGU was more common among males, in rural areas, away from home, against male offenders and against offenders with a gun. After any protective action, 4.2% of victims were injured; after SDGU, 4.1% of victims were injured. In property crimes, 55.9% of victims who took protective action lost property, 38.5 of SDGU victims lost property, and 34.9% of victims who used a weapon other than a gun lost property. Conclusions: Compared to other protective actions, the National Crime Victimization Surveys provide little evidence that SDGU is uniquely beneficial in reducing the likelihood of injury or property loss.”

Mike Pence is running for the nomination of the Hang Mike Pence Party. Not sure what he thinks he’s doing but whatever it is, it isn’t getting to the White House.

You’re missing quite a few of the important facts, here. But they do have him dead to rights on both 1 & 2. It’s not even debatable at this point.

Awww, still thinking about me when you go to sleep? So cute! Sorry you’re having such a day, man.

No problem. Sorry you’re having such a rough day, bud. Cheer up! It’s almost the weekend!

(((Globalists))) huh?