transplantbillsfan

I saw both "America's Spirit" and "America's Dream." I like both.

You're a bit blind to reality in this post below: If you don't think there's been a mass narrative against Allen ever since draft season leading up to the 2018 draft, you live in a hole. And the bold is just an outright slap in the face to Allen. I think at this point it's hard to say that Allen hasn't already pretty much proven his doubters wrong. You're going to be the guy who comes out and slams him if he has a really bad game in the middle of 4 other good games. If you think that's the definition of inconsistency for QB play, you're being ridiculous. Also here, if you're really blind to where you're criticism of Allen was.

I can't believe you're still desperately trying to squeeze criticism in here. So it's on Allen to make McKenzie's equilibrium better so he doesn't stumble on that play? Seriously?

It's been a great case study in analytics vs scouting, too

Not the moment... Took me at least 24 hours.

Yes

Thanks... I was super confused about what the heck he was saying.

My bad! Didn't even notice I left out the decimal point til just now.

Have you changed your mind on him yet? Today I'm pretty thankful Josh Allen is improving and has learned from his mistakes.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!!! LET'S GO BUFFALO!!!! Soooooo did Foster just have a cramp against the Broncos? Shocked he can play one short week.

#Metoo Wait... something seems little fishy about that

Fine, don't be interested in per capita. The US, not India, is the 2nd worst contributor to emissions worldwide. Start solving the problem where you're able to. The US can and should be doing something. You guys need to stop deflecting. You're like a pack of guilty kids on the playground who all got into a fight and are pointing at the other guy who started it when you're all part of the problem.

No, China is, then the US, then India... and the US has like 20% the population of each one of those countries. And you're right... as those economies grow, they'll go to the cheapest energy sources, which is quickly turning out to be green energy. The United States already has the electrical infrastructure set up relying primarily on the Fossil Fuel industry, which also has its fingers in Washington's cookie jar, making it so politically difficult to shift off fossil fuels even though we should and it really would be cheaper long term to do so with more haste. Which posters ideals? Are you talking about my comments on Nuclear power? Did you notice all my caveats? As an aside, we're still the global leader in emissions per capita and are 2nd worst overall in the world.

Huh???? We've already gone through our Industrial Revolution... My proposal???? Just what the hell is my proposal???

It's just so bizarre that they think it's a legitimate defense.

The average Chinese citizen is responsible for less than half the emissions the average American citizen is responsible. And none of this is to say that the Chinese shouldn't do something as well, but we aren't in China. The US clearly needs to do much more. Pretty obvious.

What's the point of your post? I'm not a nuclear power expert. Are you? I like nuclear power. But it's also pretty damn scary because of what it can do when things go wrong: Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island, etc. My point is that Nuclear power would be the ideal answer if we could ensure preventing accidents like those.

I have a lot to learn??? I'm certainly always trying to learn, but this post was pretty entertaining. No you aren't misreading it, but is it really more commendable to go from utterly all time atrocious to just terrible than to go from relatively okay to bad? US might be improving, but at a snail's pace and, as the United Nations report above states, it's not NEARLY fast enough and we're one of the 7 countries most carelessly putting the rest of the world at risk as far as climate change is concerned.

Since the title of this thread mentions how the Dems are trying to (I guess...?) distract from what will be extremely incriminating evidence coming out in the OIG regarding the 2016 election, I guess this belongs here:

I actually agree with you if we could put more safeguards in place and regulate it very strictly. If I were an absolute Pollyanna, I'd be 100% supportive of nuclear power. If used correctly there would be sooOOOOoooo much power provided to the world with relatively little resources and waste. However, the human factor and skepticism of regulation is what makes me hesitant. In an ideal world where we don't make mistakes, nuclear power is the obvious answer. I just wonder how well we would handle it.

Yes, it will be cheaper. Green energy is getting exponentially cheaper with time; can't copy the chart, but check Figure ES.5 on page 14 to see renewable costs in comparison with Fossil Fuel costs: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/30798/EGR19ESEN.pdf?sequence=13 There are these things called battery backups that would probably help there... plus, ya know, wind and sun aren't the only sources of renewable energy

Should probably start with ourselves since the US is by far the most responsible for emissions in the world on a per capita basis:

If Beasley and our passing offense gets shut down tomorrow, I'm going to assume the Dallas coaching staff trolls this message board and read your post and I'm holding you accountable if we lose