Jump to content

Foxx

Community Member
  • Posts

    11,545
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Foxx

  1. https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1222272542989221888
  2. he'll run you raged in circles if you let him.
  3. additionally here, to your last paragraph. you simply cannot impeach the president on the low standard the Dems are attempting to set. if you do, every time the House is held by the opposite party in the Executive, welcome to impeachment land. we are where we are today because everything that has brought us to this point has been the doings of a partisan witch hunt. not one Republican, at any point, has voted to go along with the Democrats. not one. unplug from the matrix, Bob. you have been had for the better part of four years now. actually much longer, but for this latest iteration, four years.
  4. except that it is not illegal to ask the Ukraine to investigate. you see, we have a treaty with them. Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex
  5. yeah, unfortunately the wife loves that crap. that and the commercials.
  6. the main objective of this impeachment is not Trump's removal, it never was. this is all about the 15 Republican Senators up for election this November. the Dems want sound bytes and to be able to claim moral superiority (which in and of itself is a joke (but their electorate is low information so...)), in the campaigns. additionally, just so we are clear here ... if you're being an idiot, i reserve the right to call you out on being one. extortion really does require one to be aware they are being coerced. i wasn't trying to be difficult. i explained my position and i didn't and still don't think it much of an ask to look into the timeline of the Kavanaugh confirmation. what you see with Bolton is right out of that playbook. it would not surprise me terribly if we see one or two more of these surprises before it is all said and done. that is just how the Dems operate.
  7. prolly fall asleep sometime after halftime with a belly full of all kinds of horderves.
  8. i hope you are wrong. can i prove it, nope. but i refuse to believe this grand universe of which we can only perceive a minute portion of (due to known limitations of the human condition), exists for what would not even be a blip on the terrestrial timescale, and would include the whole of the human experience, not just a single life.
  9. i understood your premise and apologies if i went off on a tangent, i just happen to think that the tangent is also a point of discussion worth pondering. being that believing in God comes with sort of a precondition, that being there is an afterlife, i think it makes my meandering a worthy topic of thought. i will back off it however as it really is your question, apologies if i launched it in another direction with my tangent.
  10. there is more to what you are implying, Bob. what you are regurgitating is Schiffty's narrative that is not in complete context, Bob.
  11. Bob again, kudos for admitting you were wrong on extortion. admitting being wrong can be difficult, if you have a lot invested in being right. i want to know the Ukraine truth and am on record for wanting them to call all the witnesses, lets put an end to the charade once and for all. however, that is not going to happen in a Senate Impeachment Trial, it just isn't. additionally, i don't think you would like the way the information points when it does come out. i happen to believe that the President sets policy, not lifelong appointed bureaucrats. thankfully, the Constitution agrees with me. additionally here, the President is responsible for investigating crime. if there was criminal activity in the Ukraine, as a whole lot of evidence seems to indicate, then the President would be derelict in his duty not to try and investigate it. being a political candidate for public office is not protection from suspicion, nor should it be. it has nothing to do with closing ones eyes and ears to information, after all we all know the House Democrats are going to continue to investigate Trump, have have plainly said so. more, what it is about, is the rule of law and following precedent. never before have 'new' witnesses been introduced to the Presidential Impeachment in the Senate. precedent has always been that the House does the investigative work and presents it to the Senate for trial. yes, during the Clinton impeachment they brought forward witnesses that had already testified to the special investigator but there were no new witnesses.
  12. are you saying US soldiers getting injured is something that is unique to the Trump Administration? have you ever seen swamp water drained before? it does tend to get murkier before it empties. that is the nature of swamp water. additionally, your not suggesting that Trump should have been able to clean up a cesspool of epic proportions that has grown over a period of roughly 100 years in less than 4 years are you?
  13. did you misread my post? i wasn't referring to the 'ShoutBox', at all. yeah, no. even if you get both houses, you are still never going to convince 67 senators to remove the President. enjoy the fantasy though.
  14. well, to be fair then... if you're going to be bannished to the dungeon and spew disparagements, have to the common courtesy to back them up when you are challenged on them.
  15. performing another drive-by, Shady?
  16. good for you, Bob. the road to recovery begins with honesty. i am reserving the right to rubut this post in fuller terms, after today's presentation is over.
  17. in fact, they were so extorted, they gave Trump everything he asked for and more even, Bob.
  18. Bob, again... you're an idiot, Bob.
  19. '...to be extorted one needs to be aware they are being extorted...' again, do i need to fetch the definition of extortion for you?
  20. https://twitter.com/HowleyReporter/status/1222134405755494400
  21. https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1222168132715937793
  22. #impeach! https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1222197553405595655 https://twitter.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/1222206221819817992
  23. of course intelligent life exists outside of Earth. do you believe that once you are done here on Earth that that is the end? no. the journey continues. what we know of the Universe would not amount to a drop of water in all the oceans of the world. what we are able to perceive would not amount to a drop of water in just one ocean. how many other dimensions reside in the Universe? don't limit your assumptions.
  24. https://twitter.com/RyanLizza/status/1221979579755180034
×
×
  • Create New...