Buffalo_Gal

That is pearl clutching? That is some extrapolation.

Sounds about right...

I don’t know where you’ve been getting your emoticons, but they they have been great. I especially like the hair on fire guy.

As others have pointed out to you, Bernie is most certainly a communist. Mao, Stalin, Marx, some people you may want to read up on since Bernie wants to reset America. ?

I went to Czechoslovakia and Poland back when they were communist. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, good about living under communist rule. The dogs and machine guns patrolling the tracks and streets, the shortages of food, clothing, basic hygiene needs... simply horrible. Imagine a city like Krakow having one (old) car on the main road. A family of four, five assigned a “house” (apartment) with two rooms. If you had connections, you might also have a bathroom. Anyone who feels there is anything redeeming about communism (or socialism) needs their head examined.

Stirring the pot ?

Reading twitter... Bernie is waayyyyy far ahead. long thread: final two tweets:

More than Dell. If you read the thread and articles, it appears to be India wants to keep China out of their IT business, but they need "help" to do so.

This could go on all campaign season:

That is a very interesting thread. US: I do not understand India's large tariffs on US agricultural goods. India cannot possibly produce enough to feed all their people. India is never going to amend their dairy stance. It really is cultural and religious. But, I suppose having it in there is a bargaining chip. India: I am not sure the US is going to give India greater access for importing grapes. That is a cash-crop in the US. Steel? After what Trump just went through to get US steel tariffs lowered elsewhere in the world? I think it would be in everyone's best interest for the US to help India with IT and squeeze China out.

People have been saying "brokered convention" for a while now, some, hopefully {waves hand wildly! ?}, some in horror. If Bernie can pay-off the super-delegates, things will get interesting. However, just recalling what happened to the super-delegates when the Obama people threatened them, I am not sure Bernie has that kind of party-power, although the Bernie Bros can be a nasty lot. IMO, he'd have to win it on delegates before the convention. We will know in about a month if it is possible. A 2020 DNC refresher: </snip> In 2020, there will be 4,750 delegates: 3,979 pledged delegates and 771 automatic delegates—more commonly known as superdelegates. To win the Democratic nomination, a presidential candidate must receive support from a majority of the pledged delegates on the first ballot: 1,991 pledged delegates.If the convention is contested and goes to a second ballot or more, automatic delegates will be able to vote and a candidate must receive majority support from all delegates: more than 2,375 votes. Roughly two-thirds of the delegates will have been allocated by the end of March 2020. </snip>

Bernie was briefed a month ago... and when asked why it came out now, said "I'll let you figure it out." LOL

?

Joey-B's got a lotta stories, too bad they are all fictional.

I have no idea what these three signed an NDA for... is this the sex favors women, or others?

LMAO Bloomberg says three women who signed non-disclosure agreements can be released U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg said on Friday that his company had reviewed its records and found three women who had signed non-disclosure agreements related to their complaints about statements he made personally. “If any of them want to be released from their NDA so that they can talk about those allegations, they should contact the company and they’ll be given a release,” Bloomberg said in a statement. “I’ve done a lot of reflecting on this issue over the past few days and I’ve decided that for as long as I’m running the company, we won’t offer confidentiality agreements to resolve claims of sexual harassment or misconduct going forward,” he added.

You do understand the response was to "threatening a witness." If the witness does not feel threatened, I am not sure how anyone can say he was threatened. Maybe you, Doc, the judge, all know better than he does how he felt about the exchange?

Except the Randy Credico told the court he didn't feel threatened by Stone (the "msm" is trying to dismiss this, claim it never happened, etc) </snip> I am writing to respectfully yet fervently implore you not to send Roger Stone to prison when he is sentenced before your Honor. I feel so strongly about this for a number reasons. Let me begin my saying I stand by my testimony in your courtroom on November 7-8, 2019. In fact, I stand by all of my testimony throughout the Mueller investigation and there pre-trial conversations I had with the DC prosecution team. That being said, there was more I wish I had the opportunity to express had I not been limited by the questions asked of me. Most notably was after Mr. Stone’s defense attorney asked I had ever thought Mr. Stone was going to steal or harm my dog Bianca. My answer was an emphatic “No.” At the time I was hoping he would follow that question with another asking if I had ever personally felt threatened by Mr. Stone. The answer would have been the same. I never in any way felt that stone himself posed a direct physical threat to me or to my dog. I chalked up his bellicose tirades to “Stone being Stone.” All bark and no bite! </snip>

He's probably paying top dollar to some marketing team to come up with these. Yikes. (there are a few in this twitter thread)