Ok
My definition of ball control is dependent on TOP and total offensive plays w some ypp/rush to pass ratios informing
Not sure exactly what yours is but if you didn't think that's exactly what they were doing vs KC we just won't agree
I believe we saw the absolute pinnacle of what this offense could accomplish playing ball control in the last divisional game vs one of the best defenses in the league in KC
they played a perfect game and still needed a freak fumble to keep it close. And that was w a better offensive roster. It's not going to work imo, we don't have the players or the coaching for it
Well that's for lack of trying
But if we had drafted such a guy I would be trying to extend him even w Allen on a deal, so to me the Vikings paying Jefferson is a no brainer
you are referring to mike as opposed to kyle i assume
regardless, even the top offensive minds in the game concede you need significant talent on that side of the ball...there is a lot of football that just comes down to beating the guy lining up from you
i mean what kind of wins are we talking about...i think you can say the same for every team in the league except the chiefs
is no team supposed to pay anybody? how are teams supposed to get better
drafting elite talent at important positions and then paying them top money/trading them for picks is what your FO should aspire to
unless you are one of those that thinks WRs are the new RB
Not that it didn't count, that it never existed
Many jurisdictions will hold that you cannot obtain consent from an intoxicated person, similar to how a contract signed under equivalent conditions would likely be unenforceable