Jump to content

GoBills808

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,570
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GoBills808

  1. Ok My definition of ball control is dependent on TOP and total offensive plays w some ypp/rush to pass ratios informing Not sure exactly what yours is but if you didn't think that's exactly what they were doing vs KC we just won't agree
  2. I believe we saw the absolute pinnacle of what this offense could accomplish playing ball control in the last divisional game vs one of the best defenses in the league in KC they played a perfect game and still needed a freak fumble to keep it close. And that was w a better offensive roster. It's not going to work imo, we don't have the players or the coaching for it
  3. I think he's saying running the ball is -ev compared to passing Plus it's boring af to watch ball control
  4. Well that's for lack of trying But if we had drafted such a guy I would be trying to extend him even w Allen on a deal, so to me the Vikings paying Jefferson is a no brainer
  5. I mean we actually have a QB, how would you say it's worked for us You have to try
  6. you are referring to mike as opposed to kyle i assume regardless, even the top offensive minds in the game concede you need significant talent on that side of the ball...there is a lot of football that just comes down to beating the guy lining up from you
  7. i mean what kind of wins are we talking about...i think you can say the same for every team in the league except the chiefs is no team supposed to pay anybody? how are teams supposed to get better
  8. well having Jefferson/Addison/Hockenson to throw at can only help these moves don't get made in a vacuum.
  9. drafting elite talent at important positions and then paying them top money/trading them for picks is what your FO should aspire to unless you are one of those that thinks WRs are the new RB
  10. did the drought era Bills ever take a QB w a top10 pick?
  11. you applaud the bills signing miller but not the vikings extending jefferson sounds about right
  12. Yes Adding another WR was more important than a safety We haven't been a safety away from a super bowl. It's not that important a position
  13. Not that it didn't count, that it never existed Many jurisdictions will hold that you cannot obtain consent from an intoxicated person, similar to how a contract signed under equivalent conditions would likely be unenforceable
  14. 😂😂Shakir was the 66th wideout in the league last season, why are you pretending he absolutely needs to be on the field above anyone else?
  15. We want a randy moss type because he's one of the best WRs ever and you want those kinds of players on your team
  16. You think people who want Allen to run less are fools?
  17. This is the logic of the whole 'top5 WR never won a SB' writ large
  18. Thurman thomas
  19. Came for the bad worthy takes stayed for the bad investment advice
  20. Good I'm naming my next 3 kids after you
  21. are you volunteering
×
×
  • Create New...