MAJBobby

ahhh the OTHER McConservatism.

I served 20 years and I have knelt, gone and got drinks, went and got food, talked, stretched, looked at my phone etc etc all during sporting event National Anthems what does that make me?

They should Attend. they Should sign him if he looks better than Barkley now will they? Doubt it.

and he has been saying that well since he took over. Reality is the way his staff calls games contradicts what he says.

I agree with the overall premise that Both need to be effective. However in today’s NFL I contend passing is more important. How many years have we led the league in Rushing or in the top 5 that we haven’t even come close to sniffing the playoffs let alone winning I agree with that as well in terms of what I would like the offense to look like. However I fear that McD doesn’t see it that way.

ok now did you adjust for rushing yards gained after a team is up 3 scores because they easily went up and down the field to score with their passing game? And therefore running the clock and in the 23 years since have been duplicating the same Model and has led to zero playoff wins and 1 playoff appearance.

so treading water. Brown and Beasley = Wood and Watkins maybe. knox - clay kroft - Pick any TE they had previously Singletary - McCoy Spain - Incognito Morse - Woods so upgrades I see some small contracts Nsekhe Felciano and Ford. so really they added a QB and still treaded water elsewhere

I know we have led league in Rushing multiple times when we didn’t make the playoffs. We also had very good defenses with those rushing teams. Guess what we didn’t do? We didn’t win. when was the last time we have had a dynamic passing game and I can point to you the last playoff win.

now the Biggest Myth in football is you have to be able to run the ball for Play Action to be effective. nope was saying that is what McD and Daboll do. The matchup says pass they pass. They don’t dictate they react.

so In a vaccum the way to score more points would be being able to go up the field more than 3 times vs being able to go up the field once.

this is a McD coached team. We don’t dictate we react and keep it close.

irrelevant in my point. Which would give you the opportunity to score more points. A RB going for 120 (good game by Running standards). Or a QB going for 320 (good yardage game by passing standards)

What is a better game in terms of trying to get to points often? a RB going for 120 or a QB going for 320

thoughts. Sure who has One loss over there in the NFC?

you mean a 30 ranked run defense that was playing cover 1 all game to stop the run?

I don’t think they are garbage. I do think their offense is below Average and their defense isn’t as good as some want to make it out to be. and I also am starting to question the vision of this HC and his staff

I am enjoying the season as well. Doesn’t mean though I can’t still be critical of areas.

I think McD would win the disagreements he was Hired first and the GM second. I figure the GM would be told to support the HC that was hired before.

and if that doesn’t happen?

sure it was what 2017 a first and a 3rd for Brandon Cooks 2017 traded a 2nd for Kony Ealy. There are a ton of history of them even recent trading high picks for players

what I can say based on readings. McD is in charge of Staff and Game day Roster reports directly to Pegulas Beane works with McD for players but does have the final say on final 53. Reports directly to Pegulas.

he is doing what he is told. If he misses they want him to miss long.

only reason I listen to that show for the guests. Otherwise if I wanted Bills Rose Takes I would read Chris Brown

yeah they had him. Talked about Allen and how he has to take that next step now

I am even fine with Beane making the OC hire. After two shots I can’t be convinced to let McD make another dip into the OC hiring route. they made mistakes too. Like passing on Metcalf for a trade up for Ford. And yet your QB still has no game breaker at WR.