DaBillsFanSince1973

he shouldn't start until 2019? I believe he will sit behind the fa they bring in (maybe brees) while being groomed and if peterman can handle the next level he will likely be the back up to the rookie. taylor wont be in a bills uni in 2018.

you need to give him until the bye. the kid will do no better but if taylor can not lead the offense to wins and they lose the next three, which is possible, then you bench him for the kid. allow him to get his licks and some time at the next level to reassure that he can be what he was drafted for, the back up to the rookie.

when he is gone after this season who will be the new player on the whipping post?

http://www.denverbroncos.com/team/roster/trevor-siemian/87d42081-706b-4395-b422-05b4c0acb2d8/

that will likely change this week.

I guess my point was why nit pick his game? we played him, they won. I believe, could be wrong but I believe the OP was comparing to justify both had a bad game and wanted to show cam was no better than taylor. both had a bad game, both faced a pretty stout defense. bills and taylor lost. also my point was, regardless of how he got there through good and bad games, he still managed to see the post season and sb. something I am pretty certain taylor will not do with the bills unless they make both this season. taylor is on the outs after the 2017 season I do believe. who cares if he's overrated, really? so you'll be discussing how overrated siemian is next week also?

what exactly are you trying to prove with this thread? that both taylor and cam had a bad game? that cam is losing his game? other than both having a bad game they have very little in common as far as size and ability to throw the football, cam wins there. one thing taylor will not do as cam has done with his team is lead them to the playoffs and a sb appearance. so nit picking cams game is pretty useless when trying to justify taylors bad game.

that was good stuff and agree with what he said with the exception of calling taylor, above avg? above avg runner? certainly not above avg passer. avg at best. I don't see it that way. nothing wrong with looking for an outside perspective.

man this thread is lit. I bet you couldn't even post a recipe before it was buried two pages back.

future (present) back up to the rookie they pick next draft. just my opinion of course. I'm not yet to the point where I would call for taylors benching. it begins with denver and from what I saw in the offense last week, that includes play calling, not all on taylor, I don't see a victory. they lose to denver and atl, maybe they beat cincy, maybe? give it the bye, make a decision then. they wouldn't be doing peterman any favors because he is not ready. this is not preseason but let him take his licks and get him adjusted to the next level so when his number is called, he can be at the ready? he'll back up the rookie. be the teams thigpen, well, he could be the next frank reich? back up none the less.

I mean, brady is an arrogant sob. you have to take in to consideration that some at the position are going to have their quirks. at the end of the day though, if they're getting the job done, winning games, it isn't all that much to be concerned with really.

how did he do yesterday against washington? was it two catches for 30 yds? woods had one catch for 8 yrds. not trying to knock him but since goffs go to guy yesterday was everett and gurley, watkins was no real factor. as for whether the zay play would of come out differently had watkins been there. you would like to believe it would of but then again I couldn't say with certainty watkins makes that catch either. time to move on from sammy watkins.

I actually like cams style. he's a character for sure. I do believe he's not 100% post surgery and it'll take a few more games, barring any other injury before he gets his game on. they have the defense, that's for sure.

time will tell. doubtful it's peterman, they likely drafted him for the (future) back up position, where he is now. I don't see him as a long term starter regardless of whether he's had a chance or not to prove it. my guess, it'll be a fa, one who can throw the football that will start in 2018 while the rookie is groomed for a season and peterman will be the rookies back up in 2109. 2019, where the team after two years of putting it all together may finally compete for a playoff berth? I know one thing, I don't have a whole hell of a lot of time for these rebuilds so I damn sure hope they get it right this time around. in the mean time, it will be pretty much the same bills football we've endured the last 17 years, likely finishing the next two seasons at or below .500. anything aside from that would be a real surprise to me.

no, no he wont be but you're entitled to believe that.

they did in a way. cut his pay and traded off his best wide receivers. you may not believe it was to set him up to fail but it didn't help his cause any. they knew going in to this season it was taylors last year. if fans think the roster was different this season wait until next season when they wipe the slate clean of any whaley remnants. dareus will be gone, taylor and mccoy and kyle will retire. they may keep a fa agent or two like ingognito and hughes? I just hope with the new QB they bring in a better OC, dennison doesn't impress me all that much although some may feel he can only do so much with what he has in a QB? taylor has likely seen his last opportunity to start in this league and will have to settle for a back up position elsewhere in 2018?

see no comparison, at all.

pretty rough around here when someone is ticked off by a coach clapping and motivating his team. here OP, just for you to tick you off.

dime a dozen. they need a QB so when the run game is stopped, the QB can make plays with his arm. it seems, as evident yesterday and as most have known, taylor struggles to do that, unfortunately. so, you'd best believe they will do everything they can to land a QB in the next draft.

what game were you watching?

calling fans stupid and a cult is really STUPID. you add no substance to this board, none. you're merely nothing but a whiner and if that is the reputation you want to have here, keep whining son. you're actually pretty good at it.

I'm a bills fan, 45+ years. does that give me the right to call out folks, you know, bills fans as a cult? also, your sucks, sucks, sucks mentality is beyond old around here. you whine too much kid and it doesn't change a thing. boo !@#$ing hoo I may not of liked the offense this week, may have already knew they didn't/don't have the answer at QB but am I going to cry like a little boy about it, no. I'll leave that up to the OP since he/she has been doing a good job at it.

half ass fan.

thier D will likely carry his team further than the bills D carries the team simply because they have the better QB. he's not overrated, he's just the better QB. the bills defense can only go as far as the offense goes and in yesterday's case, the bills only managed 3 points on offense, that's not going to get the job done!

say it ain't so, joe.