You didn't read the article? The point is that there are exceptions here and there, but the overall trends all point to loss of parity.
I agree. The Bills would be a better team if they had the same money that the Pats do.
i was just pointing out that lieberman changes his mind faster than it takes DC Tom to put on his special needs helmet.
but i did watch the healthcare debate on c-span. the finance committee debates were on tv. and in max baucus's own words this has been one of the most transparently built bills ever.
That guy is carrying the team right now. He's single handedly won the Bills two games. Reminds my of Ashton Yoboty at the beginning of last season.
It's nice while he's doing it. Eventually he'll get worn out and the the Bills will go back to the most pitiful show on earth.
Yes. Yes I do. They an possibly win. Also just as good of a chance that the players put the team in position to win and Dick does some boneheaded thing and the team loses.
Anyways.. I'd put it at 50/50 chance the Bills win.
The Early 1980s recession? I suppose I could give credit to Bush if you showed me what he did to fix that.
See the fact that you think that dinky recession in 2001 was anything big (or big to recover from) just shows your ignorance. You called it "last worst recession since the depression". WTF?
By the way, why is there a recession at the start of every Republican presidency lately?
LOL. Yes. Exactly.
The way I see it .. the only way to get the money together is for us to pick someone we trust, and then each Bills fan to send $2000 bucks to that person and then hope it's enough.
(also, Gregg Easterbrook is b-lo born)
Well... if any significant portion of the society ever starts question the moral implications of those things, we'll have a discussion on them. For now, nobody is, so stop making **** up.
would be a good pickup... and well worth the trade if we had an offense that could move the ball. but without an offense, it would just be a waste to trade for him.
i got a boner reading this one..
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story...ick_and_wrong/1?
other than giving you a fake strawman to attack ... that system you propose makes no sense. nobody is saying we should tell doctors how to care for anyone, and no one is saying we should nationalize the doctors. stop making **** up.
.... this statement makes me think you don't know how the insurance industry works. That you don't know how they make their profits. Insurance is not a commodity that you produce. There is no shortage of money with this. 30 Million more people being insured is also 30 million more paying them money.
I'm in. But no way it's enough to solve the problems. This is a couple drops in the bucket.
Don't say **** that isn't true. There is no windfall tax in any of the bills.
And what of the morality of having for-profit insurance? Do you like the idea of a guy at some insurance company looking at your claim and having the legal ability to say "nah, I won't pay this.. I'll make more money if I don't"?
Lol. So... aside from the fact that you have been brainwashed and mentally conditioned to think the way you do... where do your numbers come from to say "It doesn't"? Do you not believe that competition in a capitalist system will lower costs?
and .. I guess I'll go with Chef Jim's response to KD above .. ...
Given the 45,000 people that the insurance industry kills every year, those are just really harsh words from Chef Jim. Really devastating. I'm sure those execs are shaking in their boots, he really stuck it to them.