Berg

Well I wouldn't include you because you ditched me last month.

Woman cuts arms off of 11 month old daughter - USA Today

Don't you remember? GW was the problem. I read it right here on this board. Oh and Gilbride too. So many people said "anyone but GW will be an upgrade".

WHAT????? Inspections don't work?????

In Sept, Glenn took a new job with Raytheon on the program I work on, and it includes a training program that had him here in Denver for a few weeks then out to SoCal for 6 weeks of formal training. He doesn't have regular access to the internet currently, so I am sure that is most of it. Once he is back home, I suspect he'll post more.

USAF AD 1989-1996 USAFR 1996 - present

My point is your sample set is way too small to draw any sort of conclusion, your historical data is subjective, and I submit you are ignoring analogous occurences elsewhere in nature that would run contrary to your argument. Other than that I agree with you...

Why is it that it is very commonly argued that what we humans do is outside the realm of nature? I believe we should use our most significant biological asset - our brain (ok for some anyway) - just as other organisms use their strength, speed, senses, roots, or whatever. Are we not natural My belief is that the universe is the grand equalizer. We focus so much on our puny concept of reality and time that we don't realize things will all balance out in the universe's own good time. PS - 'sup BiB

For those who believe in God, why do you think <he> gave humankind a brain? Assuming we have freewill, with an omniscient supreme being, don't you think this was anticipated? If the capability exists within the human physiology to support extension of a lifespan, I find it trite to argue against it because of finances (i.e. Social Security), the job market, or overpopulation. It is akin to saying why bring a baby into a world where you know he/she will experience hunger, pain, sadness, disappointment, violence, etc. The Earth's ecosystem will adapt over a period of time to whatever we do, and so must we or become extinct. I don't see the cause for fear here.

Is this a trick question or "fuzzy math"?

No Federal involvement PERIOD. States, well, that's a more complex question. My druthers would be they stay out too.

Simple. This is not something the Federal Government should be involved in.

too bad it's a hoax

Air Force, 8years active, 7 years reserve (still in reserves).

Did you see some of those haircuts???

You can work out here with me in Red Colorado, with the Rockies and John Elway.

Lori, From what I understand (I think it came from CNN), Provisional ballots are ONLY counted if there is a need (no clue how they determine that). But, they are handled differently from absentee.

Sorry but that example is not bipartisanship.

Popular vote means squat in deciding our President. Don't fool yourself, it was close.

Yeah we know you'd be here. You're a bipartisan !@#$.

Coors took a position and I missed it?? I couldn't vote for the guy just because I never heard anything but "aw, shucks, I'm a straightforward, honest guy who isn't a politician".

But that's not just today. KTD is always like that. Question is, how many conservative/righties/Bushies would be here taking lumps had things gone the other way? I'm thinking there'd be some crickets from the right in that scenario as well.

I saw another one several days before the election, but just never got around to posting it. I saw it on the Headline News ticker, so I'll probably not get the details right. Some organization - National Readers Review?? - polls children before every election. They (the children) have correctly predicted the US Presidential winner ever since the 30s I think. This year, 60% were for Bush. At least that one has some measure of applicability, since I suspect most kids hear something from their parents about candidates and parrot it to a certain degree.

Spare us the drama....on both sides

Kerry could make that up in Cuyahoga alone