Scenario one: We have the ninth pick and use it on Sammy Watkins because he fell to us (unlikely). Then next year we use our number one to draft Joe Schmoe. Scenario two: We trade our one and four from next year and swap spots 4 for 9 and draft Sammy, because it was unlikely he would be there at 9. In both we drafted Sammy with OUR pick. In one the pick was in our spot(unlikely), in the other we paid a price to move up 5 spots. What is different? instead of drafting Joe Schmoe number one next year Cleveland will. That was the cost, our 4 and 9 next year. Our pick this year didn't cost a thing, it was ours either way. I don't understand why people keep saying we gave away 2 number ones. No we didn't- we got Sammy and gave away ONE number one!! Saying this years number one was part of the cost ridiculous. Using the logic some are using, RG3 cost FOUR number ones. The pick to draft him and the three to move up. Charging The Bills 2 number ones because they actually drafted the guy they traded for is ludicrous.