GunnerBill

You know the upside? He can play ball.

When?

Yea his only shot is a lesser league to get some experience and see some stuff. I said USFL... but CFL similar.

He can provide that from the practice squad.

I don't buy that Morrow is baked in too.

Agreed. His best plays in college were often as a big slot. He isn't a great release guy or a good route runner. Free releases and run to space from the slot is the way to boost his production.

Not yet. He will tho. I'd PS him.

In June I'd have agreed. But having seen Hamler in pre-season and spoken to people who were in camp I don't think there is any objective basis for it. I like the idea of Hamler. The reality was very, very meh.

But we don't have 6 capable guys.

Why?

There were not 6 worthy of a roster spot. There might not be 5 worthy but I tend to give MVS a bit more a pass just because he does have some history of production but I wouldn't be adverse to bringing someone in from outside for that spot.

These cuts make zero impact on that though. They are cutting guys who ain't up to it.

Good. He showed zero.

Ben D will be. Trubisky will be on the roster but not healthy the first couple of weeks Ben DiNucci will be an elevated PSer.

I'd like to see him back on the PS.

Yea I doubt that too. His average depth per target jumped up SIGNIFICANTLY under Brady compared to Dorsey.

I drafted Shakir late in my first draft last night. I think the reasons he is valued a bit lower are a) lack of name recognition; b) lack of track record - a non-Bills fan casual doesn't know his numbers last year basically came in half a season; and c) a feeling he might catch lots of balls but not have lots of yards or touchdowns. I intend to use him as my high floor flex. He's gonna have 5 or 6 catches most weeks IMO and in PPR leagues that has value.

Correct. He was also before 2020 when this analysis starts.

He started very well. From those I speak to he faded later into camp and his pre-season games were no bueno.

He will be back on the PS I think. And he might get elevated for the first two games as Josh's backup if Mitch isn't ready.

Yep. If you were a smart NFL team you would sign him and agree that you will allow him to jointly sign with a USFL team next spring on the proviso that team plays him. I'm not sure if seeing things at that standard will fully develop him for an NFL standard but it at least gives him a chance to play, develop, see different defenses and try to speed up his processing. I agree. They rarely get better. But to even have a chance to get better he (or any other slow processor) would have to actually get on the field and I don't think there is a place to develop those processing skills. I think the spring league idea is good for him. It might never get him to NFL level but it is a way to get some exposure and try to learn.

I am with you on this. Ty Johnson is a total JAG, I'd take my chances on the younger guy. It feels like Johnson might be factoring into the kick return battle though which would tilt the thinking.

It is probably on the low side but you'd be trying to sell it to New Orleans as part of getting their franchise QB. And by the trade deadline when you'd be making the offer this season is down the pan for them, so it is really one year of cost control plus the option (which while controlled it not cheap). I don't think it would take a 1st a 2nd and a 3rd. But if it was felt he was on the block someone might give them a 1st. I dunno. It only works if the Saints are dreadful and planning for a teardown.

Hamler's only really impressive play of the pre-season where he showed any explosiveness to me is the running back play where he got stopped short by the pylon. When they have thrown it to him in traffic he has demonstrated a lack of vision and a lack of burst and we haven't had chance to see if he can separate deep. I get it you think we need speed and explosiveness (we definitely do) and you wan Hamler to be an option to provide that. So do I. But I have to separate what I want from what I have seen and I just haven't seen what I would have hoped to in order to give me confidence about him making an impact in the regular season. Putting him on the roster is a wing and a prayer to me. I understand the argument for Patrick a little more. But it is the same argument as for MVS. It is look at what he has done before - if he could repeat that it'd be good. I agree. It would. But can he? And there are reasons to be sceptical on both of them. But if he is cut, sure I'm open to it. I'm open to the Metchie idea floated earlier too. But at this stage these are all punts. A guy guaranteed to improve us beyond a below average top 4 and a mess behind them is unlikely to land in our lap sadly. I think they have to hope to get to trade deadline in good shape and see if there is a deal to be done at that point. Here's an idea if the Saints totally suck would they take Minnesota's 2nd for Chris Olave? Likely a high 2nd round pick? Might help them have ammunition for a Quarterback with a new regime next year? Yea we can't absorb that. And tbh he isn't worth that.

Hmmm. See the problem with this (and believe me I am no MVS fan) is that your argument for Patrick is "look what he did before missing two years of football with separate serious injuries and turning 30" at the same time as arguing MVS shouldn't be here on past performance. And while I don't particularly think MVS has done much this summer to seal a roster spot what has Hamler done? 5 catches on 6 targets for 5.8 yards a play. His calling card is supposed to be speed and explosiveness and we haven't seen it. I know you thinl I have something against him, but I don't. I had a 2nd round grade on him coming out. I liked him. Find the thread where we signed him - I was in favour it was a shot worth taking. But he hasn't shown anything to earn a shot. I genuinely would consider only rostering 4 receivers if it wasn't for Samuel's foot. See if we can find something worth having on the scrap heap. If that's a punt on Patrick fine. If it's a punt on someone else fine. But the receiver situation is a mess.