BarleyNY

First, I’d say that looking at the draft to solve short term needs is generally ineffective and leads to reaches and other mistakes. The Bills have made this mistake in the last couple of drafts with their early picks. I’m not saying that all of the players won’t work out, but they certainly painted themselves into a couple of corners. The draft should be for long term roster building and the deficiencies on offense show a lack of attention over the long term to those needs.

Seems like an offense that was more effective would’ve helped in two of the three games you referenced. The other one - KC last season - wasn’t a personnel issue, it was a coaching error. So an offense that could keep KC or Cincy’s offense off the field could’ve been the difference but in both games. I do not see how any team wins in today’s NFL by prioritizing defense over offense. I am not sure how anyone can equate hoping players with significant limitations and later round picks work out on offense versus throwing far more high draft picks and free agent dollars at the defense. As for Dorsey and his hiring, I agree that we should expect more out of the offensive scheme and play calling. That said, some more talent to work with is also needed. Dorsey and Allen were put in a spot where, compared to the defense, they were expected to do more with less. That was not exactly the way I’d have set up a rookie OC for success. And here’s the thing about that - as a first time OC getting his big break Dorsey was not in a position to make any demands when he took the job. A more experienced coach would’ve made demands as a condition of taking the jobs including improvements to offensive personnel. You should probably just reread what I wrote - more slowly.

I’ve mentioned this in other threads, but think it’s worth having a discussion about on its own. While it is easy to look at what could have been in previous drafts and even rightly point out alternate picks we wanted at the time, I think that this regime’s drafting has been solid overall. That’s more a function of how bad most drafts are for most teams than anything exceptional done by the Bills. Seriously, look it up. Every team misses a lot. But I don’t want to discuss that here. What I want to discuss is the focus on using so many high picks and other resources on the the defense at the expense of the offense. Defense: 2 firsts spent on CBs, a first at MLB, 2 firsts, 2 seconds a huge FA signing on the DL versus 1 first on a QB, a first traded for a WR, 2 seconds spent on the OL (one of which busted) and 1 second on a RB. To me it looks like the defensive success the Bills have had is directly due to the resources spent on it. If that’s what a team needs to do to find success, then it’s the talent and not the coaching. Te opportunity cost of using those resources on the offense is huge IMO. The deficiencies we see at OL and WR are because of what was spent on the defense. Imagine what the offense would look like if you flip the resource allocation - or just even it up. Today’s NFL is not a league where you win a SB by building a pristine defense and then using the leftovers to support your FQB. This has been my single greatest point of frustration with this Bills regime. IMO this has to change or the Bills are not going to get a championship with Allen. I think this is what Diggs alluded to when he talked about KC having an offensive HC.

Would absolutely love Smith-Njigba on this team. Perfect fit IMO. He could fall to the Bills - or close enough to go get - because he’s looked at as a “slot only WR”.

I think the fans who have primarily looked at the handful of highly productive games Davis has had tend to overvalue him. Or at least they did last off-season. Most of those fans now undervalue him because he didn’t sustain anything close to the level of production he had against KC in the AFCC game. The reality is that he’s very good at some aspects of the WR job and poor at others. Naturally he’s going to have some favorable matchups in some games where what he does well works. But he’s going to have a lot of games where he’s limited. Things were worse in that regard this past season. Even though he got more opportunities as a starter, defenses planned better for him and were able to limit his production. So we don’t have a stud WR2 in him, but he’s got a place in the NFL for sure. Unfortunately he’s not a guy I want to see the Bills pay to stick around. He’s an okay outside WR, but he shouldn’t be a team’s #2 receiving option - and I wouldn’t pay him anything close to Spotrac’s estimate.

I think the best case - and still realistic - scenario is: LT - Dawkins LG - Bates C - Morse plus a day 2 draft pick to take over in a year or two RG - FA like Nate Davis (4/$30M) RT - Brown plus competition like Jermaine Eluemunor (2/$8M)

Tag, for sure. Him playing on the tag is another matter entirely. He sat out the end of the season and playoffs, he’ll be happy to sit again. I see him pushing back and not signing the tag right away. He’ll say he wants traded to a team that will pay him if the Ravens won’t. Then he either gets traded or sits until right before the season starts. That would put the Ravens in a big bind as they will have a new OC installing a new offense.

I appreciate all the work you did on this. Lotta good stuff, but you’re going to be very surprised when Brissett gets a job as a starter this coming season. He was very a very efficient, albeit limited, QB. Likely he will get signed as a Bridge QB, but he could wind up being the best option for a team that is otherwise stuck with a Wentz or Darnold level QB. Edited to add: Cards just hired Drew Petzing, Browns QB coach, as their OC. He worked very well with Brissett. I expect him to be the QB in ‘Zona until Murray gets healthy enough to play again. Makes a ton of sense now.

That’s fair. But here’s my counter: When does McDermott, Frazier & Co. have to do something with less like the offense has had to? 2 firsts spent on CBs, a first at MLB, 2 firsts, 2 seconds a huge FA signing on the DL versus 1 first on a QB, a first traded for a WR, 2 seconds spent on the OL (one of which busted) and 1 second on a RB. My take is that defensive success the Bills have had is due directly to the resources spent on it. If that’s what a team needs to do to find success, then it’s the talent and not the coaching. The other side of that coin is the opportunity cost of using those resources on the offense. The deficiencies we see at OL and WR are because of what was spent on the defense. The job Daboll did to help this offense succeed should not be discounted. That was very much an uphill battle - even with Allen and Diggs - versus what the defensive side had to do. Today’s NFL is not a league where you win a SB by building a pristine defense and then using the leftovers to support your FQB. This has been my single greatest point of frustration with this Bills regime. My fear with Edmunds hitting FA is that this regime will pay whatever it takes to retain him because McDermott needs an MLB like him to run his defense. Or they’ll use another first round pick (or more with a trade up) to replace him.

If there’s a quality OC available who would insist on the Bills fixing the OL and acquiring another playmaker on that side of the ball, then that’s my choice. I know that’s not the question asked, but reality is that several things need to happen.

I’d certainly rather those resources get poured into the offense, but I think the Bills are probably going to re-sign Edmunds. Maybe some team gets stupid with a contract offer and the Bills bow out, but I think they value him greatly - IMO probably a lot more than he’s really worth.

Good example. I expect Edmunds contract to look an awful lot like the Roquan deal.

No special cap gymnastics will be necessary if they re-sign Edmunds (which I think is likely). It is pretty standard practice to minimize the first and second year cap hits on contracts that are 5 years or longer.

Yes. The league doesn’t like it, but allows it - and it is within the rules. The problem is that the franchise tag is $14.46M for a safety. No one will trade for Poyer with that contract. The other option would be to use a transition tag and allow him to negotiate with other teams. Then we would have the option to match and keep him. $11.867M to do that. I think even the TT is above what the Bills will pay for Poyer. I think they’ll do right by him and not tag him. They can let him see what he can get in FA and ask for a last look. I think the Bills part ways with him though - unless his injury drives down his price a lot more than I expect.

He was an exclusive rights free agent. No negotiation. That’s the take-it-or-leave-it deal they get.

Chick with a pierced tongue and, I dunno, maybe see Europe and New Zealand.

https://carlsbadcravings.com/chicken-and-broccoli/ I’d highly recommend this chicken and broccoli stir fry recipe. I could eat it every week. Note that she means Mirin when she calls for Japanese wine.

The notion of him being “a top candidate” for a DC job seemed like nothing more than some PR Rex or his agent had put out there. I’d be floored if any team seriously considered him.

Taking a chance on OBJ isn’t the worst idea if he’s playing on an incentive laden contract. But relying on him is another matter entirely. Sign him and the prudent course of action still would be to add more young talent on day 1 or 2 of the draft.

I agree that there are reasons Miami might not be Carr’s optimal choice. The NFC is certainly much more desirable from the standpoint of how he’d rank among QBs in the conference. Tua is much less a factor however. If Miami makes a move for a QB like Carr, then they’re moving on from him. It’s over. Of course the biggest advantages of going to Miami are Hill, Waddle and a very QB friendly offense. So there’s a lot to be said for choosing the Dolphins if they’re interested.

Not me. Any monetary investment from the Pegulas will be minimal. In disclosing the general breakdown of contributing sources to fund the stadium I couldn’t help but notice that included within the Pegulas $350M contribution was revenue from the personal seat licenses. I don’t know what their initial revenue from the PSLs will be, but Mercedes Benz stadium in Atlanta netted $273M from them. Teams also get to resell any that fans forfeit so it can be a future revenue stream in the event that the team hits hard times and eventually rebounds. Edited to add: I understand that this is the cost of having an NFL team. It just sucks and I can see why some cities are happy to not have to deal with a franchise in their city.

Also Miami has precious little draft capital so it would be difficult to trade for a QB. They have to find someone to play QB besides Tua and they don’t pick until 52 so Carr makes a lot of sense for them.

While Gibbs would be an extremely depressing pick at 27, I do think that RB needs to be addressed in some way(s). Motor is gone unless he comes back cheap. Hines is likely a cut unless he takes a pay cut. Cook would be a decent option for one of our two top RBs if not for his terrible pass pro. The RB FA market should yield an option at very reasonable cost. Ditto day 3 of the draft. And maybe Cook can clean up his pass pro too.

I wonder if his advice about focusing on our own jobs extends to Sundays at 1 pm? I mean, it is odd to hear that fans are not allowed to have their own opinions about something that they consume. It’s even more confusing to hear that from someone making a very comfortable living off of that product.

That's fair. And I think it’s reasonable to expect the coaches and FO to stay the course until we see otherwise.