Jump to content

HamSandwhich

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,079
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HamSandwhich

  1. 4 entries from the Bills, not bad. Enjoyed reading them, thanks!
  2. More power to ya, I would start Stafford myself just for the meer fact that TT is an unknown commodity at this point. I hope he's everything we hope he is and you win your fantasy league matchup this week solely on the amazing play of TT.
  3. What a Debbie downer!
  4. It seems to me, the only thing they have to rely on is that these things can't be proved. Everyone knows there is smoke, matter of time that the fire will show itself, and I think it will be a much bigger fire than expected. Someone will come forward (McNally) or someone will slip up, or someone will be come estranged and disgruntled and blow the roof off this organization. It will be glorious! As Promo said earlier: DENY DENY DENY is the Cheatriot battle cry, and the Cheatriot way.
  5. I guess I should clarify, I think that those will running yards will come primarily from non-designed running plays.
  6. This is EXACTLY what I was going to post. He just needs someone to be in the cellar I guess. The Bills and their past are easy targets. Unfortunately, those outside of WNY are not going to disagree.
  7. I'm a little more worried that he hasn't been able to build chemistry with them yet. Could be a little off in the first game. Also, I think Roman will limit his pass attempts in his first live action and try to run the ball to keep the Colts O off the filed. I think its more 150-170 yds passing He'll likely take off more due to his issues with chemistry, I'm thinking 120-130 yds running 1 TD and 2 INTs passing. Running game will rule the day...
  8. Have you been alcoholing too much drink?
  9. It is time...regular season is upon us. This thread proves it!!!
  10. Wow, that would be a very bad day if he was cut today. My thoughts are with the Carpenters. It's never easy to lose a family member like that.
  11. That's what I mean by BS. The ruling creates a slippery slope that allows even women beaters to appeal. Sickening. Did you read the article though, he was punished under the "detrimental to the league" rules, not under the domestic violence rules.
  12. This is the kind of BS that will come of the ruling... http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/03/greg-hardy-considering-an-appeal-of-his-four-game-suspension/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs
  13. This is semantics. There was language about conduct detrimental to the league, but apparently cheating is not detrimental.
  14. Again, so you're saying that the NFL has to come up with all conceivable ways that players can try give themselves and advantage and apply a punishment for each and every one? How ridiculous is that? So everyone gets a get out of jail free card as long as it's the first time it happened? Dumb dumb dumb
  15. Careful what you wish for. I would like to think our organization is a stand up organization. So far they are, until they aren't. That could come back and bite. This ruling is bull though!
  16. This is a real problem. So let me get this straight...you have to think of everything there is that could happen (even things that are not available yet or have not been dreamed of yet) and make sure you apply a punishment for each and everyone in order for it to stick? That's a bunch of bull!!!
  17. What would a "stay" mean? HE still has to serve the suspension?
  18. Like a long drawn out gong?
  19. Actually, Karlos being 2 inches shorter and having about the same weight would mean he is bulkier which is good for bowling people over!
  20. Hahaha! This is absolutely fantastic!
×
×
  • Create New...