djp14150

The Bills have a lot more money to pay out to make it go away.

nobody has ever used your cell phone to talk to someone? How do you know it was him on the phone? If police or lawyers were involved in a known illegal act of recording a phone call they should be fired/ disbarred are you saying everything people say must be true he coukd have mentioned and because he knew of people who tested positive for it. false accusations are much much higher than that…especially if you include unreported incidents. um 90% is not beyond a reasonable doubt

How is it any different? youwant someone fired because he’s being accused of something without knowing if this is even true

So choose lynching…..

Do we know for a fact it was him who replied? if he knew this girl and knew this number he coukd have said I’m not answering this. But one of his buddy did the talking.

College gang rapes get priority potential high profile case gets priority The police had in by the start of November 10 months ago. blame them then for the delay.

in this country there is a principle of innocence until proven guilty…do you understand this? just because someone says something does not mean it’s true. There have bern many many examples of false accusations you are blindly accusing him when you know nothing. have you ever been accused of something you did not do?

to add… she does the rape kit after this but it goes nowhere probably because of a lack of dna. She didn’t know the guys. nfl drsft occurs. San Diego mentions on the news of local college pkayers drsfted. She sees him in an interview on local news she recognizes him from the party and knows he was one she talked to so she says he was involved…she has littlrpe memory of the incident. She remembered him befire she got drunk.

option 3…. he heard about this incident around school he knew he wasn’t the person who did it why e rn bring up such an incident unless he is accused of doing this

Police would have to obtain a warrant to record only if that is allowed under California law without others consent. The police can not just record a phone call without your consent or warrant. Doing so knowingly violates the law which could affect the police careers involved. It’s the same as if police planted evidence on you like slipping drugs in your pocket then claiming the found it on you. Obtaining evidence illegally is in inadmissible in court including other evidence found directly from that illegal act.

it’s actually quite common for young women to claim rape when sex occurs for various other reasons. Sometimes itwas rape, it could have bern regrettable sex or she might have bern impaired somehow and don’t remember. Some come out after where she thought relationship and it was a one night stand. To him. the police doing phone calls is illegal on many levels without consent or warrant. If they did this they should be fired. if he knew about the sex and maybe knew who did it and found out this person has an std would be a wa6 fir him to say to get checked. She might be accusing him because he was a person she remembers or now knows because he got drsfted in the nfl so $$$ reappears in her eyes. if she did a rape kit at a hospital right after the incident the police are informed about this.

Exonerated meaning absolved from blame

It smells of (1) no case for criminal charges on rape/ sex assault (2) even sued in civil court and found guilty he can file bankruptcy and it doesn't get paid. He said/ sghe said cases are weak. As a juror I would never convict of all the evidence was she said so given she was drunk and facial recognition is very weak. that leaves only the PR route to get a settlement. They release a recording obtained illegally to try and get a pay out.

False any recordings where both parties did not agree can not be used…even after being released like this.

Califirnia is a two party consent state so the calls recorded can’t be used as evidence that should apply in civil cases too

What does the law define as sex?

Except the tv story seems to imply otherwise. this particular DA might have gotten assigned to the case today. i don’t buy this was not known by the office. This surfaced into the news over a month ago at least. A few months ago thr police got evidence so DAs are usually involved early on in these things.

I thought the report was they got it months ago.

I would assume shortly after she would have gotten an atty prior to any media interviews taking place and they woukd have gotten tapes of the full interview.

Can he punt?

i don’t know California law but there are exceptions such as meeting the person in a bar drinking alcohol you can assume they are 21.

big question I have….if they have DNA,they should have tested people accused by now. And they should have been charges by now. it’s always innocent until proven guilty. she mentioned his name because she probably already knew him at the party. That does not mean he is the one who did it. by the way, he’s now in the NFL so lawyer is willing to sue because he does have money. See if they can settle for a payday.

If they told you to jump off a bridge…..??

OP has him in on his fantasy team…. i agree.

I’d rather break a leg…..