Jump to content

FireChan

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,609
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FireChan

  1. Move along? From the one post I made on the subject? What do you call the Crusader who crusades against Crusaders? This is windmill on windmill crime, at best. Yo, time to GTFOI, mate. Fun's over. Seriously dude? Enough. Move on.
  2. No, actually. My point was eloquently stated in one post by yours truly. Surprised you missed it.
  3. I would struggle mightily to buy that. Jack was the best player in the draft in terms of talent. Taking scheme specific players over talent is a horrendous draft strategy.
  4. He wouldn't have all that guaranteed money if he wasn't a first rounder, Doc. Which was the whole point.
  5. If the Bills didn't overdraft EJ in the first, he would've been cut long before Mettenberger. Give me Mett.
  6. That's stupid. Shaq long term will probably be fine. I do find the decision to go with the "safer, starter quality, lesser talent" less palatable when 2 of those 3 things turn out to be not true, and that doesn't include "lesser talent."
  7. Wynn didn't fit the scheme as an OLB.
  8. Perhaps I'm biased because I wanted him at #19, but these current events only strengthen that.
  9. If that's the argument, why not take Jack?
  10. Misquoted. It was "Veteran's Day one starter."
  11. He didn't even mention apartheid, idiot.
  12. I'm not conned by anybody, talk about not reading posts. Scott Walker was your candidate of choice? The one whose campaign officially lasted a whole 2 months? Sure, he would've been media bulletproof. Especially with the Ultrasound law. Would've done real well with the progressive media.
  13. By writing this, I am now 99% certain you actually are my wife.
  14. Don't bother. LA lives in a world where the media would be posting that Cruz and Christie are the bestest candidates in the whole wide world if meany Donald didn't beat them.
  15. Dalton too high? He's always been pretty consistent and he was dominating last year. I love Cutty. Romo is probably a little low. I could go any order with that gaggle of youths.
  16. Nope. But I do find it funny. Especially because they just write these things in rotations for clicks.
  17. Expert predicts the Bills won't be good. Called an idiot. Bills miss the playoffs. Rinse and repeat.
  18. I realize you lean guilty. That's obvious. I'm asking if you lean guilty enough to cast a vote that way.
  19. It was a terrible look, but also just one play. Hard to say, really.
  20. The whole thing was broadcasted. We all know what happened. Shoot your shot.
  21. Zimmerman broke no laws. What he should or should not have done is immaterial to the verdict. You don't know he was "aggressive" or what that would even entail. The evidence against him was shaky at best. We will never know if the jury was right or wrong. All we know is that a jury of his peers did not believe beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed a crime, and that's the standard we live by. Honest question, for you and RLB. If you were on that jury, do you vote guilty? You don't have a shred of doubt this was just some !@#$ who acted like an !@#$, and then some other !@#$ scuffled with him and the original !@#$ got beat up?
  22. Tannehill is already Alex Smith's spiritual successor. High floor, low ceiling, get what you get kind of guy. Then again, we all said that with Dalton and he turned it up out of nowhere. Consistency is so key. When a QB like Stafford, Flacco, Eli or Cutler are "on," they can outduel any future HoFer like Peyton, Brady, Rodgers, Brees. They just aren't "on" 6-8 games a year compared to the truly elite who have 2-4 bad games in a normal season. I see Bortles being a boom or bust guy more than any of them. He really slings it around. He could be the guy who gets hot and a little lucky at the right time and win a SB over a more consistent, but smaller highs player like Bridgewater.
×
×
  • Create New...