B-Man

A nice idea Mr. President. But free speech laws take precedent. You are wrong here.

Bye bye

.

.

.

Truth.

Quick update, Department of Government Efficiency still hard at work.

LOL

I would politely point that that shows pretty well how foolish it is to post in his threads.

Justice Jackson Writes Opinions For Her Media Fanbase, Not Everyday Americans by Shawn Fleetwood In roughly three years, Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has established herself as one of the most recognized members of the Supreme Court — and not in a good way. Despite being the most junior justice on the high court, Jackson has regularly gone out of her way to thumb her nose at her colleagues for upholding America’s constitutional framework. Whether it be through public comments or poorly written opinions, the Biden appointee has shown little respect for the longstanding traditions and collegiality that have defined SCOTUS for generations. {snip} While it’s not uncommon for justices to explain their disagreements and problems with the opposing side’s legal rationale in their opinions, Jackson’s dissent (and this isn’t the first time) takes on another level of snide that’s unbecoming of a junior justice. She went on to effectively accuse her colleagues in the majority of abandoning all semblance of proper jurisprudence and respect for the law in order to bend over backwards for the Trump administration. It’s pretty telling that none of the other justices in the dissent signed onto Jackson’s tirade. While they may share ideological similarities, even Sotomayor and Kagan recognize the importance of respecting and getting along with their conservative-leaning colleagues — especially given that these are lifetime appointments. But for Jackson, that seemingly matters very little. https://thefederalist.com/2025/08/22/justice-jackson-writes-opinions-for-her-media-fanbase-not-everyday-americans/

Why didn't loser Homegrown or sucker Tibs post this ? They were wrong (AGAIN) This is what you can do when you free up government money After cutting union contracts, VA redirects $45M to veterans by Brett Rowland U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs officials announced Friday that the agency is redirecting nearly $45 million from public union costs to care for veterans. "VA staff will now get to spend more time with Veterans, VA facilities can focus on treating Veterans, and VA can manage its staff according to Veterans' needs and national security requirements, not union demands," VA Secretary Doug Collins said. Earlier this month, Veterans Affairs canceled its contracts with most unions on Wednesday, saying the unions fight against the best interests of veterans. When VA canceled those contacts, it cut the number of VA bargaining unit employees from about 375,000 to about 7,000. https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_53beea8a-d453-41b0-8e4d-5746a68f93e9.html https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_3f5e544d-8193-468f-9657-aa8e27475c1c.html

THEY ATE IT UP.

OOF !

Must have taken a bathroom break.

Libspeak: "They" did it. Not, I myself made a very poor business decision and caused my company to lose 1/5th of it's value. Nope. It's you crazy crackers (pun intended) that don't understand progress when you see it. .

BUMP

You mean Homegander left 16 consecutive posts on this vital (disproved) subject, and NOBODY commented on his posts ? we'll see if the ("disproved) bait gets him to post here.

I am going to go with the obvious answer...........................it's ALL of his threads. It will be even funnier when he posts in this thread.