B-Man

It’s never the actor, it’s always the object.

.

I forget. Are the walls closing in? or Is the foundation under him cracking ?

This is very simple. Round&round has opened wide and accepted the Police's version. He is ignoring a near decade of documented coverups with the largest being the Rotherham Rape scandal. He then attempts (and fails) to shame anyone who doesn't agree with him. It is hard not laugh when he accuse others of taking stories blindly as this is pretty much the basis of his posts. Oh well, on to other subjects. .

See above. It is the "official" narrative

British Girls vs Migrants: The Real Story Remember, the Official Story is always, ALWAYS, wrong in at least one or more substantive details. So, it should come as no surprise that the British media is not only attempting to falsely spin the story of the young British girl who defended her sister from an alleged attack by a migrant sex pest, but appears to have gotten a number of basic details wrong as well. {snip} So, there are several obvious red flags in the Daily Mail’s version: He is a migrant from Bulgaria. No one said, or cares, how recently he arrived or whether he is “legal” or not. He is quite literally “a migrant”. The distinction between “illegal migrant” and “legal migrant” is arbitrary, irrelevant, and intended to obscure the issue. Presumably the police didn’t arrest him for the same reason they didn’t arrest any of the Rotherham rapists or the dozens of other migrant sex pests attacking young British girls. The police are evil and an important element of the war on the British people; the order they are employed to maintain is a wicked, anti-British, and anti-Christian order. She is carrying weapons at the age of 12 to defend herself and her sister from foreign sex assailants because she believes, correctly, that neither the police nor British men are going to defend her. The over-the-top victim rhetoric. “I am a human not an animal” is the sort of thing that third-worlders say because they behave like animals. A civilized individual never has any need to point it out. The “I could never” rhetoric. Never trust the word of anyone who attempts to substitute irrelevancies for actual impossibilities. “I was not there” is an alibi. “I have a baby” is not. He mentions “one more person” without clarifying that it was a third girl who is a friend of the two girls, an eyewitness to the attack, and was the individual who contacted the police. The article states that he was accompanied by his wife but not by their 8-month old baby. Was the woman with him actually his wife? You know it’s a Clown World propaganda piece in defense of the Narrative when they’re not accepting comments on the article. Now the real story from the mother of the THIRD girl who was there, who was an eyewitness to what she claimed was an attack by two migrants, and who called the police. https://archive.is/Rw8FC Never, ever, take anything the mainstream media says at face value. It’s always a spin and it’s always in the same direction. The fact that the story has already gone viral and spawned a series of effective means is why they’re attempting to get out ahead of it and spin their usual false narrative about how foreign invaders never did nothing to nobody and if you think they did, well, you’re just a racist. UPDATE: The BBC inadvertently demonstrates why British police reports cannot be trusted while trying to establish the Narrative. BBC News understands that officers have found no evidence to substantiate claims being made online the youths were at risk of sexual assault. The force had initially said she was 14, before issuing a correction. First, notice the focus on the claim of being “at risk of sexual assault” as opposed to the actual claim of “were physically assaulted by migrants”. Second, note that they didn’t get the age of the girl or the number of girls correct. And third, in the aftermath of Jimmy Savile and Rotherham, why would anyone take anything that the British police say seriously? They’re confirmed liars. UPDATE: Curiouser and curiouser. If this is the couple that attacked and filmed the girls, then the Bulgarian migrant being portrayed as the innocent victim by the Daily Mail wasn’t even involved at all and is probably just a crisis actor. It’s obviously not the same man; among other things, there is no cross tattoo on the neck. https://voxday.net/2025/08/28/british-girls-vs-migrants-the-real-story/

Hopeless. Meanwhile

Because she is a vile human being.

It is your thread.

Anything that you cannot understand usually is. (the problem is your biased view of both) .

That's fine because the post was obviously about Americans running guns to the British. As the Americans had to the Irish back in the 70's Try reading before you answer.

News,

Minneapolis Church Shooter ID'd, Disturbing Videos Suggest Potential Motive Matt Vespa https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/08/27/minneapolis-church-shooter-reportedly-identified-as-transgender-n2662424