Thurmal34

Please point to where I stated anything as a fact. WEO stated that no other GMs believed Nix's alleged "smokescreen" that Glenn was a guard. Sounds like he's certain of this. If so, I'm simply asking for proof of how he knows this information. Now, if he had said "he doubts" other GMs believed Nix's smokescreen, there would have been no need to ask for any factual data to back up his OPINION. See the difference?

Can you back up this opinion with any facts? A link perhaps?

This statement is false. Do you follow football at all? Gordy Glenn says hi.

Fixed Fitz's stat line for you. For some reason you accidentally included a team stat while posting his line. Let me know if you need any more assistance with the individual stats you post. Not too impressive a record for a starting LG. Clearly not worth re-signing at $8M per year with those stats.

The search function is your friend.

He's insisting on Ralph's Taurus but Ralph won't budge.

Ya think? http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/151366-mario-for-skelton/

The best bet is to sign Kolb and subsequently trade Mario for Skelton. Foolproof.

The Chicago Bulls say hi.

Sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the wall of silence from OBD regarding their moves/plans.

Dunno, but I love it.

Can you show me where I did that in any of my posts about the topic? Warner is a journeyman that had success later in his career. I'm not so sure why it so hard for folks to admit. See Jackson, Fred.

Sorry dude, but when you play in the Arena League, you are the definition of a journeyman. Silly Warner fanboys. You never shed the journeyman label if that's what you are. You're just a journeyman that became successful. Warner's career path, by any measure in any sport, is that of a journeyman.

But...but...Locker was the 8th pick in the draft! Surely taking a QB, any QB, is a foolproof way to improve!

Link?

Incorrect. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/16/not-so-fast-on-emmanuel-sanders-to-new-england/ Also of note from the article, Pats have no 4th, 5th, or 6th this year. If they do indeed give up a 3rd for Sanders, that would leave them with just 3 picks in this years draft.

Amendola misses an average of 5.5 games a year. Expecting (hoping?) that to change is risky. You may not agree, but you'd be wrong.

One thing that's not up for debate is that the decision to go with Amendola is far riskier than going with Welker.

Mediocre to poor players at best. What's your point? The bolded guys suck. You aren't under the impression that the Pats have been running the same offense since the days of David Givens, are you?

If you are going to post 40 times, please post factual info. http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=33707&draftyear=2008&genpos=WR

With the injury history or Hernandez, Gronkowski, and now Amendola, the odds are not in the Pats favor. History says some or perhaps all will miss significant time. Good luck with that.

What the?

I liked how Skip said it was "debatable" when Sherman told him he wasn't top 22 in his chosen field. Pssst, Skip, it isn't. You aren't.

Meh. Who cares. Nelson is average on his very, very, best day. For your sake I hope this is sarcasm.

By who, you? Jones, Nelson, Barnett, Merriman, and Wilson clearly were not considered "core" guys by OBD. All the evidence says otherwise. You listed two UDFAs, a castoff that signed late in FA, a mid-season waiver claim, and an old vet that was given a team friendly extension prior to '11. This is what you are using to grind your axe? If you want to complain about Fitz and Levitre, fine, go ahead. But for the sake of all that is holy, please don't try to spin it like OBD ever said they were going to build around David freaking Nelson. Get a grip man. By "large" you mean Kolb and Cassel money, right?