FleaMoulds80

Mel Kiper, is that you?

There's a reason why the SEC dominates college football. Not the OP but some people need to stop complaining about the SEC picks.

I don't think he fits the LT mold, but if our o-linemen starts droppin like flies, like they've done in the past, I guess it is nice to have someone like Glenn who can move around.

Glenn needs to lose about 15-20 lbs. Dont hate the pick. Don't love the pick. Would rather have had Massie

this is HYSTERICAL. LOL

I don't think it's funny at all. Personally I think it's retarded, juvenile, and just wrong. Apparently you still have a very juvenile mind.

She's hot but i've seen hotter

x2 I don't understand what you're basing this grade off of.

I just don't get people and Martin. Sorry but I just don't see it. I'd much rather have Massie than Martin. I just have a thing against "soft" lineman and to me, Martin seems soft.

First round grade based off what? These guys haven't even signed contracts or anything yet. Basing this off of potential and filling need? Consider these grades worthless

I don't think they will exactly but I can totally see Indy, Baltimore and Jacksonville considering OTs.

I think going into the 2nd round we'll probably have Fleener, Hill, Martin and Massie high on our board. I would like Hill, Fleener, Quick, or Massie as our next pick but would be very disappointed if we took Adams or Martin. Something about those 2 that I just don't like.

This team has weapons and I think Greg Little will turn into a VERY good WR in another 2 years. 700 yds and 2 TDs in his rookie year, in that offense? That's not bad. Not bad at all. They also have Cribbs, and to this day I have no idea why he doesn't have more yds and touches than he has. People can say "they don't have WR's" but that's not entirely true. Little IMO is a solid WR and Cribbs is a weapon they need to utilize more and with the addition of Richardson, they can now get another WR with their next pick.

It makes perfect sense. The Browns have a VERY good CB core and one of the best CBs in Haden so why would they waste their top 10 pick on Claiborne? That makes NO SENSE what so ever. If you have to take a pick between a stud WR and a stud RB, RB's obviously has better value and Richardson was obviously higher on their board. I believe RBs are a dime a dozen but if you could go back in time and we had a chance to draft Adrian Peterson, you wouldn't do it?

He won't be there for us. Rams, Colts, Browns and Panthers all need WR help and pick before us. Rams pick twice before us so I'm almost certain they'll take WR with at least one of those picks. If Hill falls to us, i'd be shocked if we don't take him.

I'll take Massie and stay far from Adams as humanly possible.

It was a smart decision by Cleveland. How can you possibly argue what they did and IMO they had a solid first round. Trent was probably their number 3 player on the board and were thinkin outside RG3 and Luck, he would be the player that would make the biggest impact, so why risk having someone cut in front of them? I don't fault them for doing that at all.

I've been the first one here saying Brian Quick and I'll stick with it.

http://tracking.si.com/2012/04/26/report-bills-interested-in-vikings-no-3-pick-eyeing-uscs-matt-kalil/

Bucs, St Louis, Jags and the Panthers could all use him. No way he drops

Whether he makes it or doesn't make the cut, that's VERY impressive. Would love to see how close you'd get.

Worst mock draft past after the top 5 picks... 1) No way Kuechly falls to 15. NO FREAKIN WAY. 2) No way Brockers falls to 25. NO FREAKIN WAY. 3) What does Shea McClellin have anything to do with the Ravens losing Johnson? Johnson is a DE in a 34 and Shea is a projected OLB in a 34. 4) Dont'a Hightower doesn't even make the first round in your mock? 5) Fletcher Cox at 20? C'mon man!!! 6) Carolina at 9 needs DT help more than anything. Also, they need another WR weapon outside Smith, so I'd put Cox or Floyd there instead of Coples. Carolina is a real darkhorse to pick up Floyd at 9 to help Cam. 7) Bengals already have Pacman Jones to deal with. They're not going to add fuel to the fire by adding Jenkins. That's just pure stupidity on anyones part. They need RB help and offensive line help. 8) Giants just signed Martellus Bennett in free agency and didnt resign Kareem McKenzie. They're also looking to trade Osi so I'd look for them to sign another OLB or DE or even a DT. But definitely not a TE. Giants have proven they can make any TE look good in their offense. Look at Kevin Boss and Ballard. 9) Bears traded 2 3rd rounders for Marshall. They have so many needs right now at OL, CB, DT, and DE opposite Peppers. You honestly think they'll take a WR with one of their first 2 picks considering they don't pick again til round 4? That would be the dumbest thing they can do considering how much they dropped for Marshall already. 10) Lastly Patriots need CB help more than anything else. I don't see them wanting to use Edelman at CB much longer. If anything, I see the Patriots taking a risk on Jenkins since they have the stability in the locker room and enough veteran to keep him in check.

And Kyle Boller threw the ball about 50 yds from his knees. I don't see where this has to do with anything. I'm not impressed with Mallett and never have been impressed with him. Plus how often do you see trades happen within the same division?

He showed nothing in this interview. All he showed me was he is full of cheezy lines and is all talk.

Kuechly's 6 INTs the last 2 years compared to David's 2 INTs tells everyone he's a better cover LB