Jump to content

FleaMoulds80

Community Member
  • Posts

    693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FleaMoulds80

  1. Are you serious with this? Cowboy and Viking are not derogatory names. Why don't we make an NFL team called the Chinatown Yellowskins. Maybe we can call another team the Saratoga Whities or the Harlem Blackskins. I hate racism and prejudice and there's no room for it anywhere. There are other ways to name Indians other than "Redskins." I love to stir the pot on these forums but comments like this is ridiculous. I don't mind the Cleveland Indians, Florida State Seminoles, or the Chicago Blackhawks. But Redskins? Really? There are other ways around this than calling them by that.
  2. Ben Patrick? Give me a break. David Terrell? An NFL bust. Just because they make it to the next level doesn't mean they're weapons. Could be because these guys were a product of the QBs making them look good because the QB themselves were just good, which further proves my point.
  3. I still don't see the relationship. Ben Roethlisberger, Joe Flacco, Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Andrew Luck are just some names that I can think of off the top of my head that probably had no weapons at all in college. Meanwhile, wasn't Pennington throwing the ball to Randy Moss, but his numbers didn't skyrocket. So regardless of who the QB was throwing the ball to, competent scouts should be able to see talent regardless. This IMO is a bogus statement and makes no sense. If you were talking about WR, it would make more sense. Not QBs
  4. Everything you just said means absolutely nothing when evaluating QBs in college. Who did Matt Ryan have when he was at Boston College? What about Joe Flacco? Tom Brady had some nice weapons but wasn't the most talented and didn't have the best numbers. Who was Andrew Luck throwing the ball to at Stanford? When you're evaluating QBs you look at the QB himself and gametape. What he does under pressure. His mechanics, athletic abilities, etc. Regardless of who his targets are.
  5. Dont think you can ever consider a 3rd round pick to be a "bust." I don't see an immediate contribution from him but definitely someone we can plug in every once in awhile for added depth.
  6. This defense better be ready to stop the run because I see the Patriots as becoming a more balanced offense. Ridley and Blount combination could be deadly. This defense better step it up in their rush defense this year or we're gonna be picking in the top 10 again next year.
  7. x2. This is the thing I am most pleased with about this draft. Glad we're finally drafting players with an edge to them instead of these nice guys.
  8. After meeting him in person and talking to him and his wife, Stevie is a stand up guy and VERY mature. People give him a bad rap for being immature on the field. The dude loves his job and wants to have fun. Off the field he's very well spoken, intelligent and an overall great guy. He doesn't even think of himself as a celebrity or anything. When I met him he kept saying "I'm a normal guy just like you." If Rogers sticks with Stevie and listens, he'll be fine
  9. There's track speed and football speed. As long as you got football speed, that's fine with me.
  10. A WR that understands how to run routes will outlast a WR that can just run fast. This is why i love WRs like Reggie Wayne, Stevie Johnson, Jerry Rice. 40 is overrated. Great pick up
  11. Yup. Redshirt Lattimore this year and release Freddy next year and we'll have our Thunder and Lightening for the future. Would LOVE Lattimore in the 4th. Great value IMO.
  12. It is. Shows pretty much nothing except how their high tech gadgets are used. Doesn't show his ability to read a defense or throw when 340 lb linemen are breathing down his neck. Not impressed. Such a gimmick segment
  13. Alex Okafor, Marcus Lattimore, Stepfan Taylor, Barrett Jones, David Bakhtiari, Jordan Poyer are some names I'm hoping to hear the Bills call today.
  14. Stevie can play anywhere. Slot, SE, anywhere. Stevie is by far the most underrated WR in the NFL and it's not even close.
  15. No one. I would've stayed away from every QB in this draft and just gone with Kolb. Would've drafted a QB in next year's draft. Buddy feels the heat so I guess we HAD to pick one this year.
  16. We could've traded back a bit further probably and taken him at the end of the 1st round and gathered up more picks. This was a boneheaded pick if you ask me. This guy's not even ready to start day 1 and had other needs that could've contributed in his first year. 49ers were right there willing to trade up for Eric Reid and could've been an ideal trade partner. Drafting Manuel near the end of the 1st round wouldn't have been as bad. That was a panic move if I ever saw one. Don't think any team would've traded back into the 1st for EJ Manuel. Just didn't see it happening.
  17. TE is the last thing we need. CB, DE/edge passrusher and O-line are much bigger needs. Still need a legitimate QB too but I think we can address that next year hopefully
  18. An agitator on the field that likes to stir the pot and play to the whistle. Translation. He's a punk on the field. Love it! Tired of these clean players that play too nice. Love the woods pick too. Manuel was still a waste.
  19. EJ Manuel better sit his rookie year or we'll ruin another QB.
  20. Shoulda traded back again if we were gonna take this guy. Just don't understand this team and their thinking process on drafting QBs. Completely inept. This guy better live in the film room his rookie year and eat, breathe, and sh** football. He's a 2-3 year project and is far from being ready to take over the reigns. Get ready to draft another QB in 4 years.
×
×
  • Create New...