dayman

Some truth in that. But many people care about when and how as much if not more.

There is little reasoning, IMO, going into any opinion that uses this trial as a way to wage war on media bias.

It isn't Woodward or Obama's fault you sent emails around the office talking openly about your Department violating it's own regulations. Pick up phone once in a while you anti-social faceless bureaucrat. Don't be so bitter.

I can imagine it not going to trial. And I can imagine stand your ground in the Fla Supreme Court.

Lets just agree it was close enough for government work and call it day. You of all people should agree

Are you saying that in a friendly advice way or in a threatening way?

lmfao "die thread"...isn't the hearing tomorrow? Or has it already happened? And if ends there this thread and America will go nuts...and if it goes to a jury this thread and America will go nuts...

Pretty clear btw...that Woodward led people to believe in that interview it was something it wasn't. Once I read the emails...this is a fairly meaningless story...

Hey now, in defense of the WH...nobody has to tell Rahm to do stuff like that...

I put it at 35% he gets convicted.

I'm not sure what his opinion was...even though he said that's his opinion many times...

Obama will take blame if it carries on for a long time and the effects end up being obvious. And that truth is conventional wisdom. I don't know where you get the impression he can sail through this if bad things start happening. GOP will also take heavy heat. Obviously the House has an election in 2 years, Obama will never have one again...that's the real advantage from a political perspective. Dems basically put it all on a Obama...he eats the sin from his 2nd term immunity...GOP have to fight to stay.

Agree with Tasker. Got to look at the old balance sheet. But in general if you can say **** you to anybody you work with or for and just walk away from whatever you are doing b/c you don't need the money...then you are rich...although even if you don't have **** you money you may be rich based on the old balance sheet

Tom Hanks had a hand in this somehow..

If you are doing a clean install and can get windows 8 as easily/same money as 7 then get 8. It's a no brainer. You lose nothing once you get past a couple slightly different things and you gain some optional stuff that stays out of the way unless you want it. Go 8. Unless you have to buy a new license. If that's the case, it isn't worth it.

I can feel your anger, it give you focus, it makes you stronger...

the topic itself is boring and tired...but the source war within it worth a read for chuckles...you bit either way...and started talking about googling for more poorly sourced stories to prove the legitimacy of one...that said...given how uninteresting the topic itself is I haven't looked for legit source material...but none has been posted..thus everybody may be a looser in this bout...as PPP should be

lol you got zinged in that other topic well enough for some posts you made but that said...still waiting on a link to the solicitation and quote from it... then you are an idiot for not seeing both at once before your eyes

the realist knows that the ACA is not going to destroy everything and everyonewhen it kicks in, but isn't going to work real well either...and there will be two choices continue to fix it as everything shifts to provide more healthcare and medicare payments structures lead the charge to slow the growth in costs that previous medicare pay structures helped spur...or you can move to single payer...but once the reforms regarding access to insurance and thus care for those in need is gone...that will never be removed...and thus...both parties have to focus on improving a system where everybody who buys in is covered as opposed to just saying it can't be done and saying no....

What nobody has talked about is while the cuts hurt some of things the Dems like, they kick in more gradually there than they do in defense..and while the Dems don't want to slash defense the way this will they want to cut it but the Repubs want next to nothing...and in the end defense will be more cliff like while most states unemployment and welfare will be months away from significant check cuts

Yes you idiot, learn to see sarcasm when it confronts you and not have to ask.

Well in the governments defense they're going to compel a huge portion young/healthy people into the market at higher premiums than they would have had previous to the law dumping a bunch of money in.....so it's really a question of how far off the projections of those enrollments are...

go go go

That's the main point they are hounding you for. There is only one true reality so even if there are a thousand others...it doesn't matter

Someone post the truth, and we will see who is right. I have to go to work. I will check back at lunch. Homework assigned. Don't disappoint.