Rob's House

Interesting choice. It seems to me you and your ilk are the ones casting stones, now you're claiming victim status for being called out. Since you brought it up, let's compare the two. You people tarred, feathered, doxxed, and called for vigilante violence against kids you thought mocked a guy. Donald Trump called for the justice system to reinstate the death penalty for kids who confessed to and were convicted of a brural rape & attempted murder. The facts that came out proved the Covington boys were actually the ones being harassed, and were at worst obnoxious, you people doubled down and insisted on their destruction. In the other case, it turned out that the boys were coerced into false confessions and while not guilty of the rape were guilty of beating and mugging random people in the park that night. They were then paid a $41 mil settlement and held up as innocent victims. So you people continue to seek the systematic destruction of kids for acting obnoxious, but hold up the Central Park 5 as heroes for only beating and mugging innocent people for fun. To be clear, I don't agree with President Trump's approach to the case, but let's not pretend there is some kind of equivalence here.

Isn't this what you guys call "whataboutism"?

That's kind of the point. It's just teenage boys acting like teenage boys, and it's being treated like a grievous affront to humanity. Every piece of ***** out there tweeting their righteous indignation acted just as inappropriately if not moreso at one time or another at that age. And the ones who didn't were the most boring losers in school.

Say what you will about AOC, but at least she's talking about issues. Don't get me wrong, this "green new deal" is ***** retarded and would crush the economy to the point Mexico would be building the wall to keep us out, but it's marginally preferable to jumping from rooftop to rooftop crying racism.

Because they're leftists they can be written off as fringe nuts. If they were white racists it would be dispositive proof of the scourge of white supremacy.

You realize that makes you no different from the left.

If you don't see the broader implications here I don't know what to tell you. This story should not be allowed to die quietly.

Hard to refute that.

Put down the soy latte and wipe your pu$$y. The Indian dude & his buddies weren't trying to defuse anything. They were instigators who walked up in that crowd looking for trouble. I realize if you were in that situation you'd get down on your knees and start bouncing his balls off your chin, but the response of those kids was remarkably tame compared to how the average group of guys would have responded. You and the rest of the left-wing scum who feel heroic about trying to destroy these kids for wearing MAGA hats should burn in hell.

YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!!

If an old white man walked up on a group of black kids, invaded the personal space of one, and began banging a drum in his face, how do you think that would go over? If the black kid stood and smiled at him would there be outrage? If he punched him in the face would there be outrage then? Or would they say the white man had it coming?

As much as I like cheering for whoever's playing the Pats I'd rather see them win seeing as how the Rams didn't even win their game.

They've gotten a couple on the Bills that way over the years too. I just don't think that was the difference tonight.

It didn't touch him at all. They showed it from all angles. It never touched him. Even if it had it wouldn't have mattered b/c the next play was an INT, but it didn't.

I don't get the whining about the refs in this game. They gave Brady a bogus roughing the passer, but the Chiefs had a call or two that went their way too. I'm just not seeing it. The Saints, on the other hand, got ***** in the ass. They won that game & the refs took it away. If the Rams win the SB the Saints should get honorary rings.

I don't get what the story is. I see an old Indian banging a drum and a bunch of kids who think it's funny. Where's the story?

I assumed you were intelligent enough to distinguish between "on-field" and "off-field" but perhaps I gave you too much credit.

I don't get it.

He's not trying to make a point, he's just virtue-signaling.

Bruce Smith. Don't even have to think about it.

The consequence of this speech is that I (and I'm sure others) have formed the opinion that you hold self-righteous beliefs that were spoon-fed to you by tv/media that you think are your core beliefs. The idea that using the word retarded to refer to stupid people is derogatory to the mentally ill iisn't enlightened or empathetic...it's retarded. The only difference between "retard" and "moron" is one was arbitrarily deemed offensive by the PC crowd in search of a new source of outrage. So if you hold this belief and still use the term moron or idiot, you're retarded.

The reference comes from Nassim Talib's book of the same name. He should buy a few copies & leave them lying around the office as a subtle way of telling those people they're idiots.

I applaud your company for employing the mentally handicapped.