Rob's House

Do you see him as merely preferable to Hillary or do you really like him?

Do you prefer him over the rest of the field by a wide margin?

I've noticed some stark differences between Bernie's supporters and the establishment Democrat crowd. I'm curious who here prefers Bernie to Hillary et. al.

I read the last page and didn't see it. I think you're seeing what you want to see rather than what's there.

Can you cite one such post?

And if the confederate flag controversy ended with it coming down from above the state house you might have a point. But instead that was just the beginning of a wholesale assault on everything Southern. And bigoted disparagement were publicly proclaimed against anyone privately displaying the flag, there was a fascist movement to pressure marketplaces to ban its sale between independent and private parties, followed by a concerted effort to stomp every aspect of traditional Southern culture out of existence. I'm not seeing any concern about Muslim culture from the same Gugnys that decided the confederacy was Nazi Germany after one guy shot up a church.

I think that's What they call "addition by subtraction."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3166640/Violent-clashes-expected-South-Carolina-Ku-Klux-Klan-New-Black-Panther-Party-come-face-face-rival-rallies-outside-capitol-statehouse.html Not to defend white supremacists, who marginalize any legitimate group they purport to align with, and play right into the hands of the media and the left to reinforce their distorted view of the racist South, but the double standard here is brazen. The KKK are demonstrating for white supremacy while the Black Panthers are merely demonstrating for "racial equality."

Let's read the full bit: http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/07/18/trump-mccain-a-war-hero-because-he-was-captured-i-like-people-who-werent/

That's what my [government made] money was on.

And maybe someday you'll explain why the entity that "makes the money" needs to take some of it "back" as opposed to simply making more.

This would explain Orton's unexpected retirement announcement at the end of the year too. I always figured he came back for a chance to be a starter. If what you suggest is accurate, maybe he decided that he has enough money, didn't like the idea of another season playing Marrone brand football, and decided to call it a career.

Still wondering

can always count on you to be a simple and narrow minded, bigoted douche bag.

Do we know if the wife and the mistress resided within the same area code?

Rob Johnson and I share a name.

Doesn't he?

What a narrow minded tool. Thanks for pricing my point that it's a southern thing that Yankees and left coasters don't get. I wonder if this ©unt, or the ©unt that linked it, wonder how anyone can respect the American flag that represents a country that enslaved people and started wars (including the civil war, but I'll let you live in your delusional world), massacred Indians, and interned Japanese. The red on "Old Glory" is for the blood on America's hands. But go pledge your allegiance, then go fu©k yourself.

Still wondering.

I'm just wondering why, if the government makes money, it needs to take some of it back. Why not just make more?

This is profound.

No, it doesn't. The government prints currency. To deny the distinction is to admit to a lack of even a basic understanding of the subject.

Don't you have to own something in the first place before you can take it back?

Because the scheme won't change from year to year, just the coach. It prevents the disruption this year and by next year they have the luxury of time to transition smoothly. And by this time next year this could be a dead issue in which case there's no need to transition at all.

An easy solution: Bills say they'll wait to let the legal proceedings play out before they make a move. Kromer's lawyer continues it out until the end of the season. Then if the Bills want to move on they can do it at the start of the off-season rather than scrambling to find an OL coach going into camp.