xsoldier54

If you're dumb enough to believe this guy is for real, then feel free to play along my friend.

Anyone who takes this as a serious post is a fool. This guy is yanking your chain. I only responded because I can't believe anyone would fall for this obvious hoax, just like they did last time. Do yourselves a favor and ignore this guy. It's a waste of time.

Well I think your post is totally incestious. Not only that but your sister is your mother(incestuous).

I could not agree more. When trades are being discussed, it is up to the team that wants the player to make an offer. If the Saints wanted to offer a third, they would have and Buffalo would have taken it. Glazer is full of crap. And that's why Curt Menafee is still Curt Menafee.

Fitz has yet to show that he can beat a good team. Every time they played a good team, he found ways to lose the game. Kelly on the other hand was at his best under pressure. He consistently beat Marino and Elway in head to head matchups. Numbers don't tell the whole story. They are just statistics. What counts is the ability to win football games. Kelly had it, Fitz does not. He is a step up over Trent Edwards, but that ain't saying much.

Patting yourself on the back much? While it's true that Brohm looked horrible, you can't possibly blame that performance entirely on him. Gailey made absolutely no adjustment to counter the constant blitzing. Ever hear of a draw play or screen pass. I agree with you that Brohm was horrible, but certainly two starts and a few pre-season games are not enough of a sample size to write him off. Will he ever be a good NFL QB? Who knows? Not me, that's for sure, not based on two games that meant nothing. I don't know for sure if he can be any good, but I know for sure that I have seen enough of Fitzpatrick to know that he is not the answer either. He turns the ball over way too much to ever lead a team to a Super Bowl, or even the playoffs in my opinion. Mistakes can be overcome against bad teams and those are the only teams Fitz has been able to beat. Against good teams, those same mistakes will lead to blowouts, just like they did against New England. Bottom line, Brohm is too inexperienced and Fitz just isn't good enough. This team desperately needs a QB among other things. Building a DL and linebacking corps wouldn't be a bad idea either.

Don't like picking a WR in the third round. We are very deep at WR and there should be someone better at a needed position like LB or DL available in the third round.

The Sky is Falling! The Sky is Falling! Woe is us!

Regardless of his race, taking a QB in the first round is a crap shoot. It has been proven repeatedly. If he were to fall to later in the draft, then maybe he's worth a shot. #3 pick? Too much of a gamble.

That one made me laugh, but who the hell is Molly Ringrose?

Actually they finished 6-10 last year. The fact is that the QB turned the ball over four times yesterday against a very good team. That is the reason for the result of this game. Fitz has been entertaining to watch this year and he has the ability to put some points on the board, but his penchant for turnovers bit him in the rear end yesterday. You just can't turn the ball over against good teams and expect to win. Period. He is a step up over Trent Edwards, but ultimately not the answer. I do not have "lowered expectations". I fully realize this team has a lot of holes, but I do believe that if they find a decent QB that does not turn the ball over and get get a couple decent defensive players in the draft, then they can contend. Cheers.

I was thinking the same thing. I called my son at half time to tell him what I had just seen as he wasn't getting the game. I was dumbfounded. I just don't see how it was possible to have the timeout called with the clock ticking down to zero and a pileup at the goal line. I have never witnessed anything like that before. Awful strange that noone on any of the highlight shows said anything about it either.

Really? Did you watch the first half of the game yesterday? Have you forgotten how bad this team is capable of playing? Great second half yesterday, but against better teams, there is no way they win that game. Looking at the schedule I see two possible wins in Cleveland and Miami. I don't believe the Bills will win any of the others. They are playing better since the bye week, but this team is still capable of stinking up the joint. It's too bad that they lost some of those close games against B'more, KC and Chicago, or it might have been a different season. I would love to see the results that you predict, I just don't believe this team can pull it off.

Do you really think he'll call himself Ochocinco after his football days? He's still Chad Jackson. He only changed his name because the NFL wouldn't let him put Ochocinco on the back of his jersey. I agree with the poster, he's Chad Jackson.

All they have to do to improve the current ones are wear them the way they were designed. When they introduced the current uni's they had the blue pants with the white shirts for away games and the white pants with the blue jerseys at home. Just doing that would be way better than the way they look now. The pants and shirts are mismatched on both uni's because they weren't designed to be worn that way.

+1 Nailed it.

I said I thought it was funny. Just a bit ironic, don't you think? C'mon man lighten up. You're missing the point. I posted the quote because I thought it was funny. I'm sure Jackson didn't even make the connection. Just thought it was worth a chuckle.

Discussing the pre-game altercation between the Redskins and Eagles, Jackson had this to say "The pregame altercation got us going. It had us ready. We came back into the locker room pumped," Jackson said. "We were like pit bulls, ready to get out of the cage." I couldn't help but laugh when I read this. Maybe he should have chosen a different analogy given the history of the guy who was throwing him the ball.

Okay, maybe "let him walk" was the wrong phrase to use. What I mean is that I don't believe he is the answer in the long term and I would prefer to see someone else play if they do indeed draft a QB. I agree he is very smart and very tough, just not physically able to cash the checks his mind is writing.

I prefer to be called "mentally challenged".

Look, I like the guy. When I say critical, I mean when there's a chance to put the game away. I have watched him miss throws in each of the last four weeks that could have given the Bills a victory or put the game out of reach. It seems to be a pattern. I think he is very smart and very tough, just not physically capable of doing what he wants to do when it counts the most. It's just my opinion from watching him over the past two years. Is he better than what we had before him? Absolutely. Is he good enough to lead this team to a playoff berth? Not in my opinion. That's all I'm saying.

I'd have to answer yes to about half the guys on your list. I like Fitz and he has made this team competitive. I just don't believe he has the physicl tools to ever be a playoff calibre quarterback. Hats off to him for playing his heart out, but once again yesterday, he made some really bad throws, just as he has done the past 6 weeks and just as he will continue to do. Nothing personal against him, I think he really gives it everything he's got. I just don't think he will ever have the physical skills needed to consistently win in the NFL.

I could care less where Fitzpatrick was drafted. My opinion of him is based solely on what I have seen him do in games. I think that he is very gritty and full of heart. Statistics don't mean squat to me. It is obvious that he cannot consistently throw the ball accurately and he tends to make bad mistakes at critical times. That is what I am looking at. I like him as a leader of men, I just don't think he has the physical skills to execute what he wants to do. That, in the end, is what is his undoing. He will never be good enough to lead a team to the playoffs, which is what I am looking for.

So because I disagree with you that makes me "dumb"? I have watched Rian Lindell his entire career. I agreed that he has been mostly solid. I also have seen him miss his share of kicks that would have either put games away when the Bills had the lead or put them ahead. I stand by my original statement. If you disagree that's fine, I won't stoop to your level and call you dumb. And I don't think holding a kicker accountable for missing easy kicks is going to run anybody out of town.