Malazan

I think you're overstating your case.

If he plays, I think he stays where he's at...don't see it working out with the Bills. Not every player who is a free agent, release, on the trade block needs to come to the Bills.

reality? On TBD? What?

Is there an actual source for this? This feels more like, "Man, I wish we had Freeman." then talking yourself into the idea that the Bucs would trade him.

It's something I noted as the season began. Last season we heard about how much Fitz and Stevie worked during the offseason. We didn't hear about that this last offseason.

I just want to take a moment and point out that 'Franchise' QB is getting thrown around a lot. One good year does not make a franchise QB.

Yes, fans are not rational

This thing that hasn't happened yet is because of this other thing! I WANT TO YELL! AHHHHH!

In dream world, I'd prefer Nassib in the 2nd round over the 1st if that is who they go with, but I don't think that is realistic. Hopefully, Marrone and Pettine bring a culture change with them.

The ole fan fallacy. They also only want the guys they hear about on ESPN. They seem to forget that an NFL organization is responsible for thousands of players and many you never hear about.

I already posted it in this very thread.

You're arguing for a reasoned response and analysis to people who just want to yell.

Keep in mind, Aaron can control his weight now and become the hulk or the flash depending on team needs.

1. I don't think people in general beyond a few loose screws are saying it's a weak year. Most are referring to the QB situation. Seems like a strawman, but you did indeed, knock it down. 2. Also, not something I see people in general saying. I see a lot of people who do think that you can simply make a trade down whenever you want to do so and generally get the price you want. 3. Picks in the top ten generally have a lot of talent left and falls back on the previous argument. It adds the element of saying GMs believe it is a weak year which doesn't seem to be the case. A lot of this also comes from pre-rookie scale days where a team could end up giving a high pick a crazy amount of money and have him bust.

He can spend his money as he pleases.

Yep, and the TBD perception that "I want to trade down to this spot and get this in return for it" makes that deal possible still exists!

That's not the point. I'm not sure how you got that. There's a perception that the Bills somehow spent vastly more under Nix than previous regimes. I'm saying there's a possibility that what exists in your head is different than reality.

Ok, here's what the Bills should do and Buddy is a fool if he doesn't do it. They should trade down to the 1st pick in the draft. I get you're probably confused by that. See, they just tell KC that they are trading down because 1 is a lower number than 8. They won't know, they did worse than the Bills. So then you take that number 1 pick and trade for a time machine to last year and trade all your picks from last year for the 1st spot and all your picks from this year for the 2nd spot and draft Andrew Luck and RG3. Then you run the two QB system and Superbowl.

Those are letters and punctuation. Not numbers.

It amazes me that with *NO* indication of what the Bills are going to do that people feel they need to get 'the message'. I like how the Bills get held accountable for things they may do in the future. It is better to watch than Minority Report.

Most people aren't familiar with the law in regards to copyright and trademark. It is also much scarier when you get sued by an avalanche like the NFL than it is talking about someone getting sued. If you think the NFL is bad, look at the Olympics (I'm probably going to get a legal nastygram on just using that word).

Nowadays, you need QBs who can throw a ball (note: being able to take a snap is implied).

Back that up with numbers, please.

I think there should be competition at QB. I hope they get competition at #1 WR too.

Damn internet, keeping these old decisions around and making the new ones suspect.