Billsrhody

Yea it look like they're offering a "max" package for $299 and a standard package for $199 right now.. that might be our best option. Thanks for your help everyone

Here's my situation... My father is in Rhode Island and I am in New York and both of us want to be able to watch bills games live. We were looking into the online sunday ticket package. Does anyone know if two people can watch games at once with this package? If not.. does anyone have another suggestion (besides streaming)? Thanks for the help!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kaWL1VkGrc This might be the worst throw I've ever seen..

Montana is tough to argue against.. I would also throw out names like Marino, Favre and Elway.

So basically you dont believe that people can change.. got it.

The average person doesn't make millions of dollars because they are not great at anything. Vick is great at playing football, thats why he can go back to doing what he did before. If you had a great stock broker who had the same thing happen to him.. I bet he we go right back to being a stock broker after because he's great at what he does. If anything.. Vick's "celebrity" made it harder for him to return.. you dont see PETA running after the "average person". You're basically just hating on him because he's talented.

I'm not saying it was socially acceptable I'm just saying that he grew up doing it and probably never questioned it. Are you trying to say that it is as bad as rape and murder? Don't forget that you're the one who brought that into the argument.. Either way you're ignoring the fact that he has changed and showed remorse for what he has done. He learned to view dogs as more than just animals and he realized that some people care about dogs (unlike the culture where he grew up). I'm not saying what he did was right, it was downright awful. But what does a guy have to do? He can't change the past..

I just happen to believe that he grew up in a culture where dog fighting was common place. I don't think he really even questioned it as being immoral until he went to jail for it. Since that point he's been educated and he's changed his ways and even lobbied against dog fighting http://nation.foxnews.com/michael-vick/2011/07/20/michael-vick-animal-rights-activist-seeks-redemption . I really don't think child molesters, murderers and rapists belong in this conversation. They all go to jail for life or close to it. Lets not pretend that what Mike Vick did is anywhere close to being a rapist or a murderer.

So you don't believe in giving the guy a second chance?

Awesome story.. he's got my vote!

Haha just in case we have a run on mustache related stories.. I'd like to say I was the first

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000052704/article/presenting-the-best-mustaches-in-nfl-history?module=HP11_content_stream Just read this little countdown on nfl.com. My question is.. How is Andy Reid not on that list?? Can you think of anyone else who they missed?

Dont get me wrong.. VY has a lot to prove. It just bugs me when people knock him for not knowing the playbook when any other QB put in his situation would have a similar learning curve. With that said, if you're hesitant because of his tendency to be a headcase then you are certainly justified in waiting for him to prove it.

You didnt call him an idiot.. you just said that he couldnt use his brain. Is there really a difference? Yes he's had his issues in the past but lets give him a chance at a fresh start. Also I dont want you to feel like I was calling you out in particular, I feel like a lot of posters knock Vince for his smarts.

Some people like to play!

I dont understand why everyone is crapping on VY right now. The guy is starting fresh with a new playbook. Can you give him the whole off-season to get adjusted before you start calling him an idiot?

Levitre. Byrd is a nice player but we do have a replacement (Searcy) behind him if he does end up leaving. Levitre's skill and versatility make him one of the most important pieces on our offensive line. If anything is important on the O-line.. its continuity so I wouldn't give him up over a safety.

Brady is going to play until he is 40.. why would you give up 5 years of certain superbowl contention for potential superbowl contention?

http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-12-27/jon-gruden-reportedly-plans-on-coaching-next-season Well if things don't work out this year.. we can always make a run at Gruden.

whaaaat??

If he screws up he deserves criticism.. and he did screw up on that Jenkins play, no one can deny that. He didnt have his head around and started looking for the ball too late. With that said he has done a lot of things well and was even in good position on that play. I'm sure the coaches criticized him and I'm sure he'll learn from it

One team that would most certainly not is the Patriots. They would be giving up Brady, Gronkowski and (Wilfork, Mayo, Welker). They would be downgrading at QB and giving up two elite players.

Too many negative plays

I had him on my fantasy team last year and he was 8th best fantasy WR in my league. I know at the beginning of the year he was complaining about the number of snaps he was getting.. but after week 3 or 4 that was a non issue and it had nothing to do with his health.

2009 - 15 games played 2010 - 14 games played 2011 - 16 games played might wanna check your facts...