mikey98277

While I think it would be a great x mas if it happened, but unless our defense figured out how to cover both of NE tight-ends we are going to be SOL!

Yes I would say this logic is a little off, we can pass and win without lee, just cannot run? I am not the brightest person alive but that is retarded logic. You can win by passing without the so called #1, but he is the reason they cannot run. If you believe that then you are mentally challenged.

he has a place, its on IR, where his lack of effort and giving up plays belong

One thing I wanted to bring up was I am reading here allot of people saying that Fitz is a stop gap, which maybe true, it is hard to say, this is uncharted teritory for him at the moment. One thing I was thinking about is about a decade ago I remember thinking this brady guy was an ok QB that could manage the game given the right circumstances. Not saying that is Fitz, but with this really being his first taste of winning as a QB in this league nobody can tell the future. What I do know is that he has earned the right to keep his job, if a better option comes along then so be it, but he is NOT the problem on this team, if anything he is the one elevating the team at the moment not the other way around.

I am confused, according to many on this board we cannot pass without evans distracting people and going deep....and not catching it

Only if Nix/Gailey care about the 4-5 million, other than that if they can make up his production without the quit on plays that result in interceptions there is no reason to keep him, he can be good, maybe even very good, just not on this team.

Have you watched the Pats play this year at all to make a statement that they are overrated, they have the best record in the NFL, and not a cake schedule, so I dont know if you just are saying what you hope cuz that all I can guess as they have been embarrassing teams with winning records as of late.

I never said it was Lee's fault, I even said with a type of QB that can do it, Lee would be a viable threat, My point is we dont have the other half of the threat for lee to work with. I do not dislike him or wish him ill will, it would probably be better for him to go somewhere that has a QB that can bomb it to him a few times a game. We just dont have that threat. I seen someone compare Evans to Moss, that is just dumb, and that all I am going to say about that, Moss is future HOF, Evans not even pro bowl. Lee has had what 3 different coaches and has not been a wes welker type, do you think that 3 coaches didnt see it, or is it more likely that Evans is not suited for that role? I would say I hardly ever see him run a slant, and when he does, if he is going to get hit he dosnt catch the ball he ducks and covers, maybe that is why he is not the wes welker type ya think?

It gets very old off all these people claiming we cant make up for Evans production, over the last 2 years, he has been outplayed by at least one other reciver on his own team. Not to mention all the other posters who have brought up that he is a one trick pony, and we dont have a QB that can do that, so tell me again why we keep him? Not that he couldnt do better with that type of QB, but We dont have what he needs to make his trick work. Everyone will see over the next 3 weeks, nobody was afraid of evans going deep cuz our QB cant throw it there, so why worry about someone running out of the QB range, answer is teams dont. When we face our division and are able to pass the ball at least as well as we were with Evans in there they will have nothing left to say other than it could have been better.

your right i cannot believe how often I hear on this board that we need and Irish-Catholic QB around here, oh wait this is the first, I normally dont say much about a persons opinion, but this has to be one of the dumbest bigot post I have seen in awhile.

Well it looks as if he is gone for the year, maybe back for the last game, the games coming up are the divisional games, and lets see who lines up in the number 1 spot has more than 1-3 catches for 20 yards, it should be Stevie, so if he has more production than Evans there will be no more speculation if Evans is worth the money, I am going to go out on a limb as say the Johnson will have more than 1-3 catches for 20 yards, and he will be treated as the number one, so that will shut up all the evans love on the board. (Well probably still wont, they will still give out REASONS why its not his fault)

I hate the Patriots more than any other team, but for those of you who think we are gonna win are nuts, Have you watched them play since they hit their stride, they are destroying teams now, not beating them, destroying them, I hope it is some what competitive, but if you think that the patriots will rest because they have home field advantage obviously have not watch Bill Coach for the last decade, he never pulls up.....ever!!

Yes during the game I mentioned to my wife after more than a few of his comments that he must be mentally challenged. I know we are bad so we get the worst, and when we play another bad team that just makes it even worse. So we got the bottom of the pile for play by play, but on a side note, steve tasker seems to be calling allot more of the bigger games, so good for him.

Not to some one here, they wonder why the bills dont win that often, and they want to keep the #1 guy that is a 4 million dollar decoy, not have someone draw double coverage and actually make more than 1-3 catches a game, Just wait he may very well break 40 catches this year !!! What more could you ask for from your #1 than decoy and 40 whole catches at 4 million a year, that is a great bargain. at a simple million dollars per touchdown !!

While that is probably true, I wish I only had 500,000 left in the bank!!

While I do agree in part with your statement, but as far as the PI being BS then your just blind, he held the guys arm and didnt let him extend, that my friend is the definition of PI

While no matter if the refs were totally in the bills favor they still would have not won the game, the refs were all one sided today and if you didnt see that then watch the game and see it for what it was

Turned off the game before it was over for the first time this season, that is saying allot for a 2-9 team !!

What game you watching? let me know so I can turn it on

For everything the defense does, the offense offsets it right away. They say that for every action there is a opposite and equal reaction, but I dont that that is suppose to mean this crap.

Its hard to play against a defense that has 20 players on it, the bills need some of the refs to come on there side every once and awhile

If you listen to Gailey talk, he states all the time that he is always looking for players to better the team, if someone is only maybe going to play 1 more game, then he wants to bring in anyone he can to see them play to see if they are worth a shot next year, there is no playoffs so no reason to worry about hurry up and play those you already know about coming off an injury.

Most of the other teams #1's can still make more than 1 catch for 9 yards with a fumble and they all get doubled also, so that is no excuse for someone who makes the money he does!

I dont get all the Evans love, in the last 2-3 years I cannot remember off the top of my head, but i know of atleast 5 times he did not fight for the ball and it was intercepted, Allot more were almost intercepted from his lack off effort going for the ball, if it were not for the money I would say cut him, for those who say he is a leader, what makes you think that? are you in the huddle, the only other way you could tell is leading by example, and for that refer to my first point about lack off effort.

Not so false today