bobobonators

Except Green Bay, Miami, Oakland, and Dallas had much better DVOA's; and all ranked higher at creating turnovers. And guess what, all of those defenses had to deal with their offense turning the ball over at a much higher rate than our powder puff group.

Thank you. Please end this nonsense. Shut her down.

I'd rather focus on their imaginary ranking.

Flawed thinking imo. Getting better overall means continuing to improve on a top 10 offense by keeping the system in place, the QB in place, giving the QB an actual off season with the coordinator, having a healthy WR corps, adding a small piece to the offensive side to maybe help imrove it even more, all while addressing the real issue: a very below average defense. Thats getting better overall imo. Losing the OC and replacing the QB isnt getting better overall, its blowing it up and hoping for the best.

Why do people continue to say that the Chargers have no running game? Melvin Gordon and Danny Woodhead are good RB's. They have no running game b/c SD is a pass-first team for the most part, just like the Bills don't have a passing game b/c they're a run-first team. All those lovely passing stats, and San Diego, since the start of 2015, has scored less points than Buffalo: Buffalo: 778 points. SD: 730 points. But look at those passing yards, surely San Diego must be making it to the playoffs every year. 2010: 9-7 2011: 8-8 2012: 7-9 2013: 9-7 2014: 9-7 2015: 4-12 2016: 5-11 Super Bowl

He already has an outstanding running back in sd

So logically he would be interested in Buffalo.

Ball is still in the Chiefs court. The Chiefs can tag him again, if necessary. Berry is 28; Poe is 26. If you look at the Chiefs' roster (specifically DL), Poe is expendable. The Chiefs have plenty of young talent with Chris Jones, Nunez-Roches, and Allen Bailey on that DL. And this isn't even addressing Poe's up and down play compared to Berry's All-Pro play. Under no scenario will the Chiefs keep Poe and let Berry walk.

Both arguments made by many people in this thread are understandable. Childress is not sexy. He hasnt had a superb amount of success but has had success. Same with Olson. Neither of them excite me. But neither really scares me. We already got the hot young up and coming coach and hes our HC. I want his staff to be a little more experienced for support. Thats just my personal prefernce.

Lmao. Youre the genius that brought race into the convo

I want SMART players. Not some idiot with a strong arm.

agreed.

Reasonable. I'm personally curious to see what Cardale can do down the line. He's got plenty of tools. I was talking to a friend yesterday who's a big Cowgirls fan...after all this buzz about the cowgirls and how great they were this season. In the end, what was different this season than the rest of those seasons under Romo? Nothing, really.

Not to mention that 2 of those 4 (Rodgers and Brady) are not only HOF, but the top 3 QB's of all time (Manning/Brady/Rodgers). Speaking of Rodgers, I didn't realize he was getting so old. I thought he was 31 but he's already 33. Best QB to ever play the game IMO - he draws up school-yard plays in the huddle to beat the Cowgirls. Greatest ever.

So 4 future HOF QB's are left in the playoffs.... Where and when can we get one of those?

Don't let him leave the room Daniel

You feel bad for the Cowboys?

Ortiz seems obvious to me. And there was smoke with him too (in that report that was never made official)

lmao..every 5 hours? How generous of you.

KC isn't letting him go. Two big decisions KC has is Poe and Berry, and they'll let Poe walk in order to sign Berry if they have to.

I disagree.

??

Well Childress isn't new. Watching Bell is water torture. If I was a KC fan i'd be frantically yelling at the TV to drill the guy.

that play looked ugly

ha