All_Pro_Bills

$200k the tip of the iceberg. But let's send them both to jail. You good with that?

More interesting is the hospital's bankruptcy filing stating the $600K "loan" to James Biden was for procurement of assistance with acquiring financial assistance with Middle Eastern investors. James upon receiving the funds into his account wrote Joe the 200K check. So let's see the Biden's produce evidence backing up the expected claim James is paying Joe back. Should be easy. So, still no evidence. Boy, I wish my brother would send me a $200K check!

$98 Billion. I don't have any objection to providing support for who our government considers "allies". What I object to is the business model employed by the people in Washington. Its bad, for American taxpayers. Congress passes legislation, the President signs it, the Treasury authorizes the borrowing of $98,000,000,000, and the US taxpayer assumes the liability of paying the money back. In this arrangement the taxpayers assume 100% of the direct cost and derive 0% of the direct benefit. Who gets the benefit? The politicians, the foreign countries, and the people supplying the goods and services the $98B covers. Its equivalent to you footing the bill for an expensive meal for 20 "friends" while you're left to stand on the sidewalk outside the restaurant watching them enjoy their meal through the front window. What a pal they all say! Who would agree to such an arrangement with their personal finances? If we're on the hook for the payments its reasonable to expect something back. Isn't it? How about Israel and Ukraine send the US treasury every year for 20 years 5% of their tax receipts in order to service the loans? Something like this? Ancient Rome used to charge about 10% for protection and support. Simply, the US Empire's system of financing support for allies and provinces is flawed. Its inverted. Not only to we get nothing in return, we pay them! How can we afford this? We're already $33 Trillion in the hole with no way out.

And pro democrat, right?

The key concept to comprehend is avoiding the problem in the first place. Not so much damage control. Under Biden our enemies no longer fear us and our friends no longer respect us. But the slow-thinking self-proclaimed progressive geniuses among us haven't caught up to the reality of this yet. "Don't under-estimate Joe Biden's ability to ***** things up" - Barrack Obama.

Key points to listen for: Keep the money flowing for more wars that we have to borrow. Watch out for MAGA white supremacists. Leave the border open. Celebrate Pride month all year long. Keep gasoline and food prices high. Ignore crimes against citizens. Prosecute critics and opponents of the government with made-up crimes. Continue lowering education standards in support of inclusion. Remember to use preferred pronouns on the road to Hell we're on. Most important whatever goes wrong it's not my fault because the Russians did it.

Buckle your seatbelts and assume crash positions!

No matter what view anyone might have on this interruption of an official proceeding, how some point out the nuances and differences between this and J6 to argue its not a crime under the books, or others argue by the letter of the law its disrupting the official actions of government regardless of the protocol for entered the building, we all know a couple things for certain. The DOJ will show no lust or desire to prosecute anyone involved because the people involved are generally considered political allies of the administration. No hearings, no indictments, no show trials in front of judges supportive of the government's cases. And the media will move the story quickly off the front page to facilitate the public forgetting the event as quickly as possible.

Yet ironically, that POS did far less damage to the country than the walking cadevour of a President you support has done in less than 3 years. Best to prepare for a complete and unmitigated disaster before the term is over rather than fixating on Trump.

Flynn's comments do not make him a Nazi. I interpret his comments as asking why given numerical superiority they didn't fight back? That's not equivalent to blame. To suggest blame is a creative way of avoiding any conversation about the question. I think that passive collective submission is a fundamental reason why Israeli's take a hard line "never again" approach to threats of genocide from the likes of Hamas and Iran's clerical regime.

While leaving the border open for over a year and when something happens wondering where our intelligence gathering failed! At the same time avoiding the obvious answer.

And that unwavering support has gotten the US involved in exactly what? Another dumpster fire. Its amazing how nobody in charge takes the time to evaluate and understand the consequences before they go off on these adventures. Or maybe they do and just don't give a damn about those consequences. The latter is more likely. The Russians have achieved their objectives and no amount of wishful thinking is going to get the occupied territory back, Europe's economy is a mess, the western alliance is fragmenting, we're about $150 billion in the hole, all told about a half million soldiers and citizens between the adversaries are dead and plus or minus 1/2 of Ukraine's population has left the country. If that's the results we get with a policy of unwavering support, then no thank you. Being completely objective viewing things from the position of an impartial observer, it all could have been avoided with some extensive diplomacy and negotiation which included understanding and acknowledging everyone's interests. Once the Russians concluded negotiating with the US/Europe was senseless the path to war was the only option (they said so too). They also said expanding NATO to Ukraine was a red line. This was dismissed also. What's mind blowing is all this was obvious to me, and others here, viewing the situation 6,000 miles away but all the experts we employ in Washington and the foreign service around the world couldn't see this outcome as the most likely!

Just like the 70's all over again!

They must have some kind of a death wish. I recommend a demonstration of their misplaced support by suggesting they envision holding a Pride parade in any one of many places where Hamas like groups rule the roost. If anyone expects there's more than one response that would be produced by that event from those savages you're mind must be malfunctioning. But of course the left's support for Hamas is not rational and it is not genuine. It just suits their need for attention and another opportunity to highlight their obsession with the oppression/oppressor game. Just another part of their make-believe reality denying view of their world.

Democracy is sometimes messy and if you want a political system of government where every single party member falls into line with the party leadership and the interests they serve where no discussion, debate, or objections are allowed on every vote on every issues regardless of the specific interests of the constituents they represent and their personal principles then that's not much of a democracy and maybe more akin to tribalism or top-down authoritarianism. Why people think a democracy is where you have the right to elect an empty suit to put in a seat at the Capitol to automatically and unconsciously vote yes or no at some leader's desire is amazing.

I think anyone that buys into the belief that Trump or people supporting him are salivating over the possibility of a dictatorship are delusional and swallowing lots of left-wing fear porn propaganda without thinking that its the other guys that are working censorship and thought suppression operations via social media arrangements. Which are prerequisites for a dictatorship I might add. I think you need to look across the street to the other side to find the team cheering on authoritarianism. Second, I don't hold Trump in any regard, don't support him, and prefer other candidates but it's clear to me these suits are completely motivated by politics. A poll I saw indicated 60% plus Americans agree with that assessment.

Curious. Many here made similar arguments with regard to the war in Ukraine suggesting Russia was provoked to attack by actions from NATO, the US, and Ukraine itself before the actual invasion. Just as the settlements pushed Hamas into action the arming of Ukraine and efforts to join NATO provoked Russia into action. But you dismissed that argument and completely blamed Russia saying that argument appeases Putin. But here you're willing to give the attacker, Hamas, a pass suggesting they were provoked while absolving them of responsibility. So what's the distinction between the two situations you're making? Is it you don't like Israel and you don't like Russia?

Doesn't sound like much of a "secret" if they're blabbing about it on X, does it?

Words to live by if your in the 9th century AD.

I think what's really going on is regardless of these indictments and trials, which a majority of American's view as completely politically motivated, the DNC and their allies are crapping their pants at the prospect of a Trump/Biden 2.0 in 2024. As Trump leads in the polls, with Biden is fading, and all the problems and issues that Trump is strong on are coming to the forefront as issues American's are most concerned about. Open borders, crime, terrorism, the economy. Democrats have few cards to play that might be effective beyond the issue of abortion and the race card. As what I expect will unfold over time leading to the election as living conditions and standards in the country deteriorate further nobody will much care about those things or see them as personal priorities. They're play might be to dump Biden/Harris and present a Hail Mary savior-like candidate drafted for the top of the ticket to try and save the day for the party.

I think the best you can expect in season is for the HC to hold the OC and the players accountable, call together a session with the, OC, Josh, and the other leaders on the offense to have an open and honest discussion about what needs to be done to re-charge the offense. Using analytics identify which plays are working and not, get rid of the plays that aren't working, run more of what's working, and design some variation off what is working.

I think the O is too predictable with formation and personal groups telegraphing way too much to the defense and their DC. As an example, whenever I see Diggs run off the field for a couple plays my first impulse is to think the next play is a run. If you focus on the run in those situations you'd be playing the correct percentage.

I expected the Bills were going to destroy this Giants team and I also expect every single Bills player and coach felt the same way. And not only did they fail to do that, they almost lost, and maybe deserved to lose. Everybody says the right thing about respect for the opponent and not taking any team lightly on the schedule but that might be what they did last night. Thinking just showing up would be enough. While the other guys came to play and take care of business. Maybe some mental toughness and focus is missing and that's something the coaches need to take care of ASAP.

What specific truths do they hate?

I'll wager you won't find a single Hamas supporter among the MAGA "cult" but you sure can find lots of them in liberal enclaves like universities and think tanks. Many lib's are more than sympathetic to the terrorists even though they'd surely slaughter them as quickly as any Trump "supporter". They're nothing short of delusional, and simply stupid. When those sleeper cells get activated and the scum bags blow up some campus buildings somewhere they might wise up, but I doubt it.