Einstein (the Joe Theisman definition), I didn't write the article nor make the statements for Obama. What is so hateful? Why not address the facts? Nevermind...I've read a few of your past posts and know you are incapable of debating with any degree of coherence.
This is the equivalent of the guy who gets caught with his Jauron in some broad in his own bed by his wife and he says "It wasn't me!"
And the stepford wife says, "Oh, Ok honey, what do you want for dinner?"
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090429/D97SCPI00.html
Wait...It's Bush's fault!
Hey, nice work! You've made it to the second page! Just 28 or so more to go to match to outrage over a teen getting pregnant and deciding to have the baby and whose mother was against abortion. Terrible!
And I don't know if she's a whore, but she sure is hot!
I know it'll take awhile for you apologists to get it in gear.
Well, it is a big news story when the VP's daughter is responsible for the violence in Mexico.
This thread should be good for at least the 20-30 pages Palin's daughter's pregnacy provoked...
Like Rick James used to say, "Cocaine is a hell of a drug!"
Link? What is narrow and partisian about the link I submitted? I do not disagree that there was a push to balance the budget during that time, I remember it well. I understand the statistics I presented. Where are yours to the contrary? The fact remains that Don posted an opinion which I countered and you seem to support, but neither of you have provided any evidence to refute my argument. WTF does the USDA have to do with military pay and Don's original statement? Show me the money or STFU.
If you re-read the post you'll see I've not commented on "Clinton Bad' but merely pointed out that Don (and you) were wrong. End of story.
Again Yellow Lines- Note Don's opinion that I responded to with facts, not opinion. I asked him on more than one occasion in this thread to clarify or provide evidence of his claim. He hasn't and now you jump into the fray with your bullschit? What 'med reform' is he talking about. Since you are the jock strap supporting him, maybe you can assist with his weak azz argument.
The best he can come up with is "Zing!"?
So statistics suck when they don't support your argument?
I guess the percentage drop in the markets over the past year and a half are an illusion too, right?
You're a gem.
Look, I'm not trying to start a pissing contest with you but merely point out the inaccuracy of your memory of the 'good old' Clinton days. I too served during that time and had a different memory, so I did some quick research and found that chart. The statistics on that chart are the same that Congress and the Gov't use to measure the gap between an index of civilian pay and military pay. I didn't cherry pick it; it is what it is.
It's not win/lose for me. I also asked you to further explain your claim that he increased other benefits above what other administrations did and you offered no information. I really don't give a !@#$ buddy.
I love this place! You've got some nerve Tom, you whitebread, cracker, nager-lovin, spic smelling (just made that up), retarded Republican jew!
Me thinks we need a politically incorrect joke thread so we can really offend the PC crowd.
Um, yes. Did you even look at the link I posted? The military LOST GROUND WRT the civilian pay gap during the Clinton years. The gap rose from 11.5% to 13.5%. What part of that is difficult for you to understand?
Again, facts suck don't they?
I didn't say he did. Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it? I merely pointed out the his statement that he "saw more pay raises" during the Clinton administration was factually incorrect.