Chump Change

Oh, that's right...the whole Nozzlenut thingy. Now I get it! As far as being an ****, try to take a dose of your own medicine before recommending it for others.

(In my best Tony Soprano voice) !@#$ the GM bondholders! If they got a problem wit dat, Lenny here is gonna bust some heads!

Politico is right leaning? Um, OK. Nice attempt at spin there. The bottom line is that Joe Wilson WAS right. Even if he was out of order, which I don't dispute, he was correct thast the President was telling a bold faced lie (that was just one of many in the speech). If he was incorrect, then why the sudden changes in the proposal from the Whitehouse yesterday? If Wilson is going to be your rallying cry, the Dems have real problems.

Is Blzrul completely off the reservation? Could this be one of her new personalities? Or is Bad Leftennent feeling lonely?

One reason I'm opposed to this bill is because as a Tricare for Life benefit recipient, it will vastly raise my annual premiums and cost share starting in 2011. According to the CBO, starting in 2011, my annual premium will rise from $490 per year to $1100 per. It would initiate cost sharing to require retirees to pay the first $525 of medical cost and 50% of the next $4,725 for a first year cost of $2,888 per person. It would also be indexed to increase with inflation. A reason given for this action (for PR effect) is "overuse" by Retirees. So that is my rationale for opposition to the bill. If you want a link to the CBO report, PM me and I'll send you the link as well as where you can find the information I'm referring to.

I'm not, nor do I need to be funded by anyone to know this legislation is a POS. All that is necessary is reading the bill. Keep up with the Daily Kooks talking points Dumbazz Deb. Oh, wait...I made a funny! Should I copyright it?

According to PJ, you're an astroturfer...

Why would they? He is half white isn't he?

I don't disagree with you. By my count GW either created or appointed a total of 12 "czar" type positions during his administration. In seven short months Obama has racheted this up to 32 special appointments! That to me is more than a bit troubling. Especially when he ran on a platform of transparency and openess in government. And don't forget, two wrongs do not make a right. I don't often agree with Sen. Byrd, but in this case I think he is spot on with his objection to all these unvetted aides.

I'm interested to hear a Democrat's take on this. Regardless of the party, this is a bit troubling. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...9072902624.html

Otay, Buttwheat!

So you've resorted to responding to your own thread when nobody cares what you posted. Nice job. LOL! Keep typing to yourself and eventually Nozzle the nut or pBills will chime in for you.

What doesn't this have to do with Obama? He is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces. You don't know what this means do you? He is also a smoker. But don't worry...he doesn't let his children see him smoke. This also has everything to do with Gov't health care. Once the Gov't completely runs things (Oh, I forgot...we'll still have a private option), how long until they prohibit smoking for all of us? BTW, are you of the opinion that weed should be legalized? Just curious.

This is total bullsh-- and indicative of what you'll see if Obamer is able to force his health care initiative through. So according to many here we should legalize pot, but make tobacco use for our soldiers illegal. Yes, that makes sense. I don't smoke. I am 100% cured, unlike the chickenschit, lame azz statement from your President, but this IS a civil liberties issue. Let the men and women smoke 'em if they got 'em.

So that is how you respond to getting your ass kicked with logic. Nice! Keep posting dude, this is getting good!

This is getting good! Keep posting pBills.

That Blzrul dude is a chick? Wow...(s)he had me fooled. (S)he's probably got some junk tucked in there.

What i meant was cede influence to Venezuela. I think you knew what I meant, but thanks for calling me a dumbass, sperm burper.

So what should the Honduran Gov't have done differently? Allowed an illegal referendum to proceed? If the President was offered a choice of being arrested or resign and be exiled, why wouldn't the US support what transpired there? We are basically handing this country to Chavez and his stooges (not that it's ours to give, but you know what I mean).

Seriously, what else is missing? The President tries to use a method not authorized in their constitution to change the constitution where he can run again (along the line of what Chavez did). The legislature, supreme court and military (including many from his own party) said "You can't do this"; He tries to do it anyway and they remove him (peacefully) from office and install someone from his very party to serve out the remainder of the term until the next election. It's not like the military removed him and then the General stepped up. They did what they thought was best for their country. Why the hell aren't we supporting this? Chavez is going to send his boys in there and start running things...then what? What drug is the State Dept on?

My favorite quote from that article: Convicted robber Mavin Cabido, 23, said: "I feel so sad as we idolize him really. The moonwalk is my favorite -- I like that." LOL!

This is awesome news! http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20090629/ten-gr...de-8a3eada.html

I heard on CNN that there are plans to commemorate his life. They specifically mentioned the McDonalds was introducing 'for a limited time' a commemoritive sandwich called the "McMichael". Apparently it is made of a 50 year old weiner stuffed in side of two ten year old buns. I'm sure it will be a big hit with Bishop Hedd...

When are we going to this with our "Government?" Sorry...wrong forum. Please disregard...

I want to agree with you but it depends on what the meaning of the word "shocked" is.