thebandit27

Truth. Phenomenal person.

I agree. Strip them of every Lombardi they've ever won. Anyone that defends that organization is delusional.

Oh I know. I believe that if the league accepts that, then they're 100% complicit in yet another Patriots cheating scandal

Don't know and don't care. I'd rather have Burfict, and I'm completely serious

Horse *****. I dare anyone to explain that line of thinking. The most detail-oriented coach of all time, who has 100% autonomy over that organization, who has previously been punished for taping opponents' sidelines in perpetuity even after being warned, is going to allow an independent contractor to go handle video work at another team's stadium on behalf of the organization, while not bothering to ensure that every i is dotted and every T is crossed so that they don't get punished again? He just says "yeah whatever, that's fine"? No. *****. Way. They did it. Like always. They deliberately didn't tell the Bengals--who just happen, by total coincidence, to be their next opponent, and they filmed their sideline to get a competitive advantage. It's what they do. First the cheat off the field, then they cheat on the field. Like when they played here: They aren't good enough to win fair anymore, so they head hunt the starting QB and then try to take out the backup on his 2nd snap. It's their identity. Win at all costs, and always do whatever is necessary, within or outside the rules, to gain an edge.

Edelman and it isn't close. He's a complete scumbag that gets away with whatever he wants. He can talk smack all game, but Jerry Hughes can't even sneeze without an unsportsmanlike penalty. He can call for a fair catch and then head butt someone (twice in the same game and thrice in the same season actually) and it doesn't even get flagged. He's a POS.

Right now we're in Stage 1 of the latest Patriots****** cheating scandal: "we didn't do it" Stay tuned for Stage 2: "if we did it (but we didn't), then it didn't give us any competitive advantage" Followed eventually by Stage 3: "if we did it (but we didn't), and it gave us a competitive advantage (but it didn't), then everyone else is doing it too"

Nah, a dude with a raging agenda could do it too.

Oh FFS the Beasley throw is perfect. You're out to lunch.

My hyperbole? What you've said about him repeatedly is out there for all to see. You literally called him a horrible football player at Wyoming. From "he's horrible" pre draft to "he'll never be accurate" last year to "he'll never beat a good defense" this year to "well his deep ball still sucks" now, you've seemed to have an agenda from day 1. In this very post you're comparing him to EJ Manuel. EJ. Manuel. Right here.

Wow. Looked like Peters got it clean on the game broadcast replay. Now sometimes still shots can be manipulated (not by you, just by timing a pause just right), but that does make me want to see it again.

Depends...have you used that adjective to describe everything about him since his days at Wyoming? Because if the answer is yes, then it's going to be really difficult to have it taken seriously when you use it now.

That's literally the opposite of what almost everyone has said to you directly. Just be honest about it; leave hyperbole out.

Very glad we don't play them this week. Look what happened in the first quarter of the Dallas game the week after they got jobbed against NE.

I'd like to see that one again from the eye in the sky.

I wouldn't call it a drop if it never hit his hands. I would say, however, that (irrespective of that play) Brown shows a bothersome lack of competitiveness on critical passes.

I find it more odd than anything else. But then again, if you're married to a take and are willing to go down with it, I suppose it makes some sense.

Indeed I gave McKenzie a drop on the end zone ball that hit him in the hands I feel like Devin mis-timed his jump; he probably could've had that one

Great post. Same story as the NE game. It was obvious that the game plan needed to be centered on short passes to backs and TEs; zero targets to backs and TEs until the 3rd quarter. And then, magically, they put together a TD drive throwing to backs and TEs. It's like he feels the need to outsmart himself.

Good. Even if you're wrong, give 'em an earful. Refs are human; they look for makeup calls. We got 'em when we needed 'em too. Gotta work the refs; the good ones all do it.

Denver has the #6 pass defense in football, allowing 6.9 YPA and 216 YPG. They have allow an average passer rating of 87.9. Pittsburgh has the #5 pass defense in football, allowing 6.9 YPA and 210 YPG. They allow an average passer rating of 81.2. I wouldn't call them MUCH better.

He didn't have a good game against Denver? I'm an Allen guy...he had a BAD game.

The whole game plan was amiss for what they needed to accomplish. Allen clearly functions better when he starts with quick-hit rhythm throws, and thusly doth the run game follow. There's no excusing Josh's poor play yesterday. It is, however, quite obvious that the OC either doesn't know how to layer his route concepts to beat the blitz, or doesn't believe that he has the players that can win matchups within those concepts.

I thought it was brilliant

There's no point. He's already said that he won't show up when the Bills win OR when Josh plays well because "there's nothing to talk about". He basically staked his reputation on "Allen is horrible" back in March of 2018 and so now he's married to it.