aristocrat

why would you be upset? The bills spoke to the victims attorney. Unless the attorney left information out they looked into this and decided araiza was fine to play. He still might be innocent in this. What happens then?

The bills attorney spoke to the victims attorney. Do you think he left info out when talking to the bills? Doubt it

This is hilarious. Google some things but maybe you shouldn’t cause you’ll go down a rabbit hole you’ll never recover from.

did he leave out information? New info? Not sure what else they needed to talk about if he gave them the info on what happened

So I think the bills attorney may not have communicated to mcbeane exactly what happened. I’d have to assume he spelled out what happened to his client pretty clearly cause he doesn’t seem like a guy who is going to sugarcoat anything. the bills attorney also spoke to araizas attorney as well and she must have gotten some pretty good intel that Matt and them would be in the clear. It would seem she simply gave them some info that a girl was raped and Matt was there but not involved. Then the story comes out as to how vicious the assault was and now you have the shock the staff is in.

Sad if they let it go. Last time I had it was catering for a funeral maybe 5-6 years ago. I’ll check Michael’s out next time I’m in town.

Violas subs are amazing, como for some Italian food on pine. If you want to walk around go down to Lewiston.

this is not true. They had one phone call with her attorney and an email detailing the accusation. They did not speak to the victim but likely cause that’s a risky situation considering you don’t want to interfere in a criminal investigation.

we don’t know they took it lightly. They spoke to both attorneys and probably tried the police. What if they know no charges are coming? His attorney seems pretty confident in no charges. If he thought they were coming he’d be saying much different things.

In there it says the police didn’t interview araiza until last month? That’s strange

It won’t be a topic cause he won’t be on the team. No controversy

If he’s charged he gets released immediately.

Here's the issue with just outright releasing him right now. If he turns out to be innocent it hurts accusers in the future. It gives the idiots who victim blame more ammo to be degenerates. Then the next time something like this happens they go remember that punter who got cut he was innocent.blah blah blah. Just keep him inactive until this is settled by the DA and civil courts.

Very true though I believe it's gotten quite a bit better with training. Most of the time these things tend to be he said she said which when you're inncoent until proven guilty it doesn't work out for the victim.

https://calmatters.org/commentary/my-turn/2021/04/law-enforcement-should-get-backlog-of-rape-kits-tested/ How then could the audit’s statewide total of 13,929 untested rape kits be anything but a significant undercount? Law enforcement’s indifference to the backlog reporting requirement is stunning. An analysis based on reporting agencies listed in the audit shows: The victim feels like the cops are stalling but the issue likely is her rape kit has taken a long time to test.

Rape kits take a long time to come back. Some states have kits tht have sat for over a year. So her kit may have just come back weeks ago.

We can also have him place on the exempt list until this whole thing gets sorted out and cut him after that.

this lawyer going for headlines and trying the case in the media

what is the fbi covering up for joe and hunter? You want them investigated to clear this misunderstanding up right?