LeviF

I hear the strip clubs in Atlanta have pretty good wings.

This is correct, but also hilarious coming from the dude whose schtick has gone from pretending to be a communist version of a football talk show personality to just reacting thumbs down on every post they could find. And again, I'll accept the Supreme Court line once we can have a discussion about how the entire national political agenda of the LGBTQ crowd was shoved down our throats, so to speak, by the courts, and then those same courts were used to punish the perceived political enemies of the gays. This of course all coming AFTER the largest state in the union voted gay marriage down by direct vote. In summary, shut up, dork.

Are conservatives advocating for the unfettered slaughter of those children? Can you point to a link? They use it because they believe it to be dehumanizing. It betrays their line of thinking, which has no logical endpoint re: the time at which it is no longer ok to kill the child.

You know, I was almost ready to have a serious conversation with you until you dropped this and demonstrated how unserious you really are.

How is this issue analogous?

There is no moral imperative to educate or persuade those who would toss their children into Moloch’s gaping maw.

And Cleveland has to be being stubborn on that point. As mentioned above his salary is fully guaranteed, everybody knows he isn’t their guy, and Cleveland has earned zero favors from anyone in the league at this point.

Before modernist/postmodernist thinking we had bastardy laws on the books and bastard trials where the father most likely responsible was determined and care for the child arranged for. Leftists are constantly reinventing the traditional ways that they are trying so hard to forget. lol this idiot. We can put capital punishment on the table for rape. You good with that?

If you let them keep going long enough, they re-invent traditional marriage. Leftists: “Well, if men are going to pass laws outlawing the killing of pre-born children, they should pass laws that the fathers of the children can’t leave and need to take financial care of the mother and child!” Trads: “…ok then.”

And the answer to that question is still "yes." But then you change the question. You add caveats and qualifiers and pretend as if I'm the unreasonable one for asking that you just not. And ignore the fact that abortions legally fall under the same category as another example you provided yourself - stop signs - while firearms explicitly do not. That the answers to the initial questions are inconvenient to your backwards political "thinking," if one can truly call it that, really isn't my problem. If you wish to know my more complete thoughts on how the AR-15 is found in the Constitution, we have a reasonably active gun thread in this subforum that you may ask your silly questions in.

Why do you keep changing the question? If you don't like the answer to the original question perhaps you should examine why that is rather than play silly games.

And I can. And again, that's a different question than asking for the location of an "explicit" quotation, isn't it? Now is you done or is you finished?

Hm, but see, I responded to a different question. You don't get to change the question and maintain that I have the same answer, or even that the new answer would be relevant to the initial question.

Ah, see, now we're playing the motte and bailey again. Nice try, but this is not what I said.

In your experience, do homicide victims typically testify at trial? Yes, I could. And yes, I do. Because my state has passed a law mandating that I stop at them, as is their right under the 10th Amendment since, as you say, stop signs aren't in the Constitution.

"Now do guns." No you. The right to own firearms is enshrined explicitly in our Constitution. If you want the same for abortion get the ball rolling on an amendment. The two issues have literally no legal commonality.

It's funny you mention MTG. MTG and Madison Cawthorn have basically the exact same platform. They're both obnoxious. Both make the establishment Republicans feel embarrassed and/or annoyed. But only one is being subjected to a dripping kompromat campaign. The same one who has publicly talked about drug parties and orgies frequented by GOP leaders. The G is far less ideological than most think.

I'm not sure it's been impressed how serious the leaking of a SCOTUS draft opinion is. It's one of the worst possible things that can happen in our government, and that statement would only be slightly mitigated if it turned out to be the work of a hacker rather than a source inside the Court itself.

Cawthorn: “yeah these old guard Republicans love cocaine and Eyes Wide Shut parties” Kompromat drops constantly within a month of this allegation of his. Coincidence?

Haven't seen a dude get stomped out on stage like that since the old Source Awards.

What’s really incredible is that they clearly put thousands of man hours into a hit piece and couldn’t up with a single accusation of racism or other heresy against the state religion. Considering the low bar for those I can only conclude that Carlson is like the nicest dude on the planet.

Overturn Griswold while you’re at it. The Warren Court was a disaster.

Why so serious?

Dudes taking upskirts.

The home of women-only train cars and phones you can't silence the camera "shutter" sound effect on.