LeviF

They made him test his DNA then when he was vindicated they still won't let him change it lmao

In case you didn’t already know, dressing her up and letting her play act as a jurist is part of your humiliation.

Sex and the City moment? So...she's insufferable and going to be single well into her 40s?

When Norm got cancer he didn't even tell anyone. Spare me. So in sum delusional pit owners were able to self-report that their dogs were just the sweetest things that would never hurt a fly. Very cool, "science."

Oh, is that how it’s supposed to work?

That was already tried and rebutted. It doesn’t work for Mexico (without massive immigration, which again defeats your point) and it definitely doesn’t work for the floods of people coming from south of Mexico.

I already did. He’s being dishonest and obtuse. It’s not the first time, as I’ve noted within the last couple months. Anyone with eyes can see that Mexico and the US share little other than a border.

Popular opinion is nay, I think. I say yea because Tony himself says in the beginning of the series *SPOILER* that the only way out for guys like him is prison or death. There wasn't gonna be an ending that validated everyone's sympathies for the psychopathic main character. At least not one that was consistent with the rest of the series.

lol I meant his wife 😅

@boyst is she still mad at me?

The most predictable ***** in the world lmao

I should probably just remember what I’ve said about you in the past.

Nah he just gets dragged by the leftists he died trying to please.

ok lol

As I already said, the post was a rebuttal to the statement that Mexico and the USA share a culture. Those characteristics are strikes against that particular thought. I have a lot of respect for medical doctors and the training and education required to obtain that title, but man you guys are literally the opposite of the “jack of all trades” trope.

I didn’t say that, your reading comprehension is (again) demonstrably poor.

So the books of the Kings, the words of the major and minor prophets, all can be cast aside according to Catholic doctrine? I think not. I have no beef with Catholics (especially on Fridays during Lent).

I'm sure that the Bible has some words on literal idol smashing. What are they ignoring? You're starting to sound like this:

If you can't speak in good faith what's the point of even replying? The vast majority of the Bible calls for a literal reading. Whether Genesis 1-11 does or does not has been debated by people smarter than us. Moses is an allegory? Again, what jew would have felt that way in the first century? And just stop with the parable *****. Parables are stories told to illustrate the point. But the *literal reading* would be that Jesus literally spoke the parables. Not that someone made them up later to make the teachings of Jesus easier to digest.

The US acquired Catholic territory (New France, New Spain) by conquest and land purchases, then acquired large influxes of Catholics later by Ellis Island and, even later, the southern border.

lol Leaving aside the types of literature found in the text, allegorical interpretations of a text do not preclude literal readings as well. Paul describes Abraham's baby mommas in an allegorical fashion in his letter to the Galatians; do you suppose that a first century jew did not believe that Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar were real people?

Reading is hard, huh? The post you quote is a rebuttal to the idea that the USA shares a culture with Mexico.