SageAgainstTheMachine

While we're at it, we should ask our doctor about Levitre.

Drinking and driving is a menace. Always get the drinking out of the way first.

I don't think so. Both are derived from indie comic series, but I think they're two different things entirely. Kick Ass was pretty awesome.

The reasoning, I think, is that the penalty for hitting into a hazard is not being able to judge the nature and consistency of the hazard, so a little guess work has to go into any sand-shot. Really though, it's just one of golf's dumb rules. Did you know that if you hit the ball, and the ball hits a tree in front of you and ricochets back and hits you, it's a 2-stroke penalty? My dad enforced that on me once.

The linebacker covering the TE lost him, not Whitner.

I think the very fact that Dustin Johnson was competing at the end of this thing shows that he's got the mental fortitude, considering what happened at Pebble Beach.

There's also a young Japanese player (I think 19) named Ryo Ishikawa who will be contending for majors for a long long time. Everyone's bemoaning the downfall of Tiger, but this might be the most exciting golf has ever been since Tiger first arrived IMO.

I understand that a lot of people can't stomach watching golf...but Big Brother? Really?

To be fair, all the golfers were specifically warned about varying bunker types. It's a hose job from the perspective of common sense (but when has golf ever been about common sense? ). BUT Dusty should have consulted with a rules official when he first saw the ball lying in sand.

On a team full of losers at the QB position, it's pretty natural that the unknown quantity becomes the popular choice. That said, we don't really know anything about Levi Brown. There were plenty of people saying pretty much these exact same things about Trent when Losman was the loser-du-jour. Of course, if Levi ever does get a chance to start a few games and performs poorly, then he's the next whipping boy. And the beat goes on.

Fail.

For tv shows, go with hulu. For movies, use surfthechannel and use the megavideo links. For whatever reason, going directly to megavideo is less reliable.

And one reason our society can't have honest discussions about anything is that guys like you think that any attitude besides "just ignore it" is somehow unmasculine.

Well, they say that all good things must come to an end. I guess that same rule applies to annoying and bothersome things.

Been here for the summer, actually, working, hiking, wining and dining.

We're all back! Back on the pile, everybody.

I've been on a one hour or two year hiatus. Look forward to discussing things with you all.

Oh, I agree that we've made numerous positive steps and that racism is held in relative check in mainstream America these days (The KKK, black panthers, neo-nazis still exist, but they're much more on the outskirts these days). My point is just that, on the other side of the spectrum, wishing for a "color blind" society might be unrealistic too, because something as outwardly apparent as skin color will always be a form of intrinsic identity. As you said, we have to move closer to seeing skin color without judging it.

Bizarre, isn't it? The most common story is that the parent is exhausted and incorrectly thought that the child was in the possession of the other parent.

This is all well and good in theory, but just take a look at human history and you'll see that people will never stop identifying themselves in terms of race. It's human nature and no amount of generational introspection will ever completely fix it. People will continue to associate primarily with others of their own race, primarily wed with others of their own race, etc. The best that we can do is to erase the "us versus them" mentality and replace it with "us with them". And really, has the "great melting pot" ever really existed the way that we think about it? There has always been hostility when mixing races and cultures. Again, I think that the best we can do is to honestly recognize that we're different and be peaceful about it, not just pretend that we're all the same.

So, it seems that you're proud of your Italian heritage and at least a little bit bothered by the stereotypes you see. How would you like it if the biggest sports team representing your hometown was called the Dagos or the WOPs? And even if that didn't bother you, what right do you have to tell other people how to feel?

The general rule of thumb is that you don't lose a starting job due to injury unless the replacement completely blows everyone away. In any case, with the amount that we'll be running the ball this season (probably like a 60/40 ratio running to passing), there will be plenty of carries to go around for all the healthy backs.

Do you honestly believe that this event wouldn't have occurred if handguns were illegal? Murder is illegal and these punks didn't seem to have any scruples about committing murder, so what convinces you that they'd be amenable to following handgun restriction laws?

Wait, you've been around since 2001 and you don't get crayonz' schtick yet? I think you need a date with code name Ennifer. She'll explains things for you (granted, it takes a little practice to understand her).

Seminoles isn't derogatory because it's the name of a tribe. Redskins IS derogatory because it's the rough equivalent of Negroes. If there were a team named the Negroes, would you argue that black people shouldn't feel offended because they are now "synonymous with football"?