A lot of people I respect here like Kuechly.
But I've been with Lurker on this one.
Here's the two things about Kuechly:
He played on a mediocre team with a mediocre line in front of him.
NO linebacker will look good in those circumstances… I recall people saying Ray Lewis was near the end of his career after the Ravens lost Sam Adams and Tony Siragusa. In other words, people were saying Ray Lewis was washed up in 2002. After the Ravens acquired Kelly Gregg and Haloti Ngata, suddenly Ray Lewis looked like the dominant LB he had always been. Truth is, Lewis' play never changed… only the quality of the players in front of him did. That's the way it is with linebackers. They are only as good as the guys protecting them.
On the negative side however, having watched a significant amount of video on Kuechly, I just don't see it… particularly Mayock's comments ring hollow. If you look at the BC-Clemson game from this most recent season, Kuechly looks completely lost in pass coverage… and yet Mayock says he's the best zone cover backer he's ever seen?
I'd take Mayock's word before mine of course but I also trust my own eyes and judgement so the disconnect makes me very wary of Kuechly.