Flbillsfan#1 Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 "[Trent Edwards statement] demonstrates zero accountability." BECAUSE HIS COACH DEMANDS ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY. Trent can be an excellent QB. He is coached by a man who tolerates failure because "it's hard to win in the NFL". FOLKS, WE JUST LOST TO A QB WHO WENT TWO FOR F-ING 16!!!! WAKE UP - IT'S NOT OUR QB THAT'S THE PROBLEM!!!! 9 false starts by a home football team only happens with pathetic coaching. Jauron is a failure because he tolerates failure, and has come to expect failure. He has coached that mindset into the team and the result shows. The fact that Dick is a TERRIBLE Coach does NOT change the FACT that Trent is a TERRIBLE QB. Trent is Coached by a man that HAND PICKED him. Think about that. A GOOD Coach would NEVER have chosen Trent to be his starting QB to begin with because Trent NEVER WAS, is not & NEVER will be a good QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WordByrd Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 There ya go. Happy? yup! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 He needs to be on-staff @ the Bills no way he would ever get hired, because he would be going off on pretty much everyone on the team every day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 He needs to be hit in the head with a beer bottle by a bills fan... That Bills fan's name? Jim Kelly. A-freakin'-men! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 The fact that Dick is a TERRIBLE Coach does NOT change the FACT that Trent is a TERRIBLE QB. Trent is Coached by a man that HAND PICKED him. Think about that. A GOOD Coach would NEVER have chosen Trent to be his starting QB to begin with because Trent NEVER WAS, is not & NEVER will be a good QB. Don't forget Modrak and Guy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StupidNation Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 "I'm not a Bills fan, I play for the Bills, so I can't answer that question." No excuse to ever say this. Sorry. Bills fans who aren't insulted are not real fans. You're not very bright. His response was in CONTEXT to the question asked. Wait... You've always said exactly what wouldn't hurt everyone's feelings on every word you've said your entire life... Yeah... sure... Not defending his play, but his comment/response was not inappropriate in CONTEXT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkAF43 Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 You're not very bright. His response was in CONTEXT to the question asked. Wait... You've always said exactly what wouldn't hurt everyone's feelings on every word you've said your entire life... Yeah... sure... Not defending his play, but his comment/response was not inappropriate in CONTEXT. TO was asked the same question, and to paraphrase his reply..... " yea I would" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 You're not very bright. His response was in CONTEXT to the question asked. Wait... You've always said exactly what wouldn't hurt everyone's feelings on every word you've said your entire life... Yeah... sure... Not defending his play, but his comment/response was not inappropriate in CONTEXT. Wasn't none too bright, though. There's better ways to phrase the same "I play the game, not watch it" sentiment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted October 11, 2009 Author Share Posted October 11, 2009 Wasn't none too bright, though. There's better ways to phrase the same "I play the game, not watch it" sentiment. And that's the whole reason this was brought up. Why did he answer it that way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWVaBeach Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 To put it in context for you, he was asked, "Trent, if you were a Bills fan would you Boo the team?" So, there. It wasn't an insult. It was a mamby-pamby reply, is all. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Can you imagine Jim Kelly responding to a question like that......Trent is done. Going back to a decade long career as a back up...the next Todd Collins. Sign J Garcia and at least we can be entertained by the Garcia/Owens reunion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Screw Jim Kelly. He does nothing for the Bills now except cheer them on like we do. I am sick of hearing about him. His days are lonnnnnnnng gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahham33 Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Can you imagine Jim Kelly responding to a question like that......Trent is done. Going back to a decade long career as a back up...the next Todd Collins.Sign J Garcia and at least we can be entertained by the Garcia/Owens reunion. i boo them every sunday... Keep Dick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 And that's the whole reason this was brought up. Why did he answer it that way? Seems sort of fitting. Same guy that didn't even know Brett Favre threw a laser to win a game a few weeks ago. The guy would rather be out working on his golf game. Not much different than saying: "I'm apathetic. I'm just here to collect a paycheck." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted October 11, 2009 Author Share Posted October 11, 2009 Screw Jim Kelly. He does nothing for the Bills now except cheer them on like we do. I am sick of hearing about him. His days are lonnnnnnnng gone. You're just a glowing ball of fun, aren't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 And that's the whole reason this was brought up. Why did he answer it that way? Because he's frustrated as hell and reacting (and that badly) rather than thinking. You could see it in his play. Twice I saw him get seriously pissed off at a false start penalty...he's not just taking this casually. But he's also not in control of...anything, really, which is really his biggest problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 You're not very bright. His response was in CONTEXT to the question asked. You are a fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 Besides showing zero guts or accountability, Trent's answer is infuriating to me because it's another example of my number one pet peeve: When people refuse to consider a hypothetical situation. Trent, you sorry bastard, we know you are not a fan. The question was what IF... You stupid !@#$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 and after playing a game as horrendous as that was, what is so hard about saying "Yeah, I would have boo'ed me"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 and after playing a game as horrendous as that was, what is so hard about saying "Yeah, I would have boo'ed me"? It's more inciting to be evasive and condescending? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts