Joma Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 First criminal charge. That's his appeal? Considering his first offense was free where he was driving drunk, hit a woman, and left the scene...and you're stupid if you believe otherwise as you know damn well that would be your take if he wasn't a Bill...he's getting off pretty light all things considered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 That's his appeal? Considering his first offense was free where he was driving drunk, hit a woman, and left the scene...and you're stupid if you believe otherwise as you know damn well that would be your take if he wasn't a Bill...he's getting off pretty light all things considered. Also he is not a Pat* so he can't expect any SPECIAL treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Senator Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Where's WEO? He usually chimes in on this topic, what do you think is fair, maybe the Death Penalty? He's where he always is - in bed with his life-sized Tommie* Brady* blowup doll, dreaming that his Cheatriettes* are going to the Superbowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KollegeStudnet Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 with the appeal...if lynchy shows that he's a good boy up until the end of preseason...the commish would reduce it down to two games at least-however if he rules just a one game suspension I'm for it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 That's his appeal? Considering his first offense was free where he was driving drunk, hit a woman, and left the scene...and you're stupid if you believe otherwise as you know damn well that would be your take if he wasn't a Bill...he's getting off pretty light all things considered. We've been over this a million times before you arrived. There is no evidence he was drunk, knew he hit the woman and thus left intentionally the scene. Much as some simps would like you to believe otherwise, there is nothing to support those claims. Hence the traffic ticket he got was appropriate. As for the gun charge, no one would get charged with a felony for a first-time charge of having an unregistered, loaded gun locked in a box in the trunk of a car. And the defense would be Brandon Marshall got his suspension reduced from 3 games to 1 for good behavior, and Tank Johnson, who was tagged twice with guns before getting suspended, was also offered a 2 game reduction if he stayed out of trouble (which he didn't). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Aaaaaand we're off ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Aaaaaand we're off ... Not on my end. I said my piece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joma Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 We've been over this a million times before you arrived. There is no evidence he was drunk, knew he hit the woman and thus left intentionally the scene. Much as some simps would like you to believe otherwise, there is nothing to support those claims. Hence the traffic ticket he got was appropriate. As for the gun charge, no one would get charged with a felony for a first-time charge of having an unregistered, loaded gun locked in a box in the trunk of a car. And the defense would be Brandon Marshall got his suspension reduced from 3 games to 1 for good behavior, and Tank Johnson, who was tagged twice with guns before getting suspended, was also offered a 2 game reduction if he stayed out of trouble (which he didn't). I'll be nice and back off the stupid comment, but you're incredibley naive if you think he wasn't under the influence... Why else do you take off? Give me one realistic reason to do so... As morally unfortunate as it is, you get in a lot less trouble for a hit and run than a DUI related accident. A completely innocent accident will at most cost you money...and probably only raised insurance rates because the potential law suit would go to your insurance company. If you believe otherwise, I have some choice beachfront property I'd like to sell you for pennies on the dollar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 ? Saint Marshawn of Cayenne? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 I'll be nice and back off the stupid comment, but you're incredibley naive if you think he wasn't under the influence... Why else do you take off? Give me one realistic reason to do so... As morally unfortunate as it is, you get in a lot less trouble for a hit and run than a DUI related accident. A completely innocent accident will at most cost you money...and probably only raised insurance rates because the potential law suit would go to your insurance company. If you believe otherwise, I have some choice beachfront property I'd like to sell you for pennies on the dollar! As I said, this has been discussed ad nauseum. Do a search on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 As I said, this has been discussed ad nauseum. Do a search on it. doh...the thread title included "...Lynch's appeal" If you're so nauseated by the topic, why click on the link? How did your search for the timing of Lynch's appeal work out for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 doh...the thread title included "...Lynch's appeal" If you're so nauseated by the topic, why click on the link? How did your search for the timing of Lynch's appeal work out for you? Lynch's incident last summer, which was what Joma and I were discussing, has been discussed ad nauseum. Hope that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Lynch's incident last summer, which was what Joma and I were discussing, has been discussed ad nauseum. Hope that helps. Malox, hope it helps your tummy, since you seem to need to police discussions of a topic that irks you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOR Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 Malox, hope it helps your tummy, since you seem to need to police discussions of a topic that irks you. Thanks for the tip.[/policing] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 The longer the commish takes, the better for Lynch. If he keeps his nose clean it may help in the decision. If he reduces the suspension and Lynch 's up again, look-out, the next suspension will be a big one. JMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMIEBUF12 Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 right after the patriots game lol lol........jauron will complain to roger that had marshawn been in the lineup the score would have been 35-10 instaed of 35-0! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewHampshireBillsFan Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 at least the commish is a bills fan He is not a Bills fan and as far as I can tell he never has been a Bills fan. From the time he was a kid he was interested in the business end of the NFL is what Goodell states in Fortune magazine. Anyway, perhaps I have not seen all the quotes by him and I would be happy to retract this statement if anyone has any evidence that he ever was a serious Bills fan. Growing up in Jamestown alone doesn't make him a Bills fan, although it really should have done so. For example I met a Patsie* fan here in New England who claims the woman who is his wife is from Buffalo. When I asked what football team she supports he said the Pats*, now that she is married to him. That doesn't sound right. I had to wonder if she really supports the Patsies*, or if she really is from Buffalo, or even that his wife is really a woman for that matter. No real Buffalonian could ever become a Patsie* fan, could they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookiemonster Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 He is not a Bills fan and as far as I can tell he never has been a Bills fan. From the time he was a kid he was interested in the business end of the NFL is what Goodell states in Fortune magazine. Anyway, perhaps I have not seen all the quotes by him and I would be happy to retract this statement if anyone has any evidence that he ever was a serious Bills fan. Growing up in Jamestown alone doesn't make him a Bills fan, although it really should have done so. For example I met a Patsie* fan here in New England who claims the woman who is his wife is from Buffalo. When I asked what football team she supports he said the Pats*, now that she is married to him. That doesn't sound right. I had to wonder if she really supports the Patsies*, or if she really is from Buffalo, or even that his wife is really a woman for that matter. No real Buffalonian could ever become a Patsie* fan, could they? Well, Ah.......NO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoner7 Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 I think he should be let off with nothing. The US Constitution states that one can carry and/or transport (the definition of bear as it pertains to this situation) fires arms. Somewhere along the line that right was taken away and a person cannot put a gun in the trunk of his own vehicle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joma Posted July 17, 2009 Share Posted July 17, 2009 I think he should be let off with nothing. The US Constitution states that one can carry and/or transport (the definition of bear as it pertains to this situation) fires arms. Somewhere along the line that right was taken away and a person cannot put a gun in the trunk of his own vehicle. Somewhere along the line they took the right away to carry blunts, too...ain't dat aboudda b**ch? I think Marshawn is the victim here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts