John from Riverside Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 If he fills a need for 2 years then he will be a success.......isn't that what we are looking for is a vet who can step in till Hardy and Johnson develop? Sounds like a plan to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 If he fills a need for 2 years then he will be a success.......isn't that what we are looking for is a vet who can step in till Hardy and Johnson develop? Sounds like a plan to me He's a fly route runner. We need a hell of a lot more than that for our #2 WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marauderswr80 Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 I dont mind him....I mean, he might take away double coverage for Evans, he might not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 if he's healthy he wouldn't be. He had nagging injuries through out last year. The two years before that he had 2 thousand yard seasons. It's just the most vocal posters want to have a big named clown like T.O without really thinking things through Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 I wouldn't mind Galloway. He and Evans on the outside, Reed and Fine/rookie TE work the middle. He wouldn't be the can't-miss, picture perfect fit Coles would've been. But its better than risking the season on a 7th round sophomore because he made two nice plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 Id rather see us add Amani Toomer than Galloway. Although if that's what it takes to keep Galloway from going to New England, I'm all for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 5, 2009 Author Share Posted March 5, 2009 Strictly from a X's and O's perspective Taking the names aside and looking at the strengths of the players.....if you had burners like Evans and Galloway on the outside.......and a quality Tight End running routes underneath IF we threw the ball deep on play action every once in a while....then this should open up things for the running game..... At this point to me it isn't about the name of the player they bring in but what strengths they bring with them.......and how we incorporate that strength into our offense........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantankerous Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 Id rather see us add Amani Toomer than Galloway. Although if that's what it takes to keep Galloway from going to New England, I'm all for it. Toomer over Galloway? Really? I've always like Joey since he was drafted by the Sea-chickens in like...94? Seriously though, I think he could be a big help to our team if he's healthy. I know he's older than dirt but I think he's still got some rubber left on the tires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 Strictly from a X's and O's perspective Taking the names aside and looking at the strengths of the players.....if you had burners like Evans and Galloway on the outside.......and a quality Tight End running routes underneath IF we threw the ball deep on play action every once in a while....then this should open up things for the running game..... At this point to me it isn't about the name of the player they bring in but what strengths they bring with them.......and how we incorporate that strength into our offense........ I agree, and that's why I don't think a place like Buffalo needs 2 burners on the outside. I don't feel like that strategy works for any north eastern team not in a dome. Plus Trent's forte is not necessarily accuracy on deep balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 I agree, and that's why I don't think a place like Buffalo needs 2 burners on the outside. I don't feel like that strategy works for any north eastern team not in a dome. Plus Trent's forte is not necessarily accuracy on deep balls. he's probably not quite a burner any more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lofton80 Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 My issue would be Trent rarely throws downfield so Galloway is going to go to waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 he's probably not quite a burner any more Well sure but he's certainly no possession receiver. Never been known for making a tough catch over the middle, etc. He's pretty fragile too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalonian-at-Heart Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 If he fills a need for 2 years then he will be a success.......isn't that what we are looking for is a vet who can step in till Hardy and Johnson develop? Sounds like a plan to me Because he is too much like Evans. He either blows up with 7 catches for 157 yards and 2 touchdowns, or kills you with 2 catches for eight yards. We need a guy that catches 6 balls for 78 yds most games. Unfortunately that guy signed with the Bengals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2020 Our Year For Sure Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 Because he is too much like Evans. He either blows up with 7 catches for 157 yards and 2 touchdowns, or kills you with 2 catches for eight yards. We need a guy that catches 6 balls for 78 yds most games. Unfortunately that guy signed with the Bengals. And it would've been great if we got him for $6M a year, but INSANITY if it was $7M!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 5, 2009 Author Share Posted March 5, 2009 Because he is too much like Evans. He either blows up with 7 catches for 157 yards and 2 touchdowns, or kills you with 2 catches for eight yards. We need a guy that catches 6 balls for 78 yds most games. Unfortunately that guy signed with the Bengals. What if they took turns blowing up and killing us? That might be alright Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts