Joe Miner Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 So in other words, you have cheated on your taxes at least once in your life. I thought so. So is your plan to be witty, and when I respond that I haven't you just call me a liar instead? Good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 So is your plan to be witty, and when I respond that I haven't you just call me a liar instead? Good one. If you want to be on public record saying, "I, _____, aka Joe Miner, have never once cheated on my taxes in the biggest or smallest way..." and know that virtually everyone now knows you're a liar, please do. I won't have to say it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted February 6, 2009 Author Share Posted February 6, 2009 Actually, they all admitted they cheated on their taxes, except the one that didn't cheat on her taxes, Solis. ...and they only admitted it because they got caught in the 8 round of the vetting process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Makes you wonder how the Bush Cabinet cleared the vetting process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HereComesTheReignAgain Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Makes you wonder how the Bush Cabinet cleared the vetting process. For someone who thought so little of the last administration, I'm surprised you would use them as the measuring stick for success. Is it OK if Obama's administration is "not any worse than" or "slightly better than" the last bunch of slugs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I'm not. I just find it funny how people are going crazy about Obama and he hasn't even been in office for a month. And how could you think anything else about the last administration? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Obamamyster? Not sure what you mean? Oh, and don't subject me to the whole thread. Is Obamamyster the hillbilly version of: "Obamameister?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HereComesTheReignAgain Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Obamamyster? Not sure what you mean? Oh, and don't subject me to the whole thread. Is Obamamyster the hillbilly version of: "Obamameister?" I believe they prefer the term culturally challenged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I believe they prefer the term culturally challenged. Aren't we all? I am a "flatlander." Back Off FlatLander! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HereComesTheReignAgain Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Aren't we all? I am a "flatlander." Back Off FlatLander! Gotta love a nice side by side! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finknottle Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Blood in the water according to the Party of Failure and the lot that (wrongly) believes they have a grasp on reality. The majority of Americans don't seem to be buying into your faux-scandals. They also think he's on the right track with the economy. So, while you people shout from the rooftops that Obama is packing his administration with tax cheats, the rest of us who don't want America to fail have confidence in the guy who won in a landslide victory on a platform that indicted your heros' economic policies. You just don't get it. The question is why they are making a big deal about a small tax problem. You say it is because she is pro-union. I say it is because after four such nominees the Republicans taste blood in the water on this issue. It doesn't matter whether people agree with them or not. What matters is that they see a pattern among the nominees and want to use it to define the Democrats. An insightfull commentator you are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Gotta love a nice side by side! Even better x2! One for each hand! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Actually I've placed the bar pretty high for the actual nominees, as opposed to yours and others' strategy of just making crap up where there isn't any. You post was loaded with outright fabrications. Just like saying Mrs. Obama should be President in 8 years, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Is it OK if Obama's administration is "not any worse than" or "slightly better than" the last bunch of slugs? Liberals tend to buy into the "Duke Preston Syndrome" way of looking at things. Duke Preston is a very, very good center. Because he's not Melvin Fowler. And that's good enough for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweet baboo Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 I have cheated on my taxes, yes. I am not proud of it. You have, too. In fact, you're precisely the kind of person I was referring to. I think I missed something along the way as I was spending way too many years in school studying science and engineering, but I was always under the impression that if I didn't pay my taxes perfectly, I would get audited and the IRS would hound me to my death (see IRS demons in Spellsinger 6). so no, I've never cheated on my taxes. However, since government officials seem to be able to get away with it without even a slap on the wrist, I might as well do it too. note to big brother: I was just kidding. I don't do my own taxes, so please don't hound me like you did Couvier Coulb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 I have cheated on my taxes, yes. I am not proud of it. You have, too. In fact, you're precisely the kind of person I was referring to. I've never cheated on my taxes In fact the government usually ends up using a couple hundred bucks of my money as an interest free loan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Liberals tend to buy into the "Duke Preston Syndrome" way of looking at things. Duke Preston is a very, very good center. Because he's not Melvin Fowler. And that's good enough for them. Maybe, maybe. Though I would never name my child "Duke" in honor of him. What kinda name is "Duke?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Maybe, maybe. Though I would never name my child "Duke" in honor of him. What kinda name is "Duke?" Not his name, but I would consider John Wayne (Marion something) a man's man. That was his nickname. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 No, I don't they should be held to a higher standard. Why would they? I think everyone should be held to the same standard, and that they shouldn't cheat on their taxes. I just think that about 95%, in big and small ways, at times, do. And I think most people throwing the biggest stink about this, are probably the biggest hypocrites and liars. Not anyone specific, just a general theory. You don't think the leaders of the country and those setting the tax policy should be held to a higher standard than the ones that are doing the following? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StupidNation Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 You don't think the leaders of the country and those setting the tax policy should be held to a higher standard than the ones that are doing the following? I think if the leader had a "R" next to his name his answer wouldn't be the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts