Jump to content

Bigfoot Found In North Georgia


Steely Dan

Bigfoot  

47 members have voted

  1. 1. Real Or Elaborate Hoax?

    • Hoax
      30
    • Real
      17


Recommended Posts

I love how the close-up pic of the face is blurry. Why aren't they able to get a clear pic?? I wanted to see if we could tell if it was a mask or not. Probably the reason for the blurry pic...cause it IS a mask!! <_<

 

that's what i was thinking. . . if i find bigfoot, sasquatch, aliens, whatever . . . I'm gonna use more than a 2 megapixel camera to take the pics . . .

 

Hoax . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I love how the close-up pic of the face is blurry. Why aren't they able to get a clear pic?? I wanted to see if we could tell if it was a mask or not. Probably the reason for the blurry pic...cause it IS a mask!! :lol:

 

Why are the pictures of you close up so blurry too? <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how the close-up pic of the face is blurry. Why aren't they able to get a clear pic?? I wanted to see if we could tell if it was a mask or not. Probably the reason for the blurry pic...cause it IS a mask!! <_<

 

The close-up of the face is blurry because it's not a close-up of the face, it's a blown-up portion of the other picture. That doesn't indicate a hoax in and of itself, it indicates they only took one picture.

 

What indicates a hoax is that the "body" looks like a shag rug. Bigfoot is almost always reported as having "hair", not shaggy goat-like "fur". The "pelt", such as it is, is completely inconsistent with most reports of Sasquatch Americanus.

 

 

 

And by the way...copyright to "Bigfoot Global LLC"? Someone formed a limited liability company to search for Bigfoot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The close-up of the face is blurry because it's not a close-up of the face, it's a blown-up portion of the other picture. That doesn't indicate a hoax in and of itself, it indicates they only took one picture.

 

What indicates a hoax is that the "body" looks like a shag rug. Bigfoot is almost always reported as having "hair", not shaggy goat-like "fur". The "pelt", such as it is, is completely inconsistent with most reports of Sasquatch Americanus.

 

 

 

And by the way...copyright to "Bigfoot Global LLC"? Someone formed a limited liability company to search for Bigfoot?

 

P'ETA's gonna be all over this. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The close-up of the face is blurry because it's not a close-up of the face, it's a blown-up portion of the other picture. That doesn't indicate a hoax in and of itself, it indicates they only took one picture.

Yeah, I know. I'm just messing with you! <_< But, most pictures of BF are blurry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And by the way...copyright to "Bigfoot Global LLC"? Someone formed a limited liability company to search for Bigfoot?

It didn't stop Al Gore from making a corporation for finding Manbearpig

 

Real or Elaborate hoax? Neither. It's just a plain old hoax. There is nothing elaborate about waiting for your college roomate to pass out drunk on halloween and throwing him in a box.
<_<
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What indicates a hoax is that the "body" looks like a shag rug. Bigfoot is almost always reported as having "hair", not shaggy goat-like "fur". The "pelt", such as it is, is completely inconsistent with most reports of Sasquatch Americanus.

 

Can I ask how the hell you'd know what the "real" bigfoot's hair is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...