blzrul Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Quelle surprise. What's that I hear, wingnut heads exploding? Note that his approval rating is not the lowest ever, but his disapproval rating is the highest. So ... he's finally proving out to be a "unificaterer" instead of a "divider-upper". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Quelle surprise. What's that I hear, wingnut heads exploding? Note that his approval rating is not the lowest ever, but his disapproval rating is the highest. So ... he's finally proving out to be a "unificaterer" instead of a "divider-upper". At least his tax cuts paid for them....oh wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finknottle Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 Quelle surprise.So ... he's finally proving out to be a "unificaterer" instead of a "divider-upper". I think it's time we try again with another great unifier, short on divisive specifics and long on feel-goodism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 I think it's time we try again with another great unifier, short on divisive specifics and long on feel-goodism. I think Obama will be a lot more of a competent President than Bush, if that's who you were refering to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 I think Obama will be a lot more of a competent President than Bush, if that's who you were refering to. Like I've said before: nothing breeds success quite like aiming really, really low. Hell, my lawn mower would be a more competent president than Bush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 Like I've said before: nothing breeds success quite like aiming really, really low. Hell, my lawn more would be a more competent president than Bush. What kind of grass is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 What kind of grass is it? I think he meant "lawnmower." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 Like I've said before: nothing breeds success quite like aiming really, really low. Hell, my lawn mower would be a more competent president than Bush. Have good weekend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 I think he meant "lawnmower." Yep. The lawn's better VP material, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 I think Obama will be a lot more of a competent President than Bush, if that's who you were refering to. Not to knock Obama but I think even this guy would be a better President than Dubya. I think any of the Candidates running are better than the nutjob right wingers who run the country now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsWatch Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 Popularity polls are pretty poor ways to judge anything other than idiotic things like American Idol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede316 Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 Yea...and the Democrat controlled congress a whopping 22% approval rating. Good job there. http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 Bush = Most Unpopular in Modern History Thanks for the update Darth Obvious. In other news Benazir Bhutto is still dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted May 3, 2008 Author Share Posted May 3, 2008 Bush = Most Unpopular in Modern History Thanks for the update Darth Obvious. In other news Benazir Bhutto is still dead And if someone had merely posted that statement without statistical proof, wingnuts would have disputed it. It's really quite funny how desperate little people are to weasel out of admitting that electing this moron was a really really bad way to start out the new millenium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 And if someone had merely posted that statement without statistical proof, wingnuts would have disputed it. It's really quite funny how desperate little people are to weasel out of admitting that electing this moron was a really really bad way to start out the new millenium. What are you going to do with your BDS after January 20th? I feel sorry for you, you are such a bitter person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 It's quite ironic that the war on President Bush is fueled by chants of "He lied, and he deceived us." The media is beside themselves with disgust that they didn't question the premise for invading Iraq harder. President Bush is the worst public speaker to ever hold that august office. IMHO. So along comes an erudite loquacious enigmatic young Senator who preaches "change". And the media apparently never learned the lesson from their bad Bush experience. They are doing backflips to get out of the way of stories on the right irreverent and repugnant Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers and Rezko. To me Obama is the Putney Swope of American politics. Swope got elected the CEO and promised no change and delivered the opposite. Obama's preaching change for the sake of change. If he does get elected, a lot of people who blindly voted for him and "change" could be shocked at the kind of change he really believes in. He's a closet Marxist that believes the answer to everyone's problems is to be found in the government. He believes the government must be an integral part of everyone's lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 And if someone had merely posted that statement without statistical proof, wingnuts would have disputed it. It's really quite funny how desperate little people are to weasel out of admitting that electing this moron was a really really bad way to start out the new millenium. I don't see how anyone could dispute the fact that GW is the most unpopular modern President Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted May 3, 2008 Author Share Posted May 3, 2008 I don't see how anyone could dispute the fact that GW is the most unpopular modern President Oooooo believe me, there are plenty of them. I read a letter to the editor recently (published clearly to allow the writer to make a fool of himself) stating that history will show Bush was one of the best EVER. And of course the "Silence of the Wingnuts" on this board should tell you something else. You know, they're the ones who dismiss anything negative that's said about the most incompetent administration in memory by claiming that the writer is prejudiced against said group of nincompoops. You'll know them because they invariably end their rants with "Bush Bad". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 Oooooo believe me, there are plenty of them. I read a letter to the editor recently (published clearly to allow the writer to make a fool of himself) stating that history will show Bush was one of the best EVER. Effectiveness and popularity are mutually exclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 I think Obama will be a lot more of a competent President than Bush, if that's who you were refering to. better than Bush isnm't good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts