Tipster19 Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 The Raiders don't want to pay Jordan his bonus and they could be ripe for a trade. They have the first pick in the 4th(#96) and 5th(#128) rds. They also have an additional pick in the 5th(#155) from New England. I think that this was from the trade for WR Doug Gabriel. Does Jordan and possibly the 4th rd pick or the first pick in the 5th rd for McGahee be attractive enough to make this trade? If so, we would be recouping the 5th rder that we lost last year for McCargo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 the 5th was for hargrove. and i think id just stay put with OUR man willis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 I think you have that reversed. We would ahve to give up more in that trade. McGahee and a 4th for Lamont and a fifth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 NO ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis in NC Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 And what size of bonus is Jordan due? The tradee team would have to pay that bonus. Sometimes these "roster bonuses" get pretty crazy. I think Travis Henry was due an $8.3 million bonus this month, so they cut him loose. Of course, then they invite him to come back the next day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipster19 Posted March 6, 2007 Author Share Posted March 6, 2007 Forget this thread, he restructured. From 4. something million to 3 million. We got better issues now. McGahee's stock just got flatlined with this Thomas Jones trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 The Raiders don't want to pay Jordan his bonus and they could be ripe for a trade. They have the first pick in the 4th(#96) and 5th(#128) rds. They also have an additional pick in the 5th(#155) from New England. I think that this was from the trade for WR Doug Gabriel. Does Jordan and possibly the 4th rd pick or the first pick in the 5th rd for McGahee be attractive enough to make this trade? If so, we would be recouping the 5th rder that we lost last year for McCargo. nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.....lamont jordan is a good #2 man..thats all. saw him play a lot out here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbillsfan12 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cantankerous Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Oh helllll no. I'd take McGahee over Lamont Jordan anyday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE U Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Willis is headed to Denver in a sign and trade move for Henry, orchestrated by the Mad Irishman and the old troll Marv, after they share a few beers and geritol/red bull cocktails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 JORDAN! NO WAY! He's not that good to begin with. He played back up most of his career. He wasn't all that good in Oakland as the starting RB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 JORDAN! NO WAY! He's not that good to begin with. He played back up most of his career. He wasn't all that good in Oakland as the starting RB. The last time we played them, he had over 100 yards, and 3TDs to boot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I think you have that reversed. We would ahve to give up more in that trade. McGahee and a 4th for Lamont and a fifth. Rye or bourbon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts