slothrop Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Foley picture Apparently, they showed this three times in one day. It was not an innocent mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Cheney with Xs over his face? Remember who did that? CNN. Oh yeah...that was a 'mistake'. 796080[/snapback] I think the mistake was that they forgot the stink lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share Posted October 5, 2006 You look to what some wiseass in the production room does as proof of a networks biased agenda? Thats like judging a mechanic by what type of hand cleaner he uses. This is no different that the X over Cheneys face. And that was much ado about nothing, too. 796080[/snapback] Man, do you get a lot of dirt in your ears when you stick your head in the sand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 You look to what some wiseass in the production room does as proof of a networks biased agenda? Thats like judging a mechanic by what type of hand cleaner he uses. This is no different that the X over Cheneys face. And that was much ado about nothing, too. 796080[/snapback] How about the fact that they have Republican Pundits delivering the news everyday? That enough for ya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Youre right. I gotta change the channel...to someone like Keith Olberman. Nuttin betta than a leftard screaming about Fox being biased with a copy of the NY Times under his arm. 796306[/snapback] They can both be biased outlets, you know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 The Dow Jones thing is actually great news. But one thing at a time. Maybe six years from now we can get back to where we started from on the War on Terror, too. That would be a major accomplishment, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Maybe six years from now we can get back to where we started from on the War on Terror, too.796369[/snapback] That would be...terrorists taking flight lessons, preparing to crash airliners into buildings. Not so great a thing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 That would be...terrorists taking flight lessons, preparing to crash airliners into buildings. Not so great a thing... 796372[/snapback] No, now that we got such a good handle on things, and have decisive leaders, we could easily have prevented it. I was talking post 9/11 anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 They can both be biased outlets, you know... 796358[/snapback] Nevermind that the liberal/conservative bias thing is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy overstated in the case of the NYT, WSJ, and others (except for the cable news networks, CNN, MSNBC, Fox, et al - they don't even friggin try to be in the center, lol). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 The Dow Jones thing is actually great news. But one thing at a time. Maybe six years from now we can get back to where we started from on the War on Terror, too. That would be a major accomplishment, too. 796369[/snapback] In 6 years, I'll want the 1.5 trillion we will have spent on the disaster that is sure to be Iraq by then. Money shmoney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Foley picture Apparently, they showed this three times in one day. It was not an innocent mistake. 796073[/snapback] Do you think that it would be best if they lose their FCC license? I await your belittlement and dismissal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Do you think that it would be best if they lose their FCC license? I await your belittlement and dismissal. 796616[/snapback] Sure, that'd be cool with me! Oh, you weren't talking to me? Nevermind... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Sure, that'd be cool with me! Oh, you weren't talking to me? Nevermind... 796628[/snapback] No I wasn't! But Lenin would love ya! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Pretty smart on their part. The knuckle-draggers here are a good indicator of how stupid and gullible the rest of the country is, so I am sure it works. Foley is an Irish name...Irish live in MA and NY...MA and NY are long-time Democratic states...erego he is a Dem because as we all know Dems like sex (Repigs don't, because they are no good at it I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Pretty smart on their part. The knuckle-draggers here are a good indicator of how stupid and gullible the rest of the country is, so I am sure it works. Foley is an Irish name...Irish live in MA and NY...MA and NY are long-time Democratic states...erego he is a Dem because as we all know Dems like sex (Repigs don't, because they are no good at it I guess. 796653[/snapback] You will fall down if you continue to spin, blz... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Off your meds Debbie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slothrop Posted October 6, 2006 Author Share Posted October 6, 2006 Do you think that it would be best if they lose their FCC license? I await your belittlement and dismissal. 796616[/snapback] No, I don't want anyone censored. I would settle for Fox to quit saying "Fair and Balanced" and to replace it with "Biased, and we lie once in a while" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 No, I don't want anyone censored. I would settle for Fox to quit saying "Fair and Balanced" and to replace it with "Biased, and we lie once in a while" 796732[/snapback] Ah but a good positioning statement sets forth what makes them UNIQUE. This is not unique among media. They are all biased one way or another. It's up to the individual to be informed and sort out the truth instead of swallowing pablum. How about "This ain't a welfare state - figure it out yourself". Right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 They are all biased one way or another. It's up to the individual to be informed and sort out the truth instead of swallowing pablum. 796798[/snapback] Okay, I admit I've had a few beers so my judgement may be clouded But the fact that blzrul said something that actually made sense to me is frightening. If anyone has a gun, please kill me and put me out of my misery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 You look to what some wiseass in the production room does as proof of a networks biased agenda? Thats like judging a mechanic by what type of hand cleaner he uses. This is no different that the X over Cheneys face. And that was much ado about nothing, too. 796080[/snapback] Right...this incident is the only one Fox has ever done, there's no bias there. Yeah, I know CNN has shown bias. All networks do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts