chetsap Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 My vote will be Holcomb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozymandius Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 I think Holcomb has the worst chance out of the three. It's on JP. If he continues to be inconsistent, the braintrust will give the job to their hand-selected goldenboy Nall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 i don't know if i like this choice, but i think Holcomb and Losman will play to a draw in the preseason and they will give the first start to Losman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
udonkey Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Flutie...or maybe Favre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chetsap Posted April 14, 2006 Author Share Posted April 14, 2006 Losman has to prove himself first. It seems like all he cares about is his hair! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooldudeav Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Losman opens the season. but i am not saying that he will be are starter for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Yep, havent had one of these topics in about a week, it was high time for another one. I cant believe you took the time to register just to post this crap. chetsap = RJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 he will be are starter 661891[/snapback] .....he will be OUR starter......please....I'm begging you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrite Gal Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Losman opens the season. but i am not saying that he will be are starter for the season. 661891[/snapback] Losman defifibitely needs to prove himself, but the key to this strikes me as being that the stabdard of production he has to achieve will be noticably less than that Holcomb would have to produce to get the nod over JP. If JP shows some upside and potential development, actually venal sins in his play like the team losing will get put aside in the hopes that continues play will result into JP developing for the future. Holcomb on the other hand gets no future cushion. He and the team will need to win and win immediately or he sits. Nall really is a wildcard in this. If he suceeds he plays and has little margin for error as I think the Bills patience with him getting the ball rather than the clipboard will need him putting up some glossy numbers in pre-season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chetsap Posted April 14, 2006 Author Share Posted April 14, 2006 Yep, havent had one of these topics in about a week, it was high time for another one. I cant believe you took the time to register just to post this crap. chetsap = RJ 661921[/snapback] sorry there cool guy. nobody made you read this crap! ramius= ds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 My vote will be Holcomb. 661875[/snapback] is this your first day on this site???? , have you taken the time to look back and see what has been talked about ????? do you think this is a new site started this morning ????? do you like making polls ??? do you have any idea how many drinks you have to buy at the opener ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 sorry there cool guy. nobody made you read this crap! ramius= ds 661982[/snapback] why post crap ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Forget this, we NEED another Moulds thread!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marv's Neighbor Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Flutie...or maybe Favre 661883[/snapback] Agreed! The good thing about Flutie is that with our lack of protection, he dosen't have as far to fall when he gets knocked on his as-* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Jonathan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#1TN Bills Fan Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 JP will be the starting QB in 2006. He has way too much potential, and, let's face it, had a HORRENDOUS O'line last season. I don't know why there is so much negative talk against this guy! Compare his first season stats to those of John Elway. If memory serves correctly, Elway had a QB rating under 50, and Losman had one above 60! You guys are being ridiculous! Just because his first season numbers aren't as good as Roethlisberger's and Marino's doesn't mean the guy is a bust. For crying aloud, you guys are saying that Elway would have been a bust! At least give this guy 16 starts before you write him off as a bust. It's not like we are ready for the playoffs. Plus, we gave RJ alot longer before writing him off as a bust!!! Let's go Buffalo!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Losman defifibitely needs to prove himself, but the key to this strikes me as being that the stabdard of production he has to achieve will be noticably less than that Holcomb would have to produce to get the nod over JP. 661959[/snapback] Most defifbitely! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poeticlaw Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 JP will be the starting QB in 2006. He has way too much potential, and, let's face it, had a HORRENDOUS O'line last season. I don't know why there is so much negative talk against this guy! Compare his first season stats to those of John Elway. If memory serves correctly, Elway had a QB rating under 50, and Losman had one above 60! You guys are being ridiculous! Just because his first season numbers aren't as good as Roethlisberger's and Marino's doesn't mean the guy is a bust. For crying aloud, you guys are saying that Elway would have been a bust! At least give this guy 16 starts before you write him off as a bust. It's not like we are ready for the playoffs. Plus, we gave RJ alot longer before writing him off as a bust!!! Let's go Buffalo!!! 662014[/snapback] Not only did we give RJ longer RJ was also in the leaugue for three years with 4 games under his belt before coming to us and couldnt hold off and old short man from the starting Job. JP has all the tools, he did not have the right situation last year at all. Lets face it all his naysayers are pretty much gone, (Moulds, Adams, Malloy) the only one left he has to beat out is Holcomb. Im sorry I believe in Holcomb backing up games But i didnt like his style of play at all and his favorite target is no longer on the roster. I think the new set of Fast receivers and hopefull returng of our TE Everett and using Mcgahee more out of the back as a screen will definatley help his play. The 2 things that he needs to help him is a LT and a strong back up runing back so its not so obvious we are runing the ball. Lets face it the offense last years was so predicitable that somebody who knew nothing about footbal could probably see what we were going to do next. Mcgahee is in=Run Mcgahee is out=Pass 2nd and 6-9=Pass 3rd down=pass pass pass Red zone=pass Real good running philosophy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy Chief Navy Pride Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Hey newkid-----why is this not a poll? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Vince. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts