Hawerchuk10 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 I'll take Brady. Everyday of the week and twice on Sunday! He's 10x the QB Manning will ever be. For the people that are gonna bust on me... Brady 3 Super Bowl championships! Manning 0, can't even make it there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 i'll take the guy with the rings... in 25 years, if peyton has rings, i'll take him... if not, i'm sticking with brady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 If I'm betting on a playoff game, I'd rather have Peyton... on the other team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Manning, and it's not close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Brady is as clucth as you can get. Easy choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 I'd rather have the one that comes with an NFL caliber O-line. Without that, JP is just as good as Otto Graham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfanmiami(oh) Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Whoever says Manning must be drinking some kind of kool-aid.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 I'd rather have the one that comes with an NFL caliber O-line. Without that, JP is just as good as Otto Graham. 568746[/snapback] so, what ar eyou saying? otto graham was bad? didn't he win like 15 NFL championships?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsObserver Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Manning, and it's not close. 568744[/snapback] laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawerchuk10 Posted January 15, 2006 Author Share Posted January 15, 2006 Manning, and it's not close. 568744[/snapback] HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Must be a Colts fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevestojan Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Are you serious? Brady, without hesitation. The guy has WON three SBs and two SB MVPs. Sure, there is no 'I' in team, but there certainly is an 'I' in WIN. The guy was a late round pick, and when Bledsoe got hurt he didn't miss a beat. Got in there, and didn't have to "take a season to get used to the game". He's the best QB in the league right now without a question. Manning, on the other hand is a product of an unreal offensive line. He has the same type of arm as Bledsoe. If you put Drew behind the Colts line he would be MUCH better. Perhaps not as good as Peyton, but a hell of alot closer. Peyton is a choke artist. Brady is a proven winner. (Now I am going to go vomit for giving Brady that much praise.... see you in a few). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 so, what ar eyou saying? otto graham was bad? didn't he win like 15 NFL championships?? 568750[/snapback] No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that Otto Graham wouldn't win sh-- behind the Bills' current O-line, and neither would Manning or Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jester43 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 brady, but only because he plays well OUTSIDE in bad weather. he'd do much better in buffalo. manning is every bit the player, if not more so,than brady. by the way, i'm not blaming manning for his offensive line playing like sh-- today like some are. i just thought all week that (a)ben would play well, and (b) the steelers are the TOUGHER team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that Otto Graham wouldn't win sh-- behind the Bills' current O-line, and neither would Manning or Brady. 568765[/snapback] oh good.. that is a good point... i was going to say man. otto graham? bad? pass me that sh-- edit: its sunday. i'm having a hard time processing information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 I'll take Brady. Everyday of the week and twice on Sunday! He's 10x the QB Manning will ever be. For the people that are gonna bust on me... Brady 3 Super Bowl championships! Manning 0, can't even make it there. 568737[/snapback] BRADY--obviously,.,.He would have won that game for the colts.ala Montana or other clutch QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Brady is as clucth as you can get. Easy choice. 568745[/snapback] He was GREAT yesterday. MISTER Clutch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 He was GREAT yesterday. MISTER Clutch! 568789[/snapback] Hey, I loved the guy and the Patsies failed yesterday as much as everyone here (I was cheering for the Broncos as if they were my Bills) but that doesn´t change the fact that Brady is a great QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawgg Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Dude, you have some serious issues. He lost one game. Overall, look at the past 4 years objectively. Brady has been better. He was GREAT yesterday. MISTER Clutch! 568789[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 Dude, you have some serious issues. He lost one game. Overall, look at the past 4 years objectively. Brady has been better. 568804[/snapback] The Pats have been better...no doubt. Yoy guys seem to think this is tennis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grant Posted January 15, 2006 Share Posted January 15, 2006 The Pats have been better...no doubt. Yoy guys seem to think this is tennis. 568808[/snapback] It's not like the Colts are untalented. Looking at the two rosters, it's not unreasonable to say that the Colts have a more talented squad than the Patriots. So I don't think that excuse works for Peyton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts