BADOLBILZ Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 How considerate. Top 5 Worst TD Moves: 1. Hiring MM 2. Hiring GW 3. Extending Drew 4. 2002 draft 5. Changing uniforms Top 5 Best TD Moves: 1. Signing TKO 2. Trading PP. 3. Signing Fletcher over Cowart 4. 2001 draft 5. Drafting McGee Top 5 worst > Top 5 best 546110[/snapback] I would say the Kelly Holcomb signing has to be #5 worst. He's just good enough to make a team impatient and unwilling to work for a grass green young QB, but not good enough to do any significant winning or build around. Team that with a coach with no balls at all, and you have the most pointless, unproductive season in Buffalo Bills history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 I would say the Kelly Holcomb signing has to be #5 worst. He's just good enough to make a team impatient and unwilling to work for a grass green young QB, but not good enough to do any significant winning or build around. Team that with a coach with no balls at all, and you have the most pointless, unproductive season in Buffalo Bills history. 546437[/snapback] The word lukewarm comes to mind ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Philster Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 I actually liked the Holcomb signing...Mularkey screwed up the whole thing by benching the guy he was supposed to be grooming to be our QB of the future for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 He has done far worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 I would say the Kelly Holcomb signing has to be #5 worst. 546437[/snapback] You can't be serious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 If people think the Bills won legitamately last week then they have to think Mularkey is a better coach than Marvin Lewis........ cause Mike beat him on his field with a lesser team cause Marvin let his team take the Bills too lightly if the game was on the level then Mike Mularkey is head and shoulders the better coach but it wasnt....pick six's and kick returns are easily concealed....it was merely an exhibition for the bengals, who want the 4th seed. 546107[/snapback] So what you are saying is that Marvin Lewis KNEW that he could not break into one of the top two seeds. If that is true... Then before the Buffalo game, Cincy was conceding that DEN was gonna win the last two games. DEN did do that. How did they know? That is just plain moronic if they banked on DEN doing that... Especially with a game in SD. So in other words Cincy is so afraid of PITT, even at Paul Brown Stadium that they would hedge their playoff future and go through DEN in DEN or IND in IND That they would be so defeatist that they would botch their last two games so as to AVOID PITT, who they beat once already this season on the road. That they would also think that DEN's last two games would be DEN victory's (which they turned out to be). Your logic also indicates that they are also afraid of DEN. But yet, they don't fear IND or JAX? What makes them think that and see the importance of a 4th seed over a 3rd seed? Why is Cincy so afraid of Pittsburgh? They will have to play a JAX (11-5 or 12-4) team that already beat Cincy this year. IMO, JAX should be feared more than PITT. IMO, the funny thing is that I see KC laying an egg against Cincy... No matter how "hard" you seem to think that Cincy is "trying" to lose it. With that scenario, I see PITT-CIN on a collision course in the WC round. This would be your worst case scenario, right? You always play for the best seed possible. IMO, things tend to backfire on you if you don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts